Skip to main content

Expert: Send terrorists to uninhabited island

By Nawar Firdaws

PETALING JAYA: A terrorism expert has proposed the isolation of known terrorists and their sympathisers on an uninhabited island until they are rehabilitated.
This would prevent prevent them from influencing other inmates in regular prisons with their ideologies, said R Paneir Selvam in an interview with FMT.
“Allowing them interaction with other inmates is very dangerous,” he said. “They may inspire others to commit terror acts as well.”
Paneir, who is the Chairman of the Association of Legal and Policy Researchers, noted that Malaysia had a system of isolation of criminals in the 1960s and 1970s, when Pulau Jerejak served as a penal colony. Hardcore criminals were sent there for rehabilitation before they were transferred.
“Bukit Aman’s counter-terrorism branch has been arresting more and more Malaysian IS members and sympathisers, and the number is growing,” he said.
“Rather than placing them in a normal prison where they are allowed to mix around with young, impressionable inmates, they should be isolated and rehabilitated.”
He said the detention of IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi at Iraq’s Camp Bukka showed that conventional imprisonment might not work with terrorists.
“From there, he influenced those within the camp to collaborate with him and form a group dedicated to terrorism,” he said.
“In Malaysia, we have Yazid Sufaat, a former member of Jemaah Islamiyah who was imprisoned in 2001. Then the government said he was reformed and released him.”
Yazid was again arrested in 2014 and sentenced to seven years’ in jail after pleading guilty to an alternative charge of omitting to give information relating to terrorist acts. He was originally charged with promoting the commission of terrorist acts and being a member of the terrorist group Tanzim al-Qaeda Malaysia.
Paneir’s call followed a statement by Justin Siberell, the Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism at the US State Department, in which he said the IS was considering expansion into Southeast Asia by joining forces with local extremists.
“We’re certainly concerned about IS’ ability to expand or to establish branches,” a news report quoted Siberell as saying.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives. The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals. Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors. Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare. The 9/11 attacks The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the m...