Skip to main content

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives.

The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals.

Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors.

Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare.

The 9/11 attacks

The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the most lethal terrorist incident of the century.

In the aftermath, terrorist organisations and their affiliates have adapted and transformed, presenting significant challenges for intelligence and security agencies tasked with monitoring their activities.

Typically, these agencies develop strategies only after terrorist attacks occur, which limits their ability to pre-emptively understand the operational methods employed by these groups.

The recent attacks on Hezbollah by Israel in Lebanon have changed that perception.

Notably, Malaysia does not officially classify Hezbollah as a terrorist entity, in contrast to several nations such as the US, the European Union, and Canada, which have designated it as a terrorist group. Malaysia opts to maintain diplomatic relations with Lebanon, where Hezbollah plays a crucial role both politically and militarily.

This situation prompts an inquiry into whether Malaysian intelligence and security agencies might adopt the counter-terrorism strategies employed by Israel in Lebanon, or if there exists a risk that terrorist groups within Malaysia could replicate Israeli tactics against our leaders and security forces, including the police.

Lebanon

In recent days, Lebanon has witnessed a series of lethal assaults involving explosive devices, which Lebanese authorities have attributed to Israel. Over two days, detonations from pagers and walkie-talkies resulted in considerable casualties.

The initial wave of attacks focused on pagers, claiming the lives of at least 12 individuals and injuring thousands more. The subsequent day saw walkie-talkies explode, leading to a minimum of 20 fatalities and over 450 injuries.

These assaults predominantly targeted members of Hezbollah, a significant militant group and political entity in Lebanon that is backed by Iran.

Although Israel has not formally acknowledged responsibility, there is a prevailing belief that Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency, orchestrated these operations.

This series of attacks is perceived as a showcase of Israel’s technological prowess and a tactical manoeuvre in the ongoing hostilities with Hezbollah. The incidents have heightened concerns regarding escalating tensions in the region, with Lebanon’s foreign minister expressing apprehensions about the possibility of a war.

The explosions have been characterised as one of the most significant security breaches for Hezbollah. Both the Lebanese government and Hezbollah have condemned the attacks, with the militants pledging to retaliate.

These developments underscore the intricate and ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, further intensifying regional tensions and raising alarms about potential escalation.

The trends

The evolution of modern terrorism presents a complex and multifaceted narrative that has undergone significant transformations over the last few centuries. Current patterns in terrorism reveal a transition towards a broader and more decentralised array of violent extremism.

A marked increase in right-wing extremism has been observed, particularly in the US and Europe, where such groups frequently espouse anti-government, racist, and xenophobic beliefs.

Historically, terrorism has manifested in cyclical waves, each spanning approximately 40 years. The ongoing wave, characterised by religious extremism, is in its third decade.

Should it adhere to the historical trend of previous waves, it may reach its conclusion by the mid-2020s, potentially paving the way for a subsequent wave.

The trajectory of future terrorism is influenced by five principal trends: diversity, decentralisation, democratisation, disinformation, and lethal tactics.

These trends indicate that terrorist organisations are becoming increasingly heterogeneous in their makeup, less centralised in their operational frameworks, more accessible to a wider demographic, more dependent on misinformation, and exhibiting heightened lethality.

Such developments underscore the dynamic nature of terrorism and the imperative for adaptive counter-strategies to address these emerging threats.

Technology and terrorism

Both terrorist organisations and intelligence agencies utilise cutting-edge technologies to gain a competitive advantage over the other.

Terrorist groups are increasingly engaging in cyber warfare to disrupt essential infrastructure, expropriate sensitive information, and instil fear within populations.

They utilise encrypted communication applications and dark web resources to organise their operations while evading detection.

Furthermore, social media and digital platforms serve as vital tools for propaganda dissemination, recruitment, and radicalisation efforts.

The use of drones for reconnaissance and offensive operations, along with the technological enhancement of improvised explosive devices (IEDs), has become commonplace.

Additionally, cryptocurrencies and online fundraising initiatives play a crucial role in financing their activities.

On the other hand, intelligence agencies employ advanced surveillance technologies, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, to monitor communications and track the movements of terrorist entities.

These agencies are engaged in the development of sophisticated cyber defence systems and offensive strategies to mitigate cyber threats posed by terrorist organisations.

The application of big data analytics and predictive modelling is instrumental in identifying potential risks and thwarting attacks. Intelligence agencies also utilise these technologies for reconnaissance, surveillance, and precision strikes against key terrorist figures.

Moreover, there are ongoing efforts to counteract terrorist propaganda through digital campaigns and interventions on social media platforms.

This technological landscape creates a constantly evolving battlefield, compelling both parties to adapt and refine their strategies in response to one another’s actions.

Conclusion

The phenomenon of terrorism is in a constant state of transformation. Historically, security and intelligence agencies have adapted their strategies in response to the tactics employed by terrorist organisations, often learning from the aftermath of successful attacks.

However, recent events in Lebanon have significantly altered the dynamics of terrorism, as intelligence agencies have effectively disrupted the communication channels utilised by these groups, instilling a sense of fear among them.

While this development may hinder terrorist operations, it is crucial to recognise that these groups have a history of innovation in executing attacks.

Consequently, global security and intelligence agencies must take heed of the lessons learnt from the Lebanese situation to effectively mitigate and neutralise the activities of terrorist organisations both now and in the future.

These terrorists are deeply entrenched in their malevolent ideologies, often dismissing the principles of the rule of law.

Therefore, it raises the question of why we should extend empathy and compassion towards these individuals when advocating for justice based on such principles.

Source: https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/720085

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Two Tales, Two Leaders - PART 1

Man has dual nature; he is both his own person and a member of his country. On the one hand, the law must protect the individual from the injustices of the multitude.  History has shown how individuals fall prey to mass perversity, their crime being simply a refusal to conform to the beliefs and prejudices of the majority. Anwar Ibrahim, The Asian Renaissance, 1997., Page 63. The value system and ethical code therefore determine the success or failure of corrective measures. If the value system is wrong, corrective measures will not be productive or will be only slightly productive. When the value system motivates, very little corrective measures are needed. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, The Malay Dilemma, 1970., Pages 172-173. Introduction Malaysia is our motherland. We love our country. This country has so much of wealth. Even though, Malaysia has agonized considerably in past three decades because of the malpractices of the corrupted characters but she is never fail t...