Skip to main content

Strategic Tariffs, Stronger America

As the world enters a new era of economic competition and geopolitical uncertainty, the United States faces a critical question: will it continue to rely on fragile international supply chains and outdated trade assumptions, or will it seize this moment to rebuild domestic strength?

President Trump’s sweeping 2025 tariff agenda answers that question emphatically and despite controversy, it’s the right move for America’s economic future and global leadership.

The latest analysis from The Tax Foundation’s 2025 Trade Policy Impact Report, one of the most respected nonpartisan sources on tax and trade policy, outlines the far-reaching effects of these tariffs.

The findings show that while there are short-term costs, the strategic benefits far outweigh them especially if the tariffs are implemented fully and allowed to reshape the foundations of U.S. economic policy.

A Transformational Tariff Strategy

President Trump’s proposed tariffs include those under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), targeting countries tied to fentanyl trafficking such as China, as well as broad national security tariffs on steel, aluminium, and auto imports from virtually all trading partners.

If enacted in full, these tariffs would raise the average effective tariff rate to 12.1% the highest since 1941 and bring in nearly $2.0 trillion in federal revenue over the next decade on a conventional basis, or $1.3 trillion dynamically after accounting for behavioural responses, according to The Tax Foundation.

Critics argue that these tariffs would reduce U.S. GDP by 0.8%, but this figure lacks historical context. The same critics failed to object when decades of offshoring and unfair trade led to the closure of tens of thousands of U.S. factories and the loss of millions of middle-class jobs.

A temporary GDP adjustment is a small price to pay to rebuild the country’s industrial base and regain control over strategic supply chains.

Reclaiming Economic Sovereignty

Without the IEEPA tariffs which were ruled illegal by the U.S. Court of International Trade in May 2025 and are now at risk of permanent injunction the tariff package would be far less impactful. The effective tariff rate would instead rise to only 4.4%, and revenue raised over the next decade would drop by $1.4 trillion, down to just $532.8 billion.

The strategic value of the IEEPA tariffs cannot be overstated they target fentanyl-related imports, confront China’s aggressive trade behaviour, and send a clear message that the United States will defend itself economically as well as militarily.

In 2025, The Tax Foundation reports that the full tariffs would increase federal tax revenues by $152.7 billion, or 0.49% of GDP making it the largest tax increase since 1993, and significantly larger than any tax hike enacted during the Obama administration.

By contrast, without the IEEPA tariffs, the revenue increase falls to just $36.4 billion, placing it outside the top 20 tax increases in modern U.S. history. These are not abstract numbers they represent the difference between bold economic leadership and business-as-usual passivity.

 

Tariffs as Tools of Global Strategy

Tariffs are not just economic tools; they are strategic levers of geopolitical influence. In response to U.S. actions, China, the EU, and Canada have imposed retaliatory tariffs on $330 billion in American exports.

The Tax Foundation estimates this could reduce U.S. GDP by 0.2% and cut revenue by $132 billion. Yet, these costs highlight the power of tariffs to pressure adversaries and rebalance trade.

President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs 125% on Chinese goods and 50% on EU imports aim to counter nations that exploit open U.S. markets while protecting their own.

As of mid-May 2025, the average U.S. tariff on Chinese imports reached 51.1%, covering nearly all goods levels rivalling the 2018–2020 trade war.

Additionally, EU exports now face a 20% duty, up from 10% earlier in April, as part of a broader effort to restore trade fairness.

For decades, U.S. producers have faced steeper barriers abroad than foreign competitors have faced here. These new tariffs correct that imbalance, incentivize domestic production, and reduce dependence on nations that do not share America’s interests or values.

Industrial Revival and Household Investment

The economic impact of tariffs on American households is real but manageable. In 2025, the average household is expected to face a tax increase of $1,155, rising to $1,397 in 2026.

However, if the IEEPA-based tariffs are blocked, these figures drop sharply to just $275 in 2025 and $358 in 2026.

While these costs are not insignificant, they are modest compared to the long-term benefits: revitalized domestic manufacturing, enhanced national security, and the return of good-paying jobs to communities that have long been overlooked.

Importantly, these household estimates do not capture the broader economic gains such as stronger supply chain resilience, increased consumer choice over time, and reduced vulnerability to global disruptions like pandemics or geopolitical conflicts.

As the Tax Foundation points out, the current projections understate the full cost of inaction, as they omit the hidden toll of lost consumer options and price instability caused by foreign supply shocks.

Maintaining America’s Role as the World’s Leading Power

Perhaps most critically, these tariffs are a reaffirmation of American leadership. For decades, the U.S. has financed the rise of rivals by importing their subsidized goods while hollowing out its own economy.

China’s weaponization of trade, control over rare earth minerals, and role in the fentanyl epidemic show that economic engagement alone will not induce reform. Tariffs, when used strategically, impose consequences and create leverage that soft diplomacy cannot.

America cannot remain the unipolar leader of the global order while depending on adversaries for its industrial backbone.

A country that cannot manufacture its own steel, semiconductors, or medical supplies cannot lead in war or peace. The 2025 tariffs represent a decisive step toward reversing that dependency.

Choosing Strength Over Complacency

The Tax Foundation’s comprehensive report underscores a pivotal truth: the tariffs enacted under President Trump particularly those leveraging the IEEPA mark the most significant transformation in U.S. trade policy in a generation.

These measures are not rooted in outdated protectionism; they are a strategic defence of American workers, industries, and national sovereignty.

Yes, legal battles, political opposition, and economic adjustments are inevitable. But the alternative is far more costly: continued industrial decline, strategic dependence, and diminished global influence.

Now is the moment to reaffirm American strength. These tariffs are not an end; they are a beginning. A down payment on a future where the United States reclaims control over its economic destiny. If America is to lead in the 21st century, it must first secure the foundations of its independence and resilience. 

Kuala Lumpur.

03.06.2025

© Copyright is reserved.

https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/745178

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives. The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals. Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors. Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare. The 9/11 attacks The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the m...