Skip to main content

War-torn Afghanistan: Key terror groups “butchering” for supremacy (Part 1)

 THE last C-17 military cargo plane departed Hamid Karzai International Airport on Aug 30, as part of the US troops’ withdrawal plan from Afghanistan, which began gradually in February.

This apparently brought the US’s longest conflict to a close.

Many leaders from Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) member countries welcomed this as a victory for the Taliban, while others viewed it as a defeat for the “mighty” US, citing its failure in the Vietnam War as an example.

The perception was that after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, things would rebound, but that did not happen.

The terrorist attacks

Taliban has been attacked by other terrorist groups such as Islamic State in Khorasan Province (ISIS-K), which opposes Taliban doctrine and leaders, in various parts of Afghanistan since September.

Not only were Taliban militants killed but also innocent individuals including children and women. They were perceived as collateral damage.

On September 18, at least seven people were killed and 30 others were injured in a series of explosions in Jalalabad, the capital of Nanjarhar province, and Kabul’s Dasht-e-Barchi neighbourhood in eastern Afghanistan. ISIS-K claimed responsibility.

In a series of attacks since the Taliban took control of the country in mid-August, attackers hit Taliban vehicles in eastern Afghanistan on September 22, killing at least two Taliban militants and three civilians, including two children.

These attacks were also alleged to have been carried out by ISIS-K, which is based in eastern Afghanistan.

The Taliban and ISIS-K have long been rivals and the former is under pressure to control the latter, in part to keep a pledge made to the international community that it would not allow terrorist attacks to be staged from Afghan terrain.

Several people were killed and at least 20 others were injured after an explosion occurred outside Kabul’s Eid Gah Mosque during a memorial service for Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid’s mother on Oct 3.

Since Taliban’s ascendancy, ISIS-K fighters have upped their attacks against them.

The likelihood of a larger clash between the two groups has increased as a result of the surge. It also raises the question of whether the Taliban is capable of maintaining Afghanistan’s peace and security.

On Oct 8, ISIS-K claimed responsibility for a suicide bombing at the Gozar-e-Sayed Abad Mosque in Kunduz Province, that killed more than 40 people and injured 143 others.

The mosque is frequently visited by Shia Muslims. According to ISIS-K, the attack was aimed at both Shia Muslims and the Taliban, who appeared to be willing to deport Uighur Muslims.

Since the Taliban took power, similar violent attacks against Shia Muslims and other minorities have intensified. Following a 20-year insurgency, these attacks severely erode the Taliban’s legitimacy as a guarantor of a competent administration.

The question is whether the Taliban is sincere enough to follow through on its commitments under the Doha Agreement. Plus, will Qatar play a pivotal role in pressuring the Taliban to adhere to the agreement?

ISIS-K, more radical than Taliban?

ISIS-K is a regional affiliate of Islamic State that operates mostly in Afghanistan. With the exodus of Tehrik-e-Taliban (TTP), Al Qaeda, and Taliban fighters active in Afghanistan and Pakistan, ISIS-K filled the void in 2014.

ISIS-K is an Islamic State “wilayah” or province, and Khorasan refers to a historical territory that spanned in areas covering Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Iran.

Pakistan was initially added to the original group until a separate Pakistan section was established in May 2019.

According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report, this terrorist outfit carried out 83 operations between January 2020 and July 2021, killing 309 people.

Since January last year there have been 13 attacks or violent skirmishes against Taliban forces.

ISIS-K considers almost everyone as its adversaries and has attacked Afghan security forces, its politicians and ministries, the Taliban, religious minorities like as Shiites and Sikhs, US and NATO troops, and foreign aid organisations.

This group reportedly also targetted girls’ schools, hospitals and even a maternity facility, killing pregnant women and nurses.

They operate in eastern Afghanistan, particularly provinces such as Nangahar, Kunar, Jowzjan, Paktia, Kunduz, and Herat, which are near to a drug and human trafficking routes into and out of Pakistan.

It is the most extreme and violent of Afghanistan’s Islamist insurgent groups to date.

Moreover, it even considers Taliban terrorists as “apostates”, making their assassination “permissible” in their eyes.

This group also accuses the Taliban of giving up on jihad and the battlefield, in favour of a negotiated peace agreement.

ISIS-K, in my opinion, will continue to pose a danger to the Taliban rule, and the tribal structure will make it more difficult for them to rule Afghanistan effectively.

The destruction of the Caliphate in Iraq and Syria will give a framework for them to build another Caliphate in this region.

The persistent influx of foreign terrorist fighters (FTFs) into ISIS-K is evidence that the fight between the Taliban and ISIS-K will be Afghanistan’s next civil war. – Oct 25, 2021.

Source: https://focusmalaysia.my/war-torn-afghanistan-key-terror-groups-butchering-for-supremacy-part-1/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i...

The by-election in Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) and the Indian electorate

  I was born in Malaysia, belonging to the Indian ethnic group, which constitutes approximately 7% of the country's total population. My durable credence is that I am Malaysian first and foremost, and only then do I identify myself as Indian. Regrettably, it saddens me to witness and hear about the actions of certain politicians who question my loyalty to Malaysia. What is even more disheartening is that some Malaysians have been influenced by the manipulative rhetoric of these self-serving politicians. Recently, I have observed numerous discussions on both mainstream and online news platforms regarding the recognition and inclusion of Indians by ruling parties. Surprisingly, even the opposition has displayed a significant interest in the welfare of Indians. Upon contemplating the reasons behind this sudden surge in attention towards Indians, it becomes evident that it is primarily driven by the upcoming Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) by-election. It is noteworthy that such ...