Skip to main content

“Extreme measures needed to tackle terrorists and their sympathisers”

 TERRORIST acts in the UK, France and Belgium have demonstrated that traditional approaches for rehabilitating and de-radicalising terrorists, militants, and extremists are no longer effective. Usman Khan and Sudesh Amman, for example, totally subscribe to the erroneous ideology and, in reality, had refused to reform.

These hard-core, extremist individuals, in my opinion, are immune to rehabilitation and reform. There are no comprehensive rehabilitation programmes available to completely transform such people. This harsh reality must be accepted by security and intelligence services.

As a result, there is no definitive anti-terrorist solution. Terrorists are evolving and finding new means to conduct acts of violence, therefore intelligence and security personnel must be vigilant and proactive in their response.

One extreme approach is to establish a designated gathering location for hardcore followers, sympathisers and terrorists where they can be completely watched. They must also be secluded from general society, with family members having limited access or interaction. They must also be examined by third-party experts. Authorities should not consider releasing these individuals into society unless significant progress has been made with them. This may appear to be cruel and in violation of a person’s fundamental rights, but the peace and security of a nation should take precedence.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is another counter-terrorism strategy that can be useful.  Terrorists are adept at using the internet, particularly social media, to broadcast propaganda for recruiting and financing. As a result, intelligence services can create and employ AI to detect, monitor and fight such actions. AI can also be used to track down members of sleeper cells who may pose a concern in the future.

Security and intelligence organisations must exercise continuous monitoring to thwart terrorist groups and individuals. This will limit their mobility and may deter them from wrecking important infrastructure facilities in the country if more effective border security measures are in place, backed by well-trained officials along susceptible borders such as Perlis to Kelantan and Sabah. Frontline police at ports of entry play a critical role in identifying and preventing terrorists from entering the country easily.

Bioterrorism concerns 

Terrorists must also be prevented from obtaining materials such as biological weapons such as viruses, bacteria, fungi, or other poisons that are potentially hazardous and can be utilised in an assault. The COVId-19 pandemic, for example, can be viewed as a potentially devastating consequence that may incite terrorist groups to adopt bio-terrorism as an alternative to traditional methods of attack in the future.

In a nutshell, terrorism is not a religious issue. Recruiters have frequently brainwashed terrorists in the name of religion and philosophy. As a result, rather than focusing on a tiny number of people who are misled by incorrect ideas and distortion of religious texts, I am pushing the relevant agencies to enhance their efforts to defend the people and nation as a whole.

The UK is becoming a hotbed for terrorists to launch strikes within its borders, with the increased involvement of new converts and asylum seekers providing additional proof that assaults are impending.

This is a continuous process, and these agencies, whether in Malaysia or elsewhere, cannot be overconfident in the current success record in preventing terrorist strikes. They must constantly seek new ways and methods, including the use of evolving technology, such as AI, to better identify not only terrorists, but also their sympathisers and supporters, while also strengthening existing terrorism legislation to prevent future terrorist attacks. 

And the rise of Taliban and ISIS-K has increased the impetus for other terrorist organisations around the world to restructure their operations in order to launch terrorist strikes, as proven recently. – Nov 21, 2021. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Trump's role in the Israel-Hamas ceasefire

As the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, scheduled to commence on Jan 19, 2025, approaches, it is essential to examine the potential impact of president-elect Donald Trump on this event and Middle East security. Considering Trump’s past foreign policy actions, especially those concerning Israel, alongside the wider geopolitical environment, his prospective role in shaping the ceasefire and future peace initiatives is intricate and layered. Historical influence Trump’s initial term as president was characterised by a robust endorsement of Israel, a position that resonated with his domestic political supporters and simultaneously altered US foreign policy, thereby impacting the wider dynamics of the Middle East. Key actions during this period included the formal acknowledgement of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the transfer of the US embassy to that city, and the withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement. These measures solidified his rapport with Israeli leadership and exemplified his ...