Skip to main content

Passengers-only rule at airports impractical, expert tells Putrajaya

By Nawar Firdaws

PETALING JAYA: Fix the current security measures before implementing new ones which may sound nice on paper, but in reality are impractical.
Terrorologist R Paneir Selvam said this to FMT when commenting on Putrajaya’s proposal to allow only passengers with valid tickets entry into airport terminals for airline check-in.
“While it is good that the Malaysian Government is realising the importance of having better airport security, the said measure would be impossible to implement.
“It would also see Malaysian airports operating differently from all other international airports.
“Why not place better security measures at all of the airport’s exit and entry points, and train all security personnel there on ways to detect any suspicious individuals and behaviour?”
Paneir, who is the chairman of the Association of Legal and Policy Researchers, said a recent news report pointed out the personnel’s lack of experience and training.
The Sun daily had earlier this month carried out an experiment where one of its journalists dressed up as a woman, fully covered up, to infiltrate and check on security alertness at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA).
What the English daily found was a lack of awareness among the airport’s security personnel who did not even glance at the undercover journalist despite her odd behavior and movements.
“That should be looked into first. Rather than banning visitors, the government should increase surveillance and provide ‘profiling’ training for their officers,” added Paneir, a lecturer in terrorism at HELP University.
Last week, Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi was reported as saying that the proposal, discussed at the Cabinet meeting last Wednesday, would mean all other persons, including family members and friends sending off the passengers, would have to remain outside the building.
This would also ensure that other people, who have no business at the airport, will be prevented from entering inside, he added.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives. The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals. Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors. Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare. The 9/11 attacks The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the m...
Post a Comment
Read more