Skip to main content

The Unholy Trinity: Transnational Crime, Corruption, and Terrorism

By Louise Shelley

In this paper Louise Shelley uses empirical research methods to analyse the nexus between transnational crime, corruption and terrorism. Regions analysed include Asia, Latin America, Africa, Europe and the United States. The majority of other research has focused on the connection between transnational crime groups and corruption and this connection is becoming more understood and accepted. However, the connection between terrorist groups and corruption is much less accepted or understood and this paper sheds some light on this important relationship. 
 
The paper’s analysis also differs from other research in that it divides transnational crime groups into old and new and discusses how this affects their relationship with corrupt governments and or terrorists groups.  It finds that old transnational crime groups (e.g. in Japan) have long-term financial interests that encourage the safeguarding of state institutions.  By corrupting these state institutions, these crime groups maintain long-term self-preservation.  These groups tend to “…contribute to political campaigns, run candidates for office, or vote as a bloc to influence the electoral process…”  Additionally, they tend to be highly nationalistic, profit greatly from state contracts, encourage economic development, grow with the state to siphon profits, and reject terrorism.

Conversely, it finds that new transnational crime groups (e.g. in Afghanistan) do not profit by corrupting state institutions, i.e., they do not profit from state contracts or launder money through financial institutions.  These groups tend to act like, interact with, and seek out terrorists groups.  Additionally, they tend to prosper by creating unstable governments, chaos, war, and conflict; target porous borders and connect with corrupt law enforcement that are out of the reach of the state; and depend on systemic corruption.
 
The results have two main policy implications.  First, policy-makers need to understand there is a difference between new and old transnational crime groups.  They must understand the ways in which both encourage corruption, and the motives behind that corruption, if they plan to reduce transnational crime, corruption, and terrorism.  Second, policy-makers must broaden their focus on terrorism to include its connection with corruption and transnational crime groups (especially the new groups that act similarly to terrorist groups).  

Source: Anti-Corruption Research Network

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Terrorism in Africa

According to state.gov, ISIS was defeated a few years ago. However, the organization's presence and existence remain conspicuous in Africa. Ongoing conflicts in Somalia, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso demonstrate that ISIS has shifted its focus away from Iraq and Syria. Although ISIS lacks a clear hierarchy like Al-Qaeda, its followers and supporters wholeheartedly believe in its strong ideology. In 2014, the United States led the formation of a broad international coalition known as 'The Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS' to combat the organization during the height of the Syrian and Iraqi conflict. The primary objectives of this 83-member coalition are to degrade and defeat ISIS, which poses a threat to international peace and security. ISIS has brought thousands of foreign fighters from around the world to combat zones like Syria and Iraq, and it has used technology to promote its violent extremist ideology and instigate terrorist attacks. For example, t

Sedition Act 1948 should have been repealed a long time ago. But why?

THE Sedition Act 1948 is a legislative measure that was enacted in Malaysia during the colonial era, designed to curb any form of speech or expression that was deemed to be seditious in nature with the aim of maintaining public order and security. The Sedition Act has been subject to much debate and criticism, with some arguing that it is a violation of freedom of speech and expression. Despite this, the Act remains in force in Malaysia to this day, albeit with some amendments made over the years. Although I concur with the abolition of this Act, it is imperative that a comparable new legislation be enacted to address the escalating prevalence of racially and religiously bigoted remarks that have been unsettling our distinctive multicultural and multi-religious society as of late. An instance that exemplifies the prudent decision-making of the governing body is the substitution of the Internal Security Act of 1960 with the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA). This rep

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i