Skip to main content

GE14 - The mother of all elections in Malaysia

The GE14 will be conducted very soon in Malaysia. 

This election is very different from other elections which was held in Malaysia previously. This election is no longer a battle between Malays and non-Malays but instead between Malays themselves.

They are at the crossroads to decide to whom their support is.

The margin of advantage between the ruling party and opposition party is very thin. There are many Malays who disassociate themselves with both party. They are undecided. They are confused.

Firstly, they don't understand why a leader they had revered the most has joined and collaborating with opposition.

Secondly, why there are many parties claiming they are representing Malays and why are so many now?

Thirdly, where they are belong too i.e. to which party they are associate with.

Lastly, who will preserve and protect their rights and priviliges better.

In this election, the deciding factor for the outcome of this election is with Malays.

Therefore this election is the mother of all elections and so crucial for the future of Malaysia.

As what I observed in the electronic media including social media, the undercurrent sentiments is slightly in favour of opposition because of Dr Mahathir's factor. He has seen as a true national leader who has contributed enormously for the development of  this nation.

He is not only the leader for Malays but for other races as well in this country.

He was a former Prime Minister who has a lot of experience handling elections for his former party and that will be a key factor in deciding the outcome of this election.

Let's wait and see.

Kuala Lumpur


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...
Post a Comment
Read more

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.
Post a Comment
Read more