Skip to main content

Malaysia in a Shifting World Order

The global geopolitical landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. For decades, American dominance economically, militarily, and diplomatically that defined the post–Cold War international order. Today, that dominance is increasingly challenged by emerging powers and shifting global alignments.

The rise of competing powers, growing distrust of U.S. intentions, and the resurgence of nationalist economic policies, particularly under Donald Trump’s second term, are accelerating the fragmentation of global power.

In place of a U.S.-led unipolar order, a multipolar world is emerging one increasingly defined by the rivalry between the United States, an emerging axis of Russia–China–India (RCI), and a recalibrated European Union.

Trump’s recent moves to impose tariffs on a wide swath of countries, including traditional allies like the European Union, Canada, South Korea, and India, mark a decisive turn away from multilateralism. The U.S. under Trump appears less interested in preserving alliances than in asserting economic leverage to secure short-term national interests.

India, for instance, faces U.S. tariffs due to its continued oil trade with Russia, while European states face penalties despite shared democratic values. These actions have weakened global trust in American leadership and encouraged other powers to seek alternatives to the U.S.-centric system.

The result is a slow but steady alignment of interests among Russia, China, and India. While not formal allies, these countries are cooperating more closely in trade, defence, and energy. Russia remains a key energy supplier and geopolitical counterweight to the West.

China, with its vast economic influence and Belt and Road Initiative, offers an alternative vision of globalization. India, although traditionally aligned with the West, is asserting a more independent foreign policy, strengthening its role in the Global South, and resisting U.S. pressure on Russia-related issues.

Together, these powers are exploring financial systems outside of SWIFT, expanding BRICS collaboration, and discussing alternative trade currencies, actions that directly challenge U.S. economic hegemony.

Meanwhile, the European Union, once America’s closest ally, is rethinking its dependency. Trump’s economic aggression and his transactional approach to diplomacy have led EU leaders to prioritize strategic autonomy.

The EU’s efforts to develop independent digital, defence, and energy strategies alongside deeper engagement with Asia, Africa, and Latin America that signal a broader desire to avoid entanglement in U.S.-China rivalry. The EU may not align with the RCI bloc, but it is increasingly pursuing a third path, forming a new pole in the global order.

For Malaysia, this changing world order brings both uncertainty and opportunity. As a middle power deeply embedded in global trade networks, Malaysia cannot afford to take sides in great power competition.

At the same time, it must not be passive. Malaysia’s long-standing commitment to neutrality, rooted in its non-aligned foreign policy tradition, must evolve into an active strategy of diversification, engagement, and resilience.

First, Malaysia must reaffirm and modernize its policy of strategic neutrality. This means rejecting rigid alignment while maintaining open channels with all major powers. Malaysia’s position within ASEAN provides a crucial platform to strengthen regional voice and unity. By championing ASEAN centrality, Malaysia can help prevent Southeast Asia from becoming a theatre for proxy competition and preserve the region’s collective autonomy.

Second, Malaysia needs to invest in economic resilience. This includes diversifying its trade partnerships, moving up the value chain, and integrating further into regional economic frameworks like the ASEAN Free Trade Area and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Strengthening ties with non-traditional partners including the EU, Middle East, and Africa will reduce exposure to U.S.–China volatility.

Third, Malaysia should enhance its regional security role. Without entering into formal alliances, Malaysia can support multilateral defence dialogues, invest in maritime domain awareness, and participate in joint capacity-building exercises. The South China Sea remains a sensitive flashpoint, and Malaysia must defend its sovereignty while advocating for peaceful, rules-based resolution mechanisms such as UNCLOS.

Fourth, Malaysia must remain a vocal proponent of multilateralism and international law. As powerful states bend or break norms to serve national interests, smaller nations like Malaysia have every reason to insist on the sanctity of global institutions. Supporting the United Nations, World Trade Organization, and regional conflict-resolution bodies will be critical in upholding a predictable international environment.

Finally, Malaysia should embrace its role as a bridge builder. As a Muslim-majority democracy with deep ties to both East and West, Malaysia is uniquely positioned to mediate, convene, and foster dialogue. It has a track record of hosting peace talks, and its balanced relationships allow it to engage credibly across ideological divides. This middle-power diplomacy can be a powerful asset in a divided world.

The rivalry between the United States and the RCI axis, along with the EU’s pursuit of strategic independence, marks the dawn of a new global configuration. Power is no longer concentrated in one capital or alliance but spread across regions, ideologies, and networks.

This is not necessarily a more dangerous world but it is a more complex one. For Malaysia, the path forward lies not in choosing sides, but in choosing principles: sovereignty, regional cooperation, economic inclusivity, and peaceful engagement.

In a time of shifting alliances and contested norms, Malaysia must act with foresight, agility, and unity. Its strength will lie not in military might or economic scale, but in its ability to stay true to its values while adapting to the winds of change.

The world may be entering a new order, but with the right strategy, Malaysia can help shape it rather than be shaped by it.

02.08.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© Copyrights reserved.

https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/751000

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.