Skip to main content

Natural Law and Us


In this blog we observe the basic rights through the Malaysian Constitution. We just wanted Mlaysian know their fundamental rights. It's starts within a person and up to the nation's rights.

About mee goreng issue that Matt as mentioned in his comments, well, the our basic rights. We earn our hard money and if we not getting what we wanted with our own earn money, then it's too bad.

We should know our own basic rights to stand up. Let's we start from mee goreng issue. Doesn't matter. It's our money, remember that.

With the latest development of course we are quite skeptical on rule of law. But this is the process or evolution of law that shows us as Malaysian maturing.

Basically I adore natural law. We are live in this world and it’s a chain reaction. I not surprised if someone not agrees with me.

We as the citizens of Malaysia need to know the system we are in to have a good understanding of ourselves.

As I mentioned earlier in Situation A, if you don’t your basic rights then you will forgo your rights and then everything is off for you.

So, you need know your constitution rights and you must uphold your rights not harm anyone but to protect you.

See you soon again.

paneir

Comments

Anonymous said…
Dear Mr Paneir,

Sometimes the law is very general and need more explanation in detail. For those new people in law is difficult to elaborate.

Can i ask you, did you knows about Act 663. There some question i want to ask.
July 22, 2008 at 6:01 PM
justicia said…
well the question is how well is natural law itself. is natural reflected in our constitution. our constitution is a political compromises unlike the Australian where it was legalistic basis.Fundamentals freedom that given in our constitution is not reflected as natural law but a law made in the need of society or group of society.
am i wrong to say this?
August 2, 2008 at 4:27 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...
Post a Comment
Read more

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.
Post a Comment
Read more