Skip to main content

My Country, My Leaders - PART 2


'We must each always think first of Malaysia, of the national need and least of ourselves. Everyone must try to help and see that the people are one-minded, with loyalty and one aim, to make Malaysia – the land we love-a happy abode for all of us. If we all do this then we can guarantee liberty, security, prosperity, and happiness for the future.’
Tunku Abdul Rahman

Our founding father of this nation had a clear vision for our country. Even though, we are independence state but our minds still by colonized by ‘modern’ domestic imperialists. As Tunku has quoted we have to put the interest of this nation above own interest.

Our love for this nation is unconditional. Further, he has aspired that if all Malaysians can work together than the country will be prospered in future.

Our paramount duty as the citizens of this nation is to keep the sovereignty and create a better place for our next generation.

Whether our country is on the right path to achieve this aspiration?

Do we have the visionary and patriotic leaders to materialize this aim?

We are just the ordinary citizens. We don’t understand the political games. But, we care for this country. We desire to have leaders who are care for this beloved nation.

Our current and future economic situation is so bleak. Ordinary people lost their jobs. Now, families with more than three children in a real hardship. Rural folks facing unprecedented adversity.

We just wanted to know from our leaders, is there any solution for these problems?

Nelson Mandela in his autobiography has cited that the most enduring example of leadership and affirmation of human dignity in the face of racial oppression (during the apartheid era), lies in the transformation that he underwent during almost three decades in jail. Further he stressed that his contribution is to be assessed as somebody who carried out decision taken by that collective.

Nelson Mandela is a statesman who scarified his life for his people and to his nation as a whole. In Malaysia, our founding fathers including our first Prime Minister had such a quality. Most recently, we have witnessed, Tok Guru Nik Aziz possessed such an eminence.

Leaders must or at least willing to sacrifice for their nation. Great leaders like Mandela, Gandhi, Tunku, Jose Rizal and Tok Guru Nik Aziz had shown this characteristic. Therefore, they are highly revered as the ultimate asset in their country.

Al-Farabi, one of the greatest Islamic philosophers, had alluded that a good state is a natural state and it is only natural for human beings to want to be happy and further he said it is the responsibility of the state to insure that its citizens be happy.

As the citizens of this nation, are we happy now? The answer is no.

With the current political and economic uncertainty, we are not happy. In accordance with Al-Farabi, it is the state’s/leaders’ obligation to make its citizens happy.

For an example, recently, the notion of rule of law is not been observed properly. Even though the law must treat everyone equally and the law must be supreme but lately these notions were become less eminent.

We are enormously understanding the difficult phase facing by this nation. We are willing to do anything for the benefit of this nation. But, we also expecting our leaders to  contribute by scarifying their personal interest for the betterment of this country.

Political morality is a practice should have possessed by all leaders. Some good statesmen like Mandela, Gandhi and Tok Guru Nik Aziz had infatuated with such a quality. Their political judgments and policies are based on the political ethics.

Further, a good leader should also have the character of accountability, transparency and integrity. In past three decades, we are lacking of such leaders in this country.

In a democratic process, the leaders are representative of their people. They are voices of people. They must listen and accommodate to the public wishes.  Not the other way around. They are servants to the people. A good leader will command his people wisely but an autocratic leader will rule his own people deviously. The latter will be enthroned unexpectedly and the punishment will be austere.

In a mature democracy like in United Kingdom (UK), the people role to determine their destiny is very essential. Former Prime Minister, David Cameron had a referendum on 23 March 2016, as a part of his election promise. He is very much in favour for UK to be remained within European Union (EU). But, the people went against with his wishes. He resigned immediately and Theresa May becomes the new Prime Minster.

In 2017, she called for a snap election to get a good mandate from people to execute her plan for Brexit. But, her conservative party’s lost majority in Parliament. Later, her proposals were defeated. In 2019, she resigned and Boris Johnson elected as Conservative leader. He becomes new Prime Minster. He called for a snap election with one promise that he needs a full mandate to take out UK from EU. His party won landslide victory and on 31 January this year, UK is out of EU.

This Brexit saga shows that the leaders have to obey and accomplish the aspirations of people. If they fail, then through the general election these leaders can be voted out by the same people.

Most of the corrupted and autocratic leaders have had the mind of imperialist. With the power and money, they possessed, they falsely believed they are supreme. The history had proven in multiple occasions that these leaders will be removed and punished by people. For example, Charles Taylor from Liberia and Ferdinand Marcos.

John A. Hobson is an English economist. His book, Imperialism was published in 1902. He argued that, ‘the services offer the cleanest and most natural support to an aggressive foreign policy; expansion of the empire appeals powerfully to the aristocracy and the professional classes by offering new and ever-growing fields for the honorable and profitable employment of their sons.’

The ruling class always has the mind of imperialist. The elite group in any society wants to control the public and nation for their own political and economic gains. For them, the ‘outsiders’ are subservient to them and they have the right on them forever.  They will control the public with money and reward them with aids. Further, they will use race and religion as factors to influence the public’s mind by creating anxiety and fear to get their support to rule them.

Immanuel Wallerstein is a sociologist. He defined "a world-system is a social system, one that has boundaries, structures, member groups, rules of legitimization, and coherence. Its life is made up of the conflicting forces which hold it together by tension and tear it apart as each group seeks eternally to remold it to its advantage. It has the characteristics of an organism, in that is has a lifespan over which its characteristics change in some respects and remain stable in others… Life within it is largely self-contained, and the dynamics of its development are largely internal."

Based on his theory, his political arguments are firstly, the States are used by class forces to pursue their interest. Secondly, imperialism means the control of dominant countries on the weaker states. Thirdly, hegemony define as the dominant state briefly outshining others and conserve power for their gain. This power is impermanent as to the class struggle which will flow with technical rewards. He concluded that it is a class tussle.

The rise and fall of any dynasty or empires in the world theater is inevitable. When they fall, they will create a hostile environment to be retained in power. Naturally that will work against them. The fall of British and Mughal empires and the political parties like Kuomintang, LDP and Congress are the evidence. This theory illustrates that position and power in politics is not perpetual. The good deeds that the leaders have contributed to the people and country is always well reminisced and they are considered as the statesmen.  

In a nutshell, Malaysia needs good leaders. These leaders must be noble and patriotic people. They must be visionary.  The sovereignty of this country is paramount. The leaders must protect the interest of this nation from emerging new neo-colonialist. The main reason for many failed states arisen from leaders who are incompetent, corrupted and egocentric. These leaders put their interest more than state’s interest.

© Copyrights Reserved. 2020.
19.05.2020
Kuala Lumpur

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Terrorism in Africa

According to state.gov, ISIS was defeated a few years ago. However, the organization's presence and existence remain conspicuous in Africa. Ongoing conflicts in Somalia, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso demonstrate that ISIS has shifted its focus away from Iraq and Syria. Although ISIS lacks a clear hierarchy like Al-Qaeda, its followers and supporters wholeheartedly believe in its strong ideology. In 2014, the United States led the formation of a broad international coalition known as 'The Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS' to combat the organization during the height of the Syrian and Iraqi conflict. The primary objectives of this 83-member coalition are to degrade and defeat ISIS, which poses a threat to international peace and security. ISIS has brought thousands of foreign fighters from around the world to combat zones like Syria and Iraq, and it has used technology to promote its violent extremist ideology and instigate terrorist attacks. For example, t

Sedition Act 1948 should have been repealed a long time ago. But why?

THE Sedition Act 1948 is a legislative measure that was enacted in Malaysia during the colonial era, designed to curb any form of speech or expression that was deemed to be seditious in nature with the aim of maintaining public order and security. The Sedition Act has been subject to much debate and criticism, with some arguing that it is a violation of freedom of speech and expression. Despite this, the Act remains in force in Malaysia to this day, albeit with some amendments made over the years. Although I concur with the abolition of this Act, it is imperative that a comparable new legislation be enacted to address the escalating prevalence of racially and religiously bigoted remarks that have been unsettling our distinctive multicultural and multi-religious society as of late. An instance that exemplifies the prudent decision-making of the governing body is the substitution of the Internal Security Act of 1960 with the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA). This rep

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i