Skip to main content

Malaysia: Human Rights Under Threat- the Internal Security Act (ISA) and other restrictive laws

Background
Since the 1970s Amnesty International has raised serious concerns that fundamental human rights enshrined in the Malaysian Constitution and international human rights law are threatened by the Internal Security Act (ISA), which allows indefinite 'preventive' detention without trial, and by a broad array of other laws restricting rights to freedom of expression, assembly and association.
Many of these laws were inherited from the British former colonial government and subsequently tightened incrementally. Their application has been both politically-motivated and selective, with those targeted including political or social activists, academics, students, journalists, trade unionists and other peaceful members of civil society perceived by the government as threats.
Students and academics under threat
Malaysian students and academics wishing to engage in political activities face severe restrictions under the Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA). According to the act, students may be imprisoned for six months and fined if they are active in any political party, society, or trade union without their university's permission.
Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has rejected calls for a review of the Act, accusing the opposition of subverting students against the government and warning students they faced expulsion or the denial of financial assistance if they took part in 'anti-government activities'. Although no prosecutions leading to imprisonment under the UUCA have been reported in recent years, university authorities continue to threaten use of the Act and have initiated disciplinary proceedings against students, leading to suspension or expulsion from their course. Academics are also risk at dismissal for involvement in peaceful political activity.
In October 2001 the Education Minister announced that 61 university lecturers had been dismissed, transferred or issued with warnings for alleged 'anti-government' activities. Students and teachers have also been penalized under the Police Act for participating in demonstrations calling for political reform.
In June 2001 following the arrest of seven students for participating in a peaceful demonstration a number of students were expelled or suspended from their universities. In addition, in July two student activists supportive of reformasi were arrested under the ISA and accused of 'threatening national security'.
After being held incommunicado for 10 and 23 days respectively the students were released.In August 2001 a high-school teacher was charged with sedition for setting a examination question addressing the effectiveness of the Malaysian judiciary.
Amnesty International calls on the Government of Malaysia to respect and uphold fundamental human rights enshrined in the Malaysian Constitution, the Commonwealth Harare Principles and international human rights law. The organization:
  • calls for those detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) be released immediately or otherwise charged with a recognizably criminal offence. Persons who are suspected of threatening national security should have the opportunity to defend themselves before a court of law in proceedings that meet international standards for fair trial;
  • urges the Malaysian authorities to guarantee that any detainee held under the ISA or other legislation is not subjected to physical or psychological torture or other ill-treatment in detention. All complaints of torture or ill-treatment must be promptly and impartially investigated and those found responsible brought to justice;
  • calls for detainees not to be held incommunicado and to be allowed immediate and regular access to lawyers, their families and independent medical attention;
  • urging that the ISA and other restrictive legislation be repealed or amended so that it no longer allows for the detention of those exercising their right to peaceful freedom of expression, association or assembly.

Source:

http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA28/031/2001/en/dom-ASA280312001en.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two Tales, Two Leaders - PART 1

Man has dual nature; he is both his own person and a member of his country. On the one hand, the law must protect the individual from the injustices of the multitude.  History has shown how individuals fall prey to mass perversity, their crime being simply a refusal to conform to the beliefs and prejudices of the majority. Anwar Ibrahim, The Asian Renaissance, 1997., Page 63. The value system and ethical code therefore determine the success or failure of corrective measures. If the value system is wrong, corrective measures will not be productive or will be only slightly productive. When the value system motivates, very little corrective measures are needed. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, The Malay Dilemma, 1970., Pages 172-173. Introduction Malaysia is our motherland. We love our country. This country has so much of wealth. Even though, Malaysia has agonized considerably in past three decades because of the malpractices of the corrupted characters but she is never fail t...

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

An Open Letter to Ayahanda Tun - PART 3

For me, to say I want to go to sleep and retire and prepare for my afterlife, I think that is very selfish. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, The Straits Times – 22 January 2017. This statement is the reflection of ayahanda Tun’s true character. For many of us, he is father of this nation. His love for this nation is unprecedented. Even though he was retired in 2003 but made a comeback in 2018 as the seventh Prime Minster of Malaysia at the age of 93 years. He made a history. At this twilight age, most people would have a ‘quite’ life but not ayahanda.   The biggest question is why ayahanda had to return to active in politics at this age to ‘save’ Malaysia. What are the factors which have triggered him to take such a drastic decision? At that time, Malaysia’s reputation was at the stake because of the kleptocratic regime. In addition, the economic, social and political factors had triggered him to make a comeback. But, the main focal point of his return is the damaged r...