Skip to main content

Look at anti-terror laws Down Under

THE suggestion made by Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi to create new preventive laws to tackle terror threats is highly appreciated.

The government can look at security legislation in Australia to draft new security laws. Australia has long played a pivotal role by creating legislation on counter-terrorism, national security and other cross-jurisdictional offences.

The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 sets out the functions of the Australia Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), Australia's security service. This law empowers ASIO to obtain warrants for surveillance and to detain and question a person who may have information important to the gathering of intelligence in relation to a terrorist activity.

The Crimes Act 1914 deals with crime, the powers of the authorities to investigate it and related issues including sabotage, treachery, disclosure of information and other issues.

The Crimes (Foreign Incursions and Recruitment) Act 1978 covers offences prohibiting Australian citizens and residents from engaging in hostile activities in a foreign state and recruiting people to do so.

The Criminal Code Act 1995 covers terrorism and terrorism related acts.

The Surveillance Devices Act 2004 sets out procedures for officers to obtain warrants, emergency authorisations and tracking device authorisations for the installation and use of surveillance devices in criminal investigations and other initiatives.

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 permits ASIO to intercept telecommunications under warrant for intelligence gathering including in relation to threats of terrorism.

It also provides authority, where a warrant is obtained for Australian law enforcement bodies to intercept telecommunications in investigations into serious offences, including a range of terrorism offences.

It is expected there will be some conflict between security laws and human rights. The laws because of their very nature restrict freedom, rights and in some cases, liberty. For national security purposes, we sometimes have to sacrifice some liberties to protect the sovereignty of our nation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.
Post a Comment
Read more

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...
Post a Comment
Read more

Two Tales, Two Leaders - PART 1

Man has dual nature; he is both his own person and a member of his country. On the one hand, the law must protect the individual from the injustices of the multitude.  History has shown how individuals fall prey to mass perversity, their crime being simply a refusal to conform to the beliefs and prejudices of the majority. Anwar Ibrahim, The Asian Renaissance, 1997., Page 63. The value system and ethical code therefore determine the success or failure of corrective measures. If the value system is wrong, corrective measures will not be productive or will be only slightly productive. When the value system motivates, very little corrective measures are needed. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, The Malay Dilemma, 1970., Pages 172-173. Introduction Malaysia is our motherland. We love our country. This country has so much of wealth. Even though, Malaysia has agonized considerably in past three decades because of the malpractices of the corrupted characters but she is never fail t...
Post a Comment
Read more