Skip to main content

Orebro shooting reflects far-right extremism, impacting global and Malaysian security

The recent incident at Risbergska school in Orebro, Sweden, which resulted in the deaths of ten individuals, including members of the Syrian and Bosnian communities, represents a deeply tragic occurrence that has profoundly impacted the nation.

Although investigations are still in progress and the authorities have not yet established a definitive motive, preliminary evidence suggests that the shooting may be connected to far-right extremist or xenophobic ideologies.

This incident shares alarming parallels with other acts of terrorism motivated by far-right beliefs, such as the attacks in Norway and New Zealand, where white supremacist ideologies incited lethal violence.

The Orebro Shooting: Investigating the Motive

The circumstances surrounding the Orebro school shooting remain complex and not fully elucidated, with various potential motives currently being examined.

The alleged perpetrator, 35-year-old Rickard Andersson, reportedly took his own life following the incident.

An analysis of his background and behaviour suggests the presence of a personal grievance against local authorities, as well as a possible ideological inclination towards far-right extremism.

It has been noted that Andersson had a confrontation with a social worker regarding the termination of his welfare benefits, and a video captured during the attack featured the phrase "out of Europe!"

This statement, along with the gunman's evident social isolation and the diverse ethnic backgrounds of the victims, implies that his actions may have been driven by xenophobic or anti-immigrant sentiments.

Although law enforcement officials are exercising caution in disclosing information, the notion of a racially motivated assault has been considered, particularly in light of the fact that one of the victims, Salim Iskef, a Syrian Christian, was among those killed, alongside two Bosnian nationals.

These individuals were affiliated with immigrant communities, which positions the attack within a broader context of violence directed at immigrants and minority groups.

The Norway and New Zealand Attacks

The incidents in Norway (2011) and New Zealand (2019) serve as significant indicators of the escalating prevalence of far-right extremism and white supremacist violence on a global scale.

The mass murders perpetrated by Anders Behring Breivik in Norway in 2011, which specifically targeted young leftist activists, were driven by a deeply entrenched ideology characterized by anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-socialist sentiments.

Breivik positioned himself as a defender against what he perceived as an "Islamic invasion" of Europe, articulating his beliefs in a detailed manifesto.

In a parallel manner, the Christchurch Mosque shootings in New Zealand in 2019, executed by Australian national Brenton Tarrant, resulted in the deaths of 51 Muslim worshippers.

Tarrant's motivations were similarly rooted in white supremacist ideology, with Breivik serving as a notable influence on his actions. He articulated a fear of an "immigrant invasion" and framed his assault as part of a larger "war" against multiculturalism.

Despite the geographical separation of these two events, they reflect a troubling pattern of far-right violence that has emerged in reaction to rising global migration, anxieties regarding demographic shifts, and an increase in anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant discourse.

Furthermore, both attacks were disseminated through various media channels in ways that sought to propagate far-right ideologies and incite further acts of violence.

Comparing the Orebro Shooting to Far-Right Terrorism

The ongoing investigation into the Orebro shooting reveals characteristics reminiscent of previous attacks in Norway and New Zealand.

The shooter appears to be motivated by xenophobic and anti-immigrant sentiments, paralleling the ideologies that drove Breivik and Tarrant.

The utterance of "out of Europe!" during the incident suggests an alignment with the white supremacist beliefs that have underpinned other violent acts.

Additionally, the targeting of immigrants, including individuals from Syria and Bosnia, underscores the heightened risks faced by minority groups in Europe from far-right extremists.

While the specifics of whether the attack was premeditated or triggered by a personal dispute remain uncertain, it is crucial to consider the larger ideological backdrop of escalating far-right extremism.

The intensifying polarization in political dialogue and the emergence of populist, nationalist movements globally have fostered an environment conducive to such ideologies, thereby exacerbating the threats to immigrants and minority populations.

Impact on Malaysian National Security

The increase in far-right extremism and white supremacist violence observed in Europe and the Southern Hemisphere is a phenomenon that extends beyond these regions.

Malaysia, characterized by its multicultural demographic comprising ethnic Malays, Chinese, Indians, and immigrants from various Muslim-majority nations, must remain alert to the global threats posed by such ideologies.

Despite Malaysia's distinct socio-political landscape compared to Europe, the worldwide dynamics of radicalization suggest that the nation could still be influenced by the same forces that incite far-right extremism elsewhere.

There are multiple avenues through which Malaysia’s national security may be jeopardized by the global escalation of far-right violence.

For instance, similar to the situation in Orebro, immigrants in Malaysia, particularly those hailing from Muslim-majority countries like Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Myanmar, may find themselves at risk of attacks fuelled by anti-immigrant sentiments.

Although Malaysia is generally known for its tolerance, the rising prevalence of far-right ideologies internationally could potentially incite analogous hate-driven violence within its borders.

 

Moreover, Malaysia might witness the emergence of far-right movements or individuals influenced by white supremacist ideologies, akin to those observed in Europe and New Zealand.

The internet and social media platforms serve as fertile grounds for the dissemination of extremist ideologies.

Malaysian youth, especially those who experience marginalization or disenfranchisement, as well as those who are misled by flawed religious ideologies, may be especially susceptible to these influences.

It is imperative for government agencies and law enforcement to adopt a proactive stance in countering such movements before they gain a foothold.

The transnational character of far-right extremism also implies that attacks motivated by foreign incidents could have repercussions in Malaysia.

Should the extremist rhetoric associated with the attacks in Norway and New Zealand continue to resonate, Malaysia may confront the threat of copycat incidents or individuals who draw inspiration from these violent occurrences.

Malaysia, recognized as a significant entity in Southeast Asia, may encounter heightened regional tensions associated with far-right ideologies.

The proliferation of anti-immigrant sentiments stemming from far-right factions could intensify pre-existing security issues and foster divisions within Malaysian society. National security risks may emerge if these tensions escalate into violence.

Conclusion

The recent incident in Orebro, Sweden, potentially linked to far-right extremism, underscores the worldwide nature of such violence and the escalating threat posed by white supremacist ideologies.

The attacks in Norway and New Zealand serve as poignant reminders of the lethal ramifications of this trend.

For Malaysia, which boasts a diverse demographic and faces its own security dilemmas, the emergence of far-right terrorism represents a significant threat to national security.

The nation must remain alert to the possible proliferation of extremist ideologies and strive to promote social cohesion and inclusivity to protect against the global surge of hatred and violence.

It is imperative to enhance national security measures to counter the increasing sway of these ideologies, both domestically and within the larger global framework.


12.02.2025

© Copyright is reserved.

Source: https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/734272

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

The by-election in Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) and the Indian electorate

  I was born in Malaysia, belonging to the Indian ethnic group, which constitutes approximately 7% of the country's total population. My durable credence is that I am Malaysian first and foremost, and only then do I identify myself as Indian. Regrettably, it saddens me to witness and hear about the actions of certain politicians who question my loyalty to Malaysia. What is even more disheartening is that some Malaysians have been influenced by the manipulative rhetoric of these self-serving politicians. Recently, I have observed numerous discussions on both mainstream and online news platforms regarding the recognition and inclusion of Indians by ruling parties. Surprisingly, even the opposition has displayed a significant interest in the welfare of Indians. Upon contemplating the reasons behind this sudden surge in attention towards Indians, it becomes evident that it is primarily driven by the upcoming Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) by-election. It is noteworthy that such ...

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...