Skip to main content

The by-election in Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) and the Indian electorate

 I was born in Malaysia, belonging to the Indian ethnic group, which constitutes approximately 7% of the country's total population.

My durable credence is that I am Malaysian first and foremost, and only then do I identify myself as Indian.

Regrettably, it saddens me to witness and hear about the actions of certain politicians who question my loyalty to Malaysia.

What is even more disheartening is that some Malaysians have been influenced by the manipulative rhetoric of these self-serving politicians.

Recently, I have observed numerous discussions on both mainstream and online news platforms regarding the recognition and inclusion of Indians by ruling parties.

Surprisingly, even the opposition has displayed a significant interest in the welfare of Indians.

Upon contemplating the reasons behind this sudden surge in attention towards Indians, it becomes evident that it is primarily driven by the upcoming Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) by-election.

It is noteworthy that such trends tend to emerge exclusively during by-elections or general elections.

Kuala Kubu Baharu by-election

The upcoming by-election in Kuala Kubu Baharu has highlighted the significant role of the Indian electorate, who make up nearly 18% of the total voters.

Historically, this constituency was considered a stronghold for the Barisan Nasional (BN) component party, MCA, until 2013 when it became a throttlehold for DAP, which is now part of the Pakatan Harapan (PH) coalition.

The Malay voters make up approximately 47% of the electorate, while the Chinese voters account for 30%.

This demographic composition indicates that the Indian voters have the potential to be the deciding factor in determining the winner of this by-election.

Consequently, both the ruling party and the opposition have started showing interest in Indian issues, not necessarily because they genuinely care, but rather to secure the maximum number of Indian votes and win this crucial election.

The behavior of politicians from various parties, including Indian politicians who only speak up on Indian matters during 'special' occasions like this, leads me to question if Indians, or more specifically Indian voters, are being used as mere tools for the self-serving agendas of these politicians.

I am slowly losing faith in these politicians who consistently make grand promises but ultimately have no desire to meet the fundamental needs of the Indian community in Malaysia.

They are skilled performers whose main concern is safeguarding their own political future in this nation.

These politicians lack the insight to comprehend the expectations of young voters, including Indian voters, who are tired of the theatrical and unproductive tactics employed by these individuals.

This nation was once blessed with exceptional leaders such as Tun Dr Ismail, Tok Guru Nik Aziz, and Tun Ghazali Shafie, who prioritized the welfare of the people above all else, regardless of race or religion.

Regrettably, leaders of such caliber are now scarce or non-existent in this country.

There is significant discontent among the Indian community, particularly the Tamils, due to the absence of a Tamil Minister in the cabinet for the first time since independence.

 The Tamils constitute the majority of the Indian population in the country. I am skeptical whether a non-Tamil Minister truly comprehends the genuine requirements of the Tamil community in this nation.

Despite having three deputy ministers who are able to communicate in Tamil, their absence from the cabinet meetings where policy decisions are made is concerning.

This singular matter holds significant importance as Indian voters in KKB weigh their options between supporting the opposition or independent candidates.

Historically, Indian voters have been staunch supporters of BN until they recognized that their loyalty was being taken advantage of.

Following the emergence of HINDRAF in 2007, there was a shift towards voting for Pakatan Rakyat, which later evolved into PH.

However, since 2022, after PH formed a coalition government with BN, GPS, and GRS, the Indian community on the ground has felt neglected and marginalized, with their concerns not being adequately addressed by the current administration.

The recent state election, particularly in Selangor, where Perikatan Nasional (PN) has secured additional seats, suggests a gradual shift of Indian voters away from PH.

It has been observed that prominent Indian leaders within PH, particularly in PKR and DAP, were sidelined in the previous general election and the recent state election.

The Indian community perceives the current composition of Indian leaders in PKR and DAP as lacking influence and being subservient to the top leadership of these parties.

The upcoming by-election serves as a crucial test for the Indian community to determine which leader and political party they truly trust.

The continuous mistakes made by the ruling party, along with superficial attempts to rectify them, will not be accepted by the Indian community.

The present Indian population is well-informed about current national and international affairs thanks to social media.

They are capable of distinguishing trustworthy leaders who can address their basic needs in the country.

Young Indian voters have become more astute and can influence their older counterparts to support a specific leader or party.

It is essential to remind national leaders, regardless of their affiliation, not to underestimate the voting power of the Indian community in the country. The days of taking advantage of them are long gone.

In summary, during this era of Artificial Intelligence, simply using rhetoric and performing for voters, particularly Indian voters, will not be sufficient to secure their votes.

 The vast amount of information shared on social media, as well as the influence of their children, will play a crucial role in deciding whom they will choose to support.

Blindly supporting a specific leader, political party, or coalition is no longer the primary factor for Indian voters in this nation.

Kuala Lumpur
06.05.2024

All Copyright is reserved. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sedition Act 1948 should have been repealed a long time ago. But why?

THE Sedition Act 1948 is a legislative measure that was enacted in Malaysia during the colonial era, designed to curb any form of speech or expression that was deemed to be seditious in nature with the aim of maintaining public order and security. The Sedition Act has been subject to much debate and criticism, with some arguing that it is a violation of freedom of speech and expression. Despite this, the Act remains in force in Malaysia to this day, albeit with some amendments made over the years. Although I concur with the abolition of this Act, it is imperative that a comparable new legislation be enacted to address the escalating prevalence of racially and religiously bigoted remarks that have been unsettling our distinctive multicultural and multi-religious society as of late. An instance that exemplifies the prudent decision-making of the governing body is the substitution of the Internal Security Act of 1960 with the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA). This rep

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i

Terrorism in Africa

According to state.gov, ISIS was defeated a few years ago. However, the organization's presence and existence remain conspicuous in Africa. Ongoing conflicts in Somalia, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso demonstrate that ISIS has shifted its focus away from Iraq and Syria. Although ISIS lacks a clear hierarchy like Al-Qaeda, its followers and supporters wholeheartedly believe in its strong ideology. In 2014, the United States led the formation of a broad international coalition known as 'The Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS' to combat the organization during the height of the Syrian and Iraqi conflict. The primary objectives of this 83-member coalition are to degrade and defeat ISIS, which poses a threat to international peace and security. ISIS has brought thousands of foreign fighters from around the world to combat zones like Syria and Iraq, and it has used technology to promote its violent extremist ideology and instigate terrorist attacks. For example, t