Skip to main content

“Zelenskiy made a ‘fatal mistake’ by trusting NATO” (Part 1)

 It’s always the same with these conferences…The Great Men don’t know what they’re talking about, and have to be educated.

                                                 Sir Alexander Cadogan, Yalta, 6 February 1945

GREAT leaders are sometimes unable to grasp the true nature of a problem. What is going on in Ukraine right now is devastating. In any conflict, ordinary people, particularly women and children, are the primary victims. 

More than two million Ukrainians have been forcibly displaced from their homes and have now become refugees. Families have been split from fathers, brothers and husbands. It is unclear whether they will be reunited with their families anytime soon. 

Ukrainian authorities have instructed able-bodied men to remain to defend the country from the Russian aggression. According to reports in the media, Ukrainian military have stopped some of their citizens at railway stations and border checkpoints, urging them to protect their motherland. 

The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) reported 1,424 civilian deaths in Ukraine as of March 8. 

OHCHR claimed that explosive weapons with a huge effect area, such as heavy artillery shelling and multi-launch rocket systems, as well as missile and air strikes, are to blame for the majority of civilian deaths.

The actual figures, according to the OHCHR, are far higher, particularly in Government-controlled area and in recent days, because information from several locations where significant battles have been taking place has been delayed. This includes, for example, the cities of Volnovakha, Mariupol and Izium, where hundreds of civilians are said to have died. 

When I observe the current crisis in Ukraine, I have a few things in mind. 

To begin with, what is expected of a country’s leader when a crisis looms? Whether it is to protect the people and the country’s borders, or to face a formidable foe with the knowledge that “friends” will come to his help and he or she will do whatever it takes.

Sun Tzu wrote in his book, The Art of War, that if you know your adversary and yourself, you will not be afraid of the outcome of a hundred wars. If you know yourself but not your opponent, every victory will be followed by a defeat. 

And you will lose every war if you do not recognise the adversary or yourself.

This phrase perfectly describes Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s stance to the country’s dispute with Russia. 

Even though the indicators are evident, Zelenskiy was nonchalant of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s intention to “invade” Ukraine. He also believed too much in the North-Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) leaders’ assurances, particularly those from the US and the UK, that they would stand behind him in the event of a confrontation with Russia.

When he was requesting military assistance from other countries, I am also curious as to why he invited his own people and foreign fighters to fight against the powerful Russian army.

Putin undeterred by sanctions 

Per the apnews.com, Poland’s Border Guard said that 22,000 people from all over Europe crossed into Ukraine to defend Ukraine. Zelenskiy has made it illegal for men between the ages of 18 and 60 to leave the nation. Foreign volunteers are also being sought to fight to defend Ukraine, according to Ukrainian authorities.

History has shown that some self-proclaimed “great leaders” endanger the very people they lead, putting their country and its people in wars they cannot win.  

Ukraine is an example of that. People died as a result of a leader’s gaffe. Again, please do not mistake me for a Putin admirer; rather, I am examining this matter objectively. 

When windows of opportunity appeared to find a peaceful settlement rather than start a war, Zelenskiy squandered on the opportunity. 

The issue here is, Putin does not want Ukraine to join NATO, which was explicitly rejected by Zelenskyy, resulting in the current war. 

Ukraine is a sovereign country. It has the option of joining whichever organisation it wishes. However, Ukraine has a long history of close ties with Russia, and any move to ignore the historical ties will enrage Russia. 

Zelenskiy should have considered the ramifications of going against Russia. The EU and NATO’s “false assertions” led him to feel he had the required support to combat Russia, which backfired spectacularly. Instead of listening to those with vested interests against Russia, Zelenskiy should have considered the interests of the Ukrainian people as a whole. 

In the wake of Russia’s conflict with Ukraine, Zelenskiy declared a few days ago that he had simmered down about Ukraine’s quest to join NATO. He also stated that the alliance is wary of difficult issues and conflict with Russia. He also did not want to be a country that was pleading for help on its knees. He was willing to talk about the control of Russian-backed separatist regions in eastern Ukraine, which may pave the way for peace talks with Moscow.

Before Russia began an attack on his country, Zelenskiy should have comprehended this. The current trajectory indicates that Putin intends to utterly overrun Ukraine. The West’s unwillingness to participate in this conflict, particularly NATO, as well as continuous economic sanctions against individuals deemed close to Putin, propels the Russian strongman to go all-out to win it.

History has shown on several occasions that when windows of opportunity to resolve conflicts are lost, a humanitarian crisis will emerge. That is precisely what is happening in Ukraine at the moment. – March 13, 2022. 


Source:https://focusmalaysia.my/zelenskiy-made-a-fatal-mistake-by-trusting-nato-part-1/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i...

The by-election in Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) and the Indian electorate

  I was born in Malaysia, belonging to the Indian ethnic group, which constitutes approximately 7% of the country's total population. My durable credence is that I am Malaysian first and foremost, and only then do I identify myself as Indian. Regrettably, it saddens me to witness and hear about the actions of certain politicians who question my loyalty to Malaysia. What is even more disheartening is that some Malaysians have been influenced by the manipulative rhetoric of these self-serving politicians. Recently, I have observed numerous discussions on both mainstream and online news platforms regarding the recognition and inclusion of Indians by ruling parties. Surprisingly, even the opposition has displayed a significant interest in the welfare of Indians. Upon contemplating the reasons behind this sudden surge in attention towards Indians, it becomes evident that it is primarily driven by the upcoming Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) by-election. It is noteworthy that such ...