Skip to main content

Strategic Tariffs, Stronger America

As the world enters a new era of economic competition and geopolitical uncertainty, the United States faces a critical question: will it continue to rely on fragile international supply chains and outdated trade assumptions, or will it seize this moment to rebuild domestic strength?

President Trump’s sweeping 2025 tariff agenda answers that question emphatically and despite controversy, it’s the right move for America’s economic future and global leadership.

The latest analysis from The Tax Foundation’s 2025 Trade Policy Impact Report, one of the most respected nonpartisan sources on tax and trade policy, outlines the far-reaching effects of these tariffs.

The findings show that while there are short-term costs, the strategic benefits far outweigh them especially if the tariffs are implemented fully and allowed to reshape the foundations of U.S. economic policy.

A Transformational Tariff Strategy

President Trump’s proposed tariffs include those under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), targeting countries tied to fentanyl trafficking such as China, as well as broad national security tariffs on steel, aluminium, and auto imports from virtually all trading partners.

If enacted in full, these tariffs would raise the average effective tariff rate to 12.1% the highest since 1941 and bring in nearly $2.0 trillion in federal revenue over the next decade on a conventional basis, or $1.3 trillion dynamically after accounting for behavioural responses, according to The Tax Foundation.

Critics argue that these tariffs would reduce U.S. GDP by 0.8%, but this figure lacks historical context. The same critics failed to object when decades of offshoring and unfair trade led to the closure of tens of thousands of U.S. factories and the loss of millions of middle-class jobs.

A temporary GDP adjustment is a small price to pay to rebuild the country’s industrial base and regain control over strategic supply chains.

Reclaiming Economic Sovereignty

Without the IEEPA tariffs which were ruled illegal by the U.S. Court of International Trade in May 2025 and are now at risk of permanent injunction the tariff package would be far less impactful. The effective tariff rate would instead rise to only 4.4%, and revenue raised over the next decade would drop by $1.4 trillion, down to just $532.8 billion.

The strategic value of the IEEPA tariffs cannot be overstated they target fentanyl-related imports, confront China’s aggressive trade behaviour, and send a clear message that the United States will defend itself economically as well as militarily.

In 2025, The Tax Foundation reports that the full tariffs would increase federal tax revenues by $152.7 billion, or 0.49% of GDP making it the largest tax increase since 1993, and significantly larger than any tax hike enacted during the Obama administration.

By contrast, without the IEEPA tariffs, the revenue increase falls to just $36.4 billion, placing it outside the top 20 tax increases in modern U.S. history. These are not abstract numbers they represent the difference between bold economic leadership and business-as-usual passivity.

 

Tariffs as Tools of Global Strategy

Tariffs are not just economic tools; they are strategic levers of geopolitical influence. In response to U.S. actions, China, the EU, and Canada have imposed retaliatory tariffs on $330 billion in American exports.

The Tax Foundation estimates this could reduce U.S. GDP by 0.2% and cut revenue by $132 billion. Yet, these costs highlight the power of tariffs to pressure adversaries and rebalance trade.

President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs 125% on Chinese goods and 50% on EU imports aim to counter nations that exploit open U.S. markets while protecting their own.

As of mid-May 2025, the average U.S. tariff on Chinese imports reached 51.1%, covering nearly all goods levels rivalling the 2018–2020 trade war.

Additionally, EU exports now face a 20% duty, up from 10% earlier in April, as part of a broader effort to restore trade fairness.

For decades, U.S. producers have faced steeper barriers abroad than foreign competitors have faced here. These new tariffs correct that imbalance, incentivize domestic production, and reduce dependence on nations that do not share America’s interests or values.

Industrial Revival and Household Investment

The economic impact of tariffs on American households is real but manageable. In 2025, the average household is expected to face a tax increase of $1,155, rising to $1,397 in 2026.

However, if the IEEPA-based tariffs are blocked, these figures drop sharply to just $275 in 2025 and $358 in 2026.

While these costs are not insignificant, they are modest compared to the long-term benefits: revitalized domestic manufacturing, enhanced national security, and the return of good-paying jobs to communities that have long been overlooked.

Importantly, these household estimates do not capture the broader economic gains such as stronger supply chain resilience, increased consumer choice over time, and reduced vulnerability to global disruptions like pandemics or geopolitical conflicts.

As the Tax Foundation points out, the current projections understate the full cost of inaction, as they omit the hidden toll of lost consumer options and price instability caused by foreign supply shocks.

Maintaining America’s Role as the World’s Leading Power

Perhaps most critically, these tariffs are a reaffirmation of American leadership. For decades, the U.S. has financed the rise of rivals by importing their subsidized goods while hollowing out its own economy.

China’s weaponization of trade, control over rare earth minerals, and role in the fentanyl epidemic show that economic engagement alone will not induce reform. Tariffs, when used strategically, impose consequences and create leverage that soft diplomacy cannot.

America cannot remain the unipolar leader of the global order while depending on adversaries for its industrial backbone.

A country that cannot manufacture its own steel, semiconductors, or medical supplies cannot lead in war or peace. The 2025 tariffs represent a decisive step toward reversing that dependency.

Choosing Strength Over Complacency

The Tax Foundation’s comprehensive report underscores a pivotal truth: the tariffs enacted under President Trump particularly those leveraging the IEEPA mark the most significant transformation in U.S. trade policy in a generation.

These measures are not rooted in outdated protectionism; they are a strategic defence of American workers, industries, and national sovereignty.

Yes, legal battles, political opposition, and economic adjustments are inevitable. But the alternative is far more costly: continued industrial decline, strategic dependence, and diminished global influence.

Now is the moment to reaffirm American strength. These tariffs are not an end; they are a beginning. A down payment on a future where the United States reclaims control over its economic destiny. If America is to lead in the 21st century, it must first secure the foundations of its independence and resilience. 

Kuala Lumpur.

03.06.2025

© Copyright is reserved.

https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/745178

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Two Tales, Two Leaders - PART 1

Man has dual nature; he is both his own person and a member of his country. On the one hand, the law must protect the individual from the injustices of the multitude.  History has shown how individuals fall prey to mass perversity, their crime being simply a refusal to conform to the beliefs and prejudices of the majority. Anwar Ibrahim, The Asian Renaissance, 1997., Page 63. The value system and ethical code therefore determine the success or failure of corrective measures. If the value system is wrong, corrective measures will not be productive or will be only slightly productive. When the value system motivates, very little corrective measures are needed. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, The Malay Dilemma, 1970., Pages 172-173. Introduction Malaysia is our motherland. We love our country. This country has so much of wealth. Even though, Malaysia has agonized considerably in past three decades because of the malpractices of the corrupted characters but she is never fail t...