Skip to main content

War-torn Afghanistan: Key terror groups “butchering” for supremacy (Part 1)

 THE last C-17 military cargo plane departed Hamid Karzai International Airport on Aug 30, as part of the US troops’ withdrawal plan from Afghanistan, which began gradually in February.

This apparently brought the US’s longest conflict to a close.

Many leaders from Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) member countries welcomed this as a victory for the Taliban, while others viewed it as a defeat for the “mighty” US, citing its failure in the Vietnam War as an example.

The perception was that after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, things would rebound, but that did not happen.

The terrorist attacks

Taliban has been attacked by other terrorist groups such as Islamic State in Khorasan Province (ISIS-K), which opposes Taliban doctrine and leaders, in various parts of Afghanistan since September.

Not only were Taliban militants killed but also innocent individuals including children and women. They were perceived as collateral damage.

On September 18, at least seven people were killed and 30 others were injured in a series of explosions in Jalalabad, the capital of Nanjarhar province, and Kabul’s Dasht-e-Barchi neighbourhood in eastern Afghanistan. ISIS-K claimed responsibility.

In a series of attacks since the Taliban took control of the country in mid-August, attackers hit Taliban vehicles in eastern Afghanistan on September 22, killing at least two Taliban militants and three civilians, including two children.

These attacks were also alleged to have been carried out by ISIS-K, which is based in eastern Afghanistan.

The Taliban and ISIS-K have long been rivals and the former is under pressure to control the latter, in part to keep a pledge made to the international community that it would not allow terrorist attacks to be staged from Afghan terrain.

Several people were killed and at least 20 others were injured after an explosion occurred outside Kabul’s Eid Gah Mosque during a memorial service for Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid’s mother on Oct 3.

Since Taliban’s ascendancy, ISIS-K fighters have upped their attacks against them.

The likelihood of a larger clash between the two groups has increased as a result of the surge. It also raises the question of whether the Taliban is capable of maintaining Afghanistan’s peace and security.

On Oct 8, ISIS-K claimed responsibility for a suicide bombing at the Gozar-e-Sayed Abad Mosque in Kunduz Province, that killed more than 40 people and injured 143 others.

The mosque is frequently visited by Shia Muslims. According to ISIS-K, the attack was aimed at both Shia Muslims and the Taliban, who appeared to be willing to deport Uighur Muslims.

Since the Taliban took power, similar violent attacks against Shia Muslims and other minorities have intensified. Following a 20-year insurgency, these attacks severely erode the Taliban’s legitimacy as a guarantor of a competent administration.

The question is whether the Taliban is sincere enough to follow through on its commitments under the Doha Agreement. Plus, will Qatar play a pivotal role in pressuring the Taliban to adhere to the agreement?

ISIS-K, more radical than Taliban?

ISIS-K is a regional affiliate of Islamic State that operates mostly in Afghanistan. With the exodus of Tehrik-e-Taliban (TTP), Al Qaeda, and Taliban fighters active in Afghanistan and Pakistan, ISIS-K filled the void in 2014.

ISIS-K is an Islamic State “wilayah” or province, and Khorasan refers to a historical territory that spanned in areas covering Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Iran.

Pakistan was initially added to the original group until a separate Pakistan section was established in May 2019.

According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report, this terrorist outfit carried out 83 operations between January 2020 and July 2021, killing 309 people.

Since January last year there have been 13 attacks or violent skirmishes against Taliban forces.

ISIS-K considers almost everyone as its adversaries and has attacked Afghan security forces, its politicians and ministries, the Taliban, religious minorities like as Shiites and Sikhs, US and NATO troops, and foreign aid organisations.

This group reportedly also targetted girls’ schools, hospitals and even a maternity facility, killing pregnant women and nurses.

They operate in eastern Afghanistan, particularly provinces such as Nangahar, Kunar, Jowzjan, Paktia, Kunduz, and Herat, which are near to a drug and human trafficking routes into and out of Pakistan.

It is the most extreme and violent of Afghanistan’s Islamist insurgent groups to date.

Moreover, it even considers Taliban terrorists as “apostates”, making their assassination “permissible” in their eyes.

This group also accuses the Taliban of giving up on jihad and the battlefield, in favour of a negotiated peace agreement.

ISIS-K, in my opinion, will continue to pose a danger to the Taliban rule, and the tribal structure will make it more difficult for them to rule Afghanistan effectively.

The destruction of the Caliphate in Iraq and Syria will give a framework for them to build another Caliphate in this region.

The persistent influx of foreign terrorist fighters (FTFs) into ISIS-K is evidence that the fight between the Taliban and ISIS-K will be Afghanistan’s next civil war. – Oct 25, 2021.

Source: https://focusmalaysia.my/war-torn-afghanistan-key-terror-groups-butchering-for-supremacy-part-1/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.