Skip to main content

Terrorism: Cell Strategy

Structure Depends on Organization

Cell Strategy refers to the organizational technique of dividing terrorist organizations into small sub-units that usually interact in a larger network.  Cells can be composed of anywhere between 3-10  individuals.  Many present-day terrorist organizations use some variation of cell strategy.  Cell strategy can be understood to form a continuum ranging from cells that serve as units in a broader hierarchical network to   cells that are self-sustaining units in a non-hierarchical network, depending on the interests and methods of the leadership of the organization.

The three most common forms of cell strategy include the:-

  • traditional cell,
  • the endemic cell (also known as Self Starter Cells) and
  • the sleeper cell. 

Vladimir Lenin as Pioneer

Cell strategy is not new to terrorist organizations, although changes in the international security arena have made it more prevalent now than in the past.  Vladimir Lenin is among the most well-known pioneers of cell strategy.  Leninist parties were built on coalitions of individual cells in a broader network of revolutionaries in order to enhance the security of the rebellion. The same strategy has been used by organizations all over the world in the 20th and 21st century. 

Types of Organizations Who Use Cell Strategy

Robert Bolivar DePugh used cell strategy in establishing the right wing Minutemen organization in the 1960s.  DePugh once claimed that the organization boasted 25,000 members divided into cells of 5-15 men (Marks 1996). The strategy has also been used by, among others, the Basques in Spain, the IRA in Northern Ireland, The Sandistas in Nicaragua, the Army of God in the United States, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Palestine and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.


Source:  http://www.trackingterrorism.org/article/cell-strategy-and-terrorist-groups

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Trump's role in the Israel-Hamas ceasefire

As the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, scheduled to commence on Jan 19, 2025, approaches, it is essential to examine the potential impact of president-elect Donald Trump on this event and Middle East security. Considering Trump’s past foreign policy actions, especially those concerning Israel, alongside the wider geopolitical environment, his prospective role in shaping the ceasefire and future peace initiatives is intricate and layered. Historical influence Trump’s initial term as president was characterised by a robust endorsement of Israel, a position that resonated with his domestic political supporters and simultaneously altered US foreign policy, thereby impacting the wider dynamics of the Middle East. Key actions during this period included the formal acknowledgement of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the transfer of the US embassy to that city, and the withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement. These measures solidified his rapport with Israeli leadership and exemplified his ...