Skip to main content

A Political Party and The Government

Since the election ends, there are quite number of the political analysts using various media trying to put their views on aftermath of the election.

Their discussions touch on various aspects including Election Commission [EC]'s role, ineffectiveness of EC conducting election, protest, legitimacy of the government and so on.

Here, I only wanted to discuss on a single issue which I felt that most of the analysts had missed out undesirably.

As what I had observed many of them indistinguishably missed out the difference between a government and a political party.

Under the Westminster approach which was adapted and practiced in Malaysia, a political party that controls Parliament will form government and allow ruling this nation for 5 years.

In each election, the people must elect a political party which had majority in Parliament by giving mandate to them.

Like in USA, the people will elect either Republican Party or Democrat Party of their choice to rule them. In UK, Labour Party or Conservative Party through election will rule the nation.

This is norm which is happening in the most part of the world.   

Interestingly in Malaysia this simple notion is totally ignored by the learned people.

In a democratic nation, people have to make the choice. When they made the decision that decision need to be respected. Ultimately they are the superior source of the power.

Unfortunately, in many second and third world countries this notion normally disregarded totally.

Therefore I am not surprised at all.

A government wills remains forever but a political party which forms a government always changes through the election.

The biggest problem is when a political party ruled a nation more than a half century, than the party cannot differentiate between them and the government.

A government is separated from the party. A government cannot become a political party.  A political party will always form a government.   

In a nutshell, the analysts need to understand the difference when they discuss the matters involving a political party and government of the nation.

Kuala Lumpur.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...
Post a Comment
Read more

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.
Post a Comment
Read more