Skip to main content

Kinetic and Non-Kinetic Warfare: Malaysia’s Preparedness

 In today’s rapidly evolving security landscape, the traditional concepts of warfare are no longer confined to tanks rolling across borders or fighter jets dominating the skies.

Instead, the battlefield has expanded to include invisible digital fronts and subtle psychological operations that can cripple a nation without a single bullet fired.

These two overarching categories, namely kinetic and non-kinetic warfare, serve as the dual foundations of contemporary conflict.

For Malaysia, a nation situated in a region rife with geopolitical complexities, understanding and preparing for both forms of warfare is no longer optional; it is imperative for national survival.

Understanding Kinetic Warfare

Kinetic warfare is what most people traditionally think of when they hear the word “war.” It encompasses the use of direct, physical force through missiles, artillery, infantry, naval battleships, and aerial bombardments.

This form of warfare seeks to destroy or incapacitate the enemy’s physical capabilities, such as military infrastructure, personnel, or critical assets.

Recent conflicts, including the ongoing war in Ukraine, demonstrate that kinetic warfare remains a dominant factor. The destruction of military equipment, airbases, and infrastructure through coordinated strikes or drone attacks clearly illustrates kinetic action.

Nonetheless, despite the evolution of methods, including the deployment of drone swarms and precision-guided munitions, the fundamental aspect continues to be the tangible effect on the opponent.

For Malaysia, kinetic threats are very real. From territorial disputes in the South China Sea to the potential for terrorism and insurgency within its borders, physical confrontations and security breaches remain plausible risks.

Our armed forces must maintain strong, well-equipped conventional capabilities to deter and respond to such threats.

The Rise of Non-Kinetic Warfare

However, kinetic warfare is only one half of the equation. Non-kinetic warfare operates in the realm of information, cyber, economic pressure, and psychological operations.

These tactics aim to weaken an adversary without engaging in open combat, often by targeting a society’s trust in its institutions, disrupting critical infrastructure through cyberattacks, spreading misinformation to sow discord, or leveraging economic vulnerabilities.

Non-kinetic warfare can be subtle, hard to detect, and devastatingly effective. The cyberattacks on critical infrastructure such as power grids, financial systems, and communication networks can bring a nation to its knees without a single missile launch.

The weaponization of social media to spread false narratives can divide a population and destabilize governance.

Malaysia, with its rapidly digitizing economy and society, is especially vulnerable to these threats. Cyberattacks on government databases, financial institutions, or energy supplies could cause widespread chaos.

Moreover, the proliferation of misinformation and influence campaigns can exacerbate ethnic and religious tensions, undermining social cohesion and political stability.

Why Malaysia Must Address Both Fronts

Ignoring either kinetic or non-kinetic threats in today’s interconnected world would be a grave mistake. Malaysia’s strategic position, diverse population, and economic ambitions make it a potential target for a wide array of hostile actions.

The hybrid nature of modern conflicts means adversaries may blend physical attacks with cyber and psychological tactics, exploiting weaknesses wherever they find them.

Recent events worldwide, such as Operation Spiderweb, a bold Ukrainian drone strike deep inside Russian territory, highlights the growing synergy between kinetic and non-kinetic elements in contemporary warfare.

The use of drones (kinetic tools) controlled via sophisticated software over mobile networks (a non-kinetic communication medium) exemplifies this fusion.

Such operations challenge traditional defence strategies that focus mainly on physical borders and military hardware.

Building a Holistic Defence Strategy

To safeguard its sovereignty and citizens, Malaysia must develop a comprehensive approach that integrates kinetic and non-kinetic defence measures.

On the kinetic side, modernizing and enhancing the Malaysian Armed Forces with advanced surveillance, missile defence systems, and rapid response capabilities is critical.

The emergence of drone warfare, as shown by recent conflicts, demands the establishment of specialized units trained to detect, intercept, and neutralize unmanned aerial threats.

Such capabilities are vital to protecting military assets, critical infrastructure, and urban centres from sudden kinetic attacks.

On the non-kinetic front, Malaysia needs to strengthen its cybersecurity infrastructure. This means not just investing in firewalls and encryption, but also creating proactive intelligence units capable of anticipating and countering cyber threats before they manifest.

Public-private partnerships will be crucial, as much of the country’s critical infrastructure is managed by private entities.

Equally important is enhancing resilience against information warfare. Malaysia’s social fabric is delicate, and the weaponization of social media to spread disinformation could have serious consequences.

Investing in media literacy campaigns, improving government transparency, and fostering trust between the state and its citizens can reduce the effectiveness of psychological operations aimed at sowing division.

The Role of Intelligence and Coordination

Effective defence against modern threats requires seamless coordination between Malaysia’s intelligence agencies, military, law enforcement, and civilian sectors.

Intelligence must go beyond traditional espionage and border surveillance; it must include cyber intelligence, social media monitoring, and analysis of emerging technological threats.

Malaysia should consider establishing a dedicated special task force focusing on drone warfare and cyber defence.

This unit would bring together experts in electronics, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and psychological operations to detect, analyse, and respond rapidly to both kinetic and non-kinetic threats.

A Call to Action

Kinetic and non-kinetic warfare are no longer distinct realms, but interconnected aspects of a new, multifaceted battlefield.

Malaysia stands at a crossroads where preparedness and innovation will determine its ability to safeguard national security and maintain peace.

By recognizing the evolving nature of conflict and investing strategically in both kinetic defences and non-kinetic resilience, Malaysia can build a robust shield against future threats.

The time to act is now.

Failure to adapt will leave Malaysia vulnerable to the very kinds of hybrid attacks already reshaping the global order. In this new era of warfare, a proactive, integrated approach is not just wise as it is essential.

Kuala Lumpur.

15.6.2025


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives. The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals. Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors. Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare. The 9/11 attacks The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the m...