Skip to main content

Are we ready for the change?

By next Monday, we as Malaysians will know the outcome of PRU (General Election) 13.

There are many predication. One from mainstream medias are predicated that BN is going to win. The other from alternative medias which are in favour of opposition.

Last few days, I was in various places, from Bandar Tun Razak, Semenyih, Segambut, Lembah Pantai, Subang, Puchong to Klang, the obvious or notable evidence was the mood of the people for the change.

Most of them who I had chatted with only had one/single issue in their conversations that they wanted the change. They said it's quite long for one party ruled our nation and they are bored with the way they are been governed. They felt that  their unhappiness and suffering did not reach the people who walk on the corridors of power. Further they said nothing solid and concrete had been done since 2008 of their grievousness and they felt they just had been ignored.

I think this is the general feelings of the people throughout our nation.

Then, are we really ready for the change?

Before and after the 2008 election this is the question has been asked to the people who had been given a chance to rule us. We have seen the result.

Generally, the people are ready for the change. The fear of instabilities, riots and other unwanted issues actually did not bothered them at all.

The insights are they united as Malaysians. What ever the outcome of election will not influence the Police or RMAF to act otherwise. As what indicated by IGP and Director of CID recently the national security is paramount and PDRM is holding out the duty to maintain peace and security of our country.

Therefore the fear which has been used always as a tool to gain support and suppress no longer relevant for present day. 

The change is inevitable.

Kuala Lumpur.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.