Skip to main content

As America pulls out of Yemen, ISIS and AQAP move in

By Alexis Knutsen

The United States began withdrawing its remaining personnel from Yemen Saturday, citing deteriorating security conditions. About 100 American troops, including the special operations forces assisting the Yemeni military in the fight against al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), were evacuated. The move diminishes America’s intelligence footprint in Yemen and abandons the country to AQAP, the Iranian-backed al Houthis, and, now, the Islamic State in Iraq and al Sham (ISIS). What does the Obama administration intend to do about the threat from Yemen? So far, not much.

Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen, AQAP, is nowhere close to being defeated, and is, in fact, benefiting from Yemen’s chaos. Yemen has slowly collapsed into two rival governments – one in northern Yemen controlled by the Zaydi Shia rebel group known as the al Houthis, and the other in southern Yemen under former President Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi, whom the US still recognizes as Yemen’s president. As both the Hadi and al Houthi governments are drawn further into armed conflict, both sides will likely be less able to commit forces to fighting AQAP.  AQAP, furthermore, has also been able to embed its fighters within local populations opposed to the al Houthis, giving AQAP more operating room throughout the country.

ISIS is also opening a new Yemen front and is trying to stoke sectarian conflict. On March 20, ISIS supporters bombed two mosques in Sana’a frequented by al Houthis and attempted to bomb a mosque in the al Houthi stronghold of Sa’ada in north Yemen. The attack killed upwards of 140 and has already elicited a strong reaction from the al Houthis, who were the primary target. ISIS used a similar strategy of targeting Shia in 2006 to bring Iraq to full-scale sectarian conflict. While sectarianism is not traditionally strong in Yemen, Yemen is not immune to it either. Even a few attacks like this can fuel a sectarian conflict, potentially benefiting both ISIS and even AQAP.

So what’s the US to do? The withdrawal of our counter-terrorism forces severely limits what were already limited options. To start, the US and its Gulf partners should continue to make any efforts they can to get Hadi and the al Houthis to a negotiating table. We also need to answer what the state of the intelligence on Yemen is now and who we think our counter-terrorism partners should be.

A few things are certain – the Yemen conflict is going to get worse, AQAP and ISIS are going to benefit, and the US is going to be less safe because of it. Doing nothing is not an option.

Source: https://www.aei.org/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two Tales, Two Leaders - PART 1

Man has dual nature; he is both his own person and a member of his country. On the one hand, the law must protect the individual from the injustices of the multitude.  History has shown how individuals fall prey to mass perversity, their crime being simply a refusal to conform to the beliefs and prejudices of the majority. Anwar Ibrahim, The Asian Renaissance, 1997., Page 63. The value system and ethical code therefore determine the success or failure of corrective measures. If the value system is wrong, corrective measures will not be productive or will be only slightly productive. When the value system motivates, very little corrective measures are needed. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, The Malay Dilemma, 1970., Pages 172-173. Introduction Malaysia is our motherland. We love our country. This country has so much of wealth. Even though, Malaysia has agonized considerably in past three decades because of the malpractices of the corrupted characters but she is never fail t...

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.