Skip to main content

Look at anti-terror laws Down Under

THE suggestion made by Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi to create new preventive laws to tackle terror threats is highly appreciated.

The government can look at security legislation in Australia to draft new security laws. Australia has long played a pivotal role by creating legislation on counter-terrorism, national security and other cross-jurisdictional offences.

The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 sets out the functions of the Australia Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), Australia's security service. This law empowers ASIO to obtain warrants for surveillance and to detain and question a person who may have information important to the gathering of intelligence in relation to a terrorist activity.

The Crimes Act 1914 deals with crime, the powers of the authorities to investigate it and related issues including sabotage, treachery, disclosure of information and other issues.

The Crimes (Foreign Incursions and Recruitment) Act 1978 covers offences prohibiting Australian citizens and residents from engaging in hostile activities in a foreign state and recruiting people to do so.

The Criminal Code Act 1995 covers terrorism and terrorism related acts.

The Surveillance Devices Act 2004 sets out procedures for officers to obtain warrants, emergency authorisations and tracking device authorisations for the installation and use of surveillance devices in criminal investigations and other initiatives.

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 permits ASIO to intercept telecommunications under warrant for intelligence gathering including in relation to threats of terrorism.

It also provides authority, where a warrant is obtained for Australian law enforcement bodies to intercept telecommunications in investigations into serious offences, including a range of terrorism offences.

It is expected there will be some conflict between security laws and human rights. The laws because of their very nature restrict freedom, rights and in some cases, liberty. For national security purposes, we sometimes have to sacrifice some liberties to protect the sovereignty of our nation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...
Post a Comment
Read more

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.
Post a Comment
Read more