Skip to main content

SDR 2025 and Malaysia: Adapting to the New Defence Landscape – Part 1

The release of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR) 2025 marks a pivotal moment in the United Kingdom’s military and strategic recalibration.  

It outlines a vision of a more agile, AI-enabled, and technologically dominant force, prepared for high-intensity conflicts and grey-zone threats alike. It doubles down on NATO leadership, increases readiness postures, and makes heavy commitments to defence industrial growth, innovation, and autonomy.

For Malaysia, while the geostrategic theatre differs significantly from Europe, the undercurrents of SDR 2025 are deeply relevant.

The Indo-Pacific is undergoing its own transformation: rising great power competition, cyber threats, grey-zone coercion, and the militarization of disputed maritime areas particularly in the South China Sea.

As such, the SDR 2025 offers critical lessons for Malaysia to consider, both in structure and substance.

Increased Readiness and Force Modernization

The United Kingdom’s focus on “readiness at scale” centres on enhancing the ability to rapidly deploy forces, shorten mobilisation timelines, and maintain equipment and personnel at a high level of combat preparedness.

This strategic shift is supported by significant investments in logistics resilience, rapid deployment infrastructure, and a more capable reserve force, enabling the UK to respond swiftly and effectively to emerging threats across multiple domains.

In contrast, Malaysia’s current defence posture remains primarily oriented toward peacetime deterrence, border security, and internal stability.

This traditional approach is increasingly insufficient given the growing complexity of regional security dynamics, particularly in the maritime domain and the broader Indo-Pacific theatre. To meet these evolving challenges, Malaysia must undertake a substantial recalibration of its force readiness model.

One key step is to establish modular, rapid-reaction units that are capable of operating in hybrid threat environments.

These units should be designed for quick deployment and tailored for operations in and around critical maritime chokepoints such as the Strait of Malacca, where the risk of grey-zone activities and asymmetric threats is rising.

Furthermore, Malaysia should increase investments in military mobility and logistics infrastructure, particularly in East Malaysia (Sabah and Sarawak) due to their proximity to potential flashpoints in the South China Sea.

Prepositioned supplies, forward-operating facilities, and improved transport networks would significantly enhance operational flexibility and response times.

Therefore, the expansion and modernisation of the Territorial Army (Askar Wataniah) should be a priority.

This includes not only strengthening traditional reserve components but also creating new hybrid reserve forces trained in emerging domains such as cyber operations, drone warfare, and electronic warfare.

These capabilities would allow Malaysia to build a more adaptive, resilient force structure better suited to the demands of modern conflict.

Technology-Led Warfare and AI Integration

The SDR 2025 places strong emphasis on artificial intelligence (AI), drones, uncrewed systems, and data as the foundation of modern combat power.

The United Kingdom is actively investing in these areas, establishing a Defence Uncrewed Systems Centre, accelerating AI integration across all military domains, and expanding its arsenal of autonomous platforms, ranging from underwater drones to AI-powered intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems.

Malaysia, however, remains behind the curve in adopting these transformative technologies. AI integration into defence systems, local drone manufacturing, and the digitalisation of battlefield operations are all still in their infancy.

To address this gap, Malaysia must begin by establishing a dedicated Malaysian Defence AI Centre. This entity is potentially housed under the Ministry of Defence’s Science and Technology Research Institute for Defence (STRIDE) that could serve as the central hub for AI projects, defence-focused data analytics, and the coordination of emerging technology initiatives.

Alongside this, Malaysia should develop a comprehensive national drone strategy tailored for defence needs.

This strategy should prioritise the development and deployment of surveillance UAVs to enhance maritime domain awareness, particularly in contested waters, and explore capabilities such as loitering munitions and AI-assisted targeting systems to bolster operational effectiveness.

Equally important is fostering a defence innovation ecosystem. Malaysia should incentivize local tech startups, university spin-offs, and research institutions to co-develop dual-use technologies that can be rapidly prototyped, tested, and fielded.

Lessons can be drawn from Ukraine’s model of agile defence innovation, where close collaboration between the military and civilian tech sectors has yielded impactful solutions in record time.

Embracing such a model would position Malaysia to better respond to the fast-evolving nature of future warfare.

A Moment for Strategic Courage

SDR 2025 serves as more than just a roadmap for the United Kingdom’s military development as it signals a broader transformation in global defence thinking.

The future of warfare is increasingly defined by digital technologies, autonomous systems, and resilient multinational alliances.

While Malaysia may be geographically distant from NATO’s operational theatres, it is undeniably situated within the Indo-Pacific, a region at the heart of emerging strategic competition.

To remain relevant, secure, and operationally capable in this rapidly evolving environment, Malaysia must embrace a fundamental shift in its defence posture.

This requires thinking innovatively, investing decisively in next-generation capabilities, partnering strategically with like-minded nations, and modernizing urgently across all domains i.e. land, sea, air, cyber, and space.

23.06.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© All rights are reserved.

https://focusmalaysia.my/sdr-2025-and-malaysia-adapting-to-the-new-defence-landscape-part-1/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives. The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals. Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors. Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare. The 9/11 attacks The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the m...
Post a Comment
Read more