Skip to main content

Errant ministers: Enact Ministerial Code of Conduct like the UK, academic says

PUTRAJAYA should enact a Ministerial Code of Conduct in order to keep Cabinet members in check and ensure they follow basic protocols while holding public office.

“According to the Institute for Government, a UK-based think tank, the Ministerial Code is a set of rules and principles which outline the standards of conduct for Government ministers.

“The codes include the ‘overarching duty’ of ministers to comply with law and abide by the Seven Principles of Public Life, a set of ethical standards which apply to all holders of public office.

“The UK Ministerial Code was last updated in August 2019.  Do we have such a code for our ministers? If not, we can adopt the UK Ministerial Code with appropriate modifications, to meet local conditions,” HELP University Faculty of Business, Economics and Accounting and Institute Crime and Criminology senior lecturer R Paneir Selvam told FocusM.

On Saturday, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed apologised for flouting COVID-19 standard operating procedure (SOP) for dining-in at a coffee shop in Jeli, Kelantan recently.

Mustapa was not the only minister accused of breaching SOP, as Plantation and Commodities Minister Datuk Khairuddin Aman Razali was accused of travelling to Kemaman, Terengganu last month, despite interstate travels being barred.

Others claimed to have breached SOP include International Trade and Industries Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali and Kedah Menteri Besar Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor.

Citing the UK as an example, Paneir Selvam said that its Secretary for Health Matt Hancock resigned on Saturday after a video surfaced showing him breaking social distancing guidelines during lockdown.

“Even though UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson accepted his explanation and allowed him to resume duties, the pressure from within and outside his party forced Hancock to leave,” he said.

 Gov’t leaders owe it to the public, Agong

On Mustapa’s case, while it was commendable that former had apologised for it, the academic said those holding public office must lead by example and follow rules they themselves have written.

“For example, if a parent smokes a cigarette in front of his child and later tells the kid that smoking is hazardous to health, obviously the child will not listen.

“The country’s leaders must act like parents and provide a good example for citizens to follow.

“Plus, they also bear moral responsibilities as a result of the oath they took before the Yang di-Pertuan Agong,” Paneir Selvam mentioned.

Making matters worse, he said many VIPs who flouted SOP in the past have used many excuses to justify their actions, triggering public outcry as they only received a slap on the wrist.

“But ordinary people were harshly penalised for breaching SOP. The rakyat will perceive this as unjust and later pour scorn on the legitimacy of the SOP,” Panier Selvam cautioned.

Such attitude, he added, was alarming as adherence to SOP was crucial to reduce skyrocketing number of COVID-19 cases in the country, triggering many to lose jobs and incomes.

“According to reports, there is an increase in suicide cases during this difficult period and many are burdened by rising unemployment, debt and family stress.

“While people lose jobs and struggle to put food on the table, leaders and prominent people must show compassion and provide guidance to them,” Paneir Selvam remarked. – June 29, 2021.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.