Skip to main content

Characteristics of Political Terrorism

1.   Political terrorism involves an overall, overarching moral philosophy that is used to justify acts of terrorism, while criminal terrorism generally involves personal greed and selfishness.  This is a very important point.  There is a moral justification for the use of political terrorism, an ends justifies the means notion because we are going to yield a better overall social state.  There is no such reasoning in the criminal terrorist.

2.   Political terrorism can involve activities to obtain money, but those dollars are used for political ends.  Generally speaking, criminal terrorism has an economic basis.

3.   Political terrorists' targets tend to be almost indiscriminate and unpredictable.  Usually no one person is particularly the target, therefore no one is safe.  Criminal terrorists targets on the other hand tend to be more logical - a bank, an armored car - and the targets tend to be specific people, the bank official, the driver of the car.

4.   Political terrorists desire to create a long term atmosphere of fear, coercion and intimidation in the community. Criminal terrorists want to create a short term fear – scare the banker, get the money and get out of there.

5.   Political terroristic acts tend to be more savage - almost a shotgun philosophy - car bombs, nail bombs, double bombs all resulting in mass murder.  The criminal terrorist tends to be more oriented to a specific target.  Blow up this bank, hijack this plane.

6.   Neither political terrorism nor criminal terrorism abide by any rules or conventions of war.

7.   Often political terrorists are willing to die for the cause, while seldom do we see criminal terrorists planning on dying.

8.   Political terrorism differs from criminal terrorism in that political terrorism usually involves efforts to influence an audience.  Generally speaking, the criminal terrorist does not want a big audience. 
Paul Wilkinson, Terrorism and the Liberal State, London: Macmillan, l986.

Source: https://www.unl.edu/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i...

The by-election in Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) and the Indian electorate

  I was born in Malaysia, belonging to the Indian ethnic group, which constitutes approximately 7% of the country's total population. My durable credence is that I am Malaysian first and foremost, and only then do I identify myself as Indian. Regrettably, it saddens me to witness and hear about the actions of certain politicians who question my loyalty to Malaysia. What is even more disheartening is that some Malaysians have been influenced by the manipulative rhetoric of these self-serving politicians. Recently, I have observed numerous discussions on both mainstream and online news platforms regarding the recognition and inclusion of Indians by ruling parties. Surprisingly, even the opposition has displayed a significant interest in the welfare of Indians. Upon contemplating the reasons behind this sudden surge in attention towards Indians, it becomes evident that it is primarily driven by the upcoming Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) by-election. It is noteworthy that such ...