Skip to main content

Shootings, Murders and Human Rights [Updated on 13/8/13]



Past 30 days more than 18 shootings and 8 murders taken place in Malaysia. From the mainstream media and internet portals this becomes the hottest topic which had been discussed by various parties. The most obvious scapegoat on this matter is the Royal Police of Malaysia.

Our new Inspector General of Police comes under scrutiny from numerous sectors of people within our society. We cannot blame him solely of what is happening in our country now. This particular problem already existed many decades ago. The various parties who are entrusted to uphold the safety of our nation and to maintain peace in our country eventually have not done enough until the situation is deteriorated to such nature now.

The most obvious conflict is between national security and human rights. Past years, many security laws like Internal Security Act and Emergency Ordinance were repealed to satisfy and accommodate for the voices of human rights. Unfortunately these laws not sufficiently replaced with new security laws. Therefore the powers of the enforcement and security forces to maintain law and order in Malaysia are limited.

The existence and legitimacy of a country very much depended on the security and preservation of its constitutional requirements. We cannot allowed our beloved country destroyed just because to uphold or fulfill the requirement of certain people in name of human rights. When there is a conflict between human rights and national security, I believe national security should be given the highest consideration because without the existence of a country there will be no humans to enjoy their rights. So, national interest and security are paramount.

What is most important aspect that we need to consider now is how to overcome this current debacle. There are no point blame people without giving any constructive opinions to resolve this problem. Prevention of a crime is not a sole responsibility of the enforcement and security forces.

Firstly, we need to enact new security laws without infringing our constitutional rights. The model of these laws can be taken from Australia [Crime Prevention Powers Act 1998] and United Kingdom [Prevention of Crime Act 1953 - An Act to prohibit the carrying of offensive weapons in public places without lawful authority or reasonable excuse; Crime and Security Act 2010 - An Act to make provision about police powers of stop and search; about the taking, retention, destruction and use of evidential material; for the protection of victims of domestic violence; about injunctions in respect of gang-related violence; about anti-social behaviour orders; about the private security industry; about possession and use of electronic communications devices in prison; about air weapons; for the compensation of victims of overseas terrorism; about licensing the sale and supply of alcohol; about searches in relation to persons subject to control orders; and for connected purposes.] i.e. the crime prevention legislations. Even though we have the Prevention of Crime Act 1959, but this law need to scrutiny further for suitability of the current needs.

Secondly, in UK there is an agency which is known as Serious Organised Crime Agency [SOCA]. The function of this agency is to tackle serious organised crime that affects the UK and its citizens. This includes class A drugs, people smuggling and human trafficking, major gun crime, fraud, computer crime and money laundering. This is a centralized agency. The agency officers can have the collective powers of police, customs and immigration officers. It’s also having a substantial range of tools and legislation to target criminals with the ability to recover assets through to Serious Crime Prevention Orders. They use traditional methods like investigating and arresting criminals. In meanwhile they also incorporated new innovative methods like first class intelligence, monitoring serious career criminals, hitting them where it hurts, working in partnership, worldwide operations and making it harder to commit crime.

We can adopt this model with our own requirements and allow the relevant security and enforcement agencies to work together to prevent the serious crimes happen in Malaysia in future.

Lastly and most importantly, all sectors of people have to work together and they must understand and support the relevant agencies on the crime prevention in Malaysia. The criminals always find cutting-edge ways with security and enforcement agencies to commit a crime. A crime is unsubtle. Prevention is always better than the cure.

Let’s work together and help the relevant agencies to prevent crimes in Malaysia rather than do nothing and blame others all time.
  
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two Tales, Two Leaders - PART 1

Man has dual nature; he is both his own person and a member of his country. On the one hand, the law must protect the individual from the injustices of the multitude.  History has shown how individuals fall prey to mass perversity, their crime being simply a refusal to conform to the beliefs and prejudices of the majority. Anwar Ibrahim, The Asian Renaissance, 1997., Page 63. The value system and ethical code therefore determine the success or failure of corrective measures. If the value system is wrong, corrective measures will not be productive or will be only slightly productive. When the value system motivates, very little corrective measures are needed. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, The Malay Dilemma, 1970., Pages 172-173. Introduction Malaysia is our motherland. We love our country. This country has so much of wealth. Even though, Malaysia has agonized considerably in past three decades because of the malpractices of the corrupted characters but she is never fail t...

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

An Open Letter to Ayahanda Tun - PART 3

For me, to say I want to go to sleep and retire and prepare for my afterlife, I think that is very selfish. Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, The Straits Times – 22 January 2017. This statement is the reflection of ayahanda Tun’s true character. For many of us, he is father of this nation. His love for this nation is unprecedented. Even though he was retired in 2003 but made a comeback in 2018 as the seventh Prime Minster of Malaysia at the age of 93 years. He made a history. At this twilight age, most people would have a ‘quite’ life but not ayahanda.   The biggest question is why ayahanda had to return to active in politics at this age to ‘save’ Malaysia. What are the factors which have triggered him to take such a drastic decision? At that time, Malaysia’s reputation was at the stake because of the kleptocratic regime. In addition, the economic, social and political factors had triggered him to make a comeback. But, the main focal point of his return is the damaged r...