Skip to main content

The New Political Landscape


I am here at Permatang Pauh.


The air is getting hotter here. We just have few hours to determine the new political landscape of our country.As


I observed, the mood of the people already on election day's result.We do not discussed about the result of this historical by-election. But the significant of this by-election's result will change the 'theater of political scenes' of our country in future.


How?


First of all, the power democracy will finally return to people of Malaysia and the rule of law will prevailed. And the separation of powers will finally determine very clearly.


This is my observation and not intended to take any sides. After so long we are looking into the growth of seeds of aspirations laid by our 'Merdeka fathers' disregard with race, religion and colour.


I am looking forward for this merdeka celebrations as our country had progressed further in terms of rule of law.

Merdeka! Merdeka! Merdeka!

Comments

raveendran nair said…
The by-election of the century is just over with the landslide victory for Anwar bin Ibrahim. Anwar secured 31,195 votes with higher majority compared to the 12 GE. He was out of the main stream political circle for past ten years and no one from rulings coalition even from opposition have thought he will return back to the house after a long period. In normal circumstance the precedents was, the moment a politicians is out of the main stream then the chances for he/she to return back almost zero percent except in Anwar Ibrahim case. Out of 110 streams (saluran) Anwar win in 108 and Arif Shah only 2 plus postal votes. My analysis will concentrate on the reason on why Arif Shah lost, even at his own ground. READ MORE IN MY BLOG....
August 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...
Post a Comment
Read more

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.
Post a Comment
Read more