Skip to main content

Strengthening Malaysia’s security: Lessons from Pekan Sungai Golok

IN recent years, Malaysia has encountered a growing array of security threats, notably terrorism, illegal immigration, and transnational criminal activities. The recent terrorist incident in Pekan Sungai Golok, situated on Malaysia’s border with Thailand, highlights the critical need to improve the country’s border security and internal safety protocols.

This attack, which led to civilian casualties and increased anxiety among local residents, has necessitated a reassessment of Malaysia’s security policies.

Impact of the Pekan Sungai Golok terrorist attack

The attack in Pekan Sungai Golok, linked to a terrorist organization with regional affiliations, underscored the vulnerabilities present along Malaysia’s permeable border with Thailand.

This region, frequently characterised by cross-border criminal activities and extremist operations, has raised significant concerns regarding the efficacy of Malaysia’s security framework in monitoring and averting such occurrences.

The incident not only resulted in immediate fatalities but also prompted critical inquiries into the adequacy of Malaysia’s existing border and internal security protocols.

The ramifications of this attack extend beyond immediate public safety concerns, influencing national security strategies.

It has illuminated the potential threats posed by extremist factions within Southeast Asia and their capacity to exploit inadequate border security for unlawful endeavours.

In light of the escalating terrorism challenges in the region, it is imperative for Malaysia to prioritise the enhancement of its border security measures and internal surveillance systems to thwart future attacks and safeguard its populace.

Strategic use of surveillance technology

By examining the experiences of the United States and various African nations with surveillance technologies, Malaysia can improve its capacity to prevent and respond to incidents similar to the attack in Pekan Sungai Golok.

The implementation of surveillance tools, including drones and license plate recognition systems, could be strategically positioned in border regions to observe suspicious activities and monitor terrorist movements in real-time.

This proactive approach would empower security forces to address potential threats before they develop into violent confrontations.

Nonetheless, as demonstrated by the US experience, it is crucial for Malaysia to utilise these technologies in a manner that is transparent and accountable, ensuring that privacy and civil liberties are respected.

The deployment of drones for border surveillance presents an opportunity for Malaysia to oversee remote areas that are challenging to patrol, thereby enhancing the tracking of criminal and terrorist activities.

However, the experiences in Africa highlight the potential for armed drones to inadvertently cause civilian harm.

Consequently, Malaysia must implement stringent regulations and accountability frameworks to mitigate the risk of collateral damage.

The application of these technologies should be approached with a thorough understanding of their effects on local communities, especially in regions with high civilian populations.

Regulation of armed drone usage

In light of the recent attack in Pekan Sungai Golok, the potential application of armed drones warrants consideration as a means to bolster Malaysia’s counter-terrorism capabilities.

Drawing insights from the African context, where the deployment of drones in conflict situations has yielded varied outcomes, it is imperative for Malaysia to utilise drone strikes judiciously and in strict adherence to international legal standards.

The foremost objective should be the precise targeting of terrorist organisations, thereby reducing the likelihood of civilian casualties.

Given the precarious security landscape in Southeast Asia, drones could serve as an essential asset in detecting and mitigating threats along Malaysia’s borders.

Nevertheless, it is crucial for Malaysia to establish a robust legal framework governing drone operation, ensuring ethical deployment and accountability for any inadvertent damage.

Promoting transparency in drone activities, coupled with independent oversight, would be instrumental in fostering public confidence and ensuring the responsible use of these advanced technologies.

Enhanced border security

The terrorist incident in Pekan Sungai Golok underscores the necessity for a unified strategy regarding border security, extending beyond Malaysia to include its neighbouring nations.

The leaky characteristics of Malaysia’s borders with Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines complicate the oversight and regulation of extremist and criminal movements.

It is imperious for Malaysia to enhance its cooperation with ASEAN countries to facilitate intelligence sharing and synchronize border security initiatives.

Collaborative training exercises, platforms for intelligence exchange, and agreements for cross-border monitoring could significantly aid in identifying and thwarting terrorist incursions.

Moreover, the integration of technology, such as drones and surveillance cameras along the borders, could be instrumental in bolstering Malaysia’s capacity to oversee its frontiers and deter terrorist activities.

By leveraging advanced technological solutions, Malaysia can establish a more anticipatory security framework that not only responds to existing threats but also foresees and mitigates potential risks.

Conclusion

The terrorist incident in Pekan Sungai Golok highlights the significant challenges Malaysia encounters in safeguarding its borders and mitigating internal threats.

By drawing insights from international practices related to surveillance and drone technologies, Malaysia has the opportunity to bolster its security framework, particularly concerning border defence and counter-terrorism initiatives.

Nonetheless, it is essential that the implementation of these technologies is approached with care, ensuring that their application does not compromise civil liberties or result in unintended consequences.

To enhance Malaysia’s security in response to this incident, a holistic strategy is essential, encompassing technological advancements, regional collaboration, and a steadfast commitment to human rights.

Through the establishment of clear guidelines, effective oversight, and international partnerships, Malaysia can cultivate a more robust security infrastructure that safeguards its populace while upholding their fundamental rights. 

Source: https://focusmalaysia.my/strengthening-malaysias-security-lessons-from-pekan-sungai-golok/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.