The terrorist incident that occurred last Saturday in Mulhouse, France, highlights the intricate challenges associated with managing national security threats stemming from extremism. The perpetrator, an Algerian individual with a documented history of extremist affiliations and mental health concerns, has reignited essential discussions regarding the effectiveness of national security measures in addressing threats from individuals who, despite prior identification by authorities, can still inflict harm. In this context, Malaysia's national security framework faces a significant dilemma: how to ensure public safety while also protecting civil liberties. A central topic of debate in Malaysia regarding national security is the contentious Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA), which empowers law enforcement agencies with extensive authority to detain individuals suspected of involvement in national security threats. This legislation has attracted considerable...
Extremism, in both political and religious contexts, represents a considerable danger to social cohesion and national safety. Worldwide, instances of unrestrained radicalisation have demonstrated the potential to undermine nations and diminish democratic values. Malaysia, characterised by its diverse cultural background and moderate religious stance, needs to take the initiative in confronting the rising threats of extremism domestically. By analysing the situations in neighbouring nations such as Singapore, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, valuable insights can be gained regarding the perils of complacency and the necessity of overseeing hate speech, religious instruction, and political discourse. The case of Singapore Singapore, recognised for its rigorous legal framework and dedication to fostering interfaith harmony, has encountered its own issues related to radicalisation. Despite its image as a stable nation, the city-state has experienced threats posed by extremist discourse that can f...