Skip to main content

Anwar’s Leadership Crucial in ASEAN’s Conflict Test

The violent border clashes between Thailand and Cambodia have thrust Malaysia’s Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim into the spotlight not just as a concerned regional leader, but as the current Chair of ASEAN.

With at least nine civilians dead, multiple injuries, airstrikes, and diplomatic relations downgraded, this conflict is no longer a bilateral issue but it is a regional crisis that demands a strong, strategic response.

Anwar’s actions now will shape both the trajectory of this conflict and ASEAN’s credibility as a peace-promoting institution.

So far, Anwar has taken the first step: calling for peace and reaching out to his counterparts in both countries. But expressions of concern, while important, are not sufficient.

The region has already seen the cost of delayed and passive diplomacy in Myanmar. Anwar must lead ASEAN beyond this pattern of cautious disengagement.

As ASEAN Chair, Anwar should immediately call for an emergency ASEAN Summit or a Special Meeting of Foreign Ministers specifically on the Thailand-Cambodia crisis.

This forum would allow for ASEAN to consolidate its position and craft a unified message, one that pushes both countries toward de-escalation while offering concrete mechanisms for negotiation.

Anwar should also advocate for the activation of ASEAN’s long-neglected peace mechanisms particularly the High Council under the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC). This body was created to mediate disputes and prevent armed conflict among member states.

By invoking the TAC, Anwar would give Thailand and Cambodia a diplomatic channel to resolve the dispute without either side appearing to back down under external pressure.

Furthermore, Malaysia could push for the deployment of neutral ASEAN observers to monitor the border and ensure both sides adhere to a ceasefire, should one be agreed upon. This would be a confidence-building measure and a sign of ASEAN’s seriousness in preventing further bloodshed.

Malaysia’s historically strong bilateral relations with both Thailand and Cambodia uniquely position Anwar to act as a trusted intermediary. While public statements are necessary, Anwar can also engage in quiet, backchannel diplomacy that offering Kuala Lumpur as a neutral ground for talks or sending senior Malaysian diplomats as envoys to both sides.

Anwar’s political standing and reputation as a reform-minded leader give him the credibility to be seen as an impartial peacemaker. If anyone in ASEAN can speak frankly with both Bangkok and Phnom Penh and still maintain diplomatic goodwill, it is him.

The Myanmar civil conflict should serve as a warning for Anwar and ASEAN. The regional bloc’s slow, hands-off approach in that crisis allowed violence and instability to deepen. ASEAN’s credibility suffered, and its “Five-Point Consensus” remains largely unfulfilled.

If similar inertia defines the response to the Thailand-Cambodia border clash, ASEAN risks further diminishing its relevance and worse, normalizing violence as a method of dispute resolution within the bloc.

Anwar must ensure that ASEAN does not repeat this mistake. Unlike the Myanmar military junta, both Thailand and Cambodia remain engaged in ASEAN and have signalled interest in resolving the issue. This makes the current conflict more solvable but only with active, early intervention.

This moment is not just a test for ASEAN; it is a personal and diplomatic test for Anwar Ibrahim. His leadership can either push ASEAN into a new era of proactive conflict management or allow it to slide further into irrelevance.

By spearheading regional dialogue, activating ASEAN’s mediation tools, and using Malaysia’s bilateral influence wisely, Anwar can broker not just a ceasefire, but a process that de-escalates tensions in a lasting way. He can help ASEAN evolve from a passive observer to a responsible regional actor.

In doing so, Anwar would not only serve Malaysia’s national interest in a stable neighbourhood but he would leave a mark as a transformative ASEAN Chair who chose leadership over hesitation, peace over politics, and decisive diplomacy over delayed response.

The opportunity is rare. The responsibility is great. And the time to act is now.

Kuala Lumpur.

25.07.2025 at 10.40 a.m.

© All rights reserved.

https://focusmalaysia.my/anwars-leadership-crucial-in-aseans-conflict-test/

Note: By the time the article is published at focusmalaysia.my/, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, on Friday, 25 July 2025 at 7:36 PM MYT, announced that Thailand and Cambodia had agreed to a ceasefire and to withdraw their troops from the border.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two Tales, Two Leaders - PART 1

Man has dual nature; he is both his own person and a member of his country. On the one hand, the law must protect the individual from the injustices of the multitude.  History has shown how individuals fall prey to mass perversity, their crime being simply a refusal to conform to the beliefs and prejudices of the majority. Anwar Ibrahim, The Asian Renaissance, 1997., Page 63. The value system and ethical code therefore determine the success or failure of corrective measures. If the value system is wrong, corrective measures will not be productive or will be only slightly productive. When the value system motivates, very little corrective measures are needed. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, The Malay Dilemma, 1970., Pages 172-173. Introduction Malaysia is our motherland. We love our country. This country has so much of wealth. Even though, Malaysia has agonized considerably in past three decades because of the malpractices of the corrupted characters but she is never fail t...

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Trump's role in the Israel-Hamas ceasefire

As the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, scheduled to commence on Jan 19, 2025, approaches, it is essential to examine the potential impact of president-elect Donald Trump on this event and Middle East security. Considering Trump’s past foreign policy actions, especially those concerning Israel, alongside the wider geopolitical environment, his prospective role in shaping the ceasefire and future peace initiatives is intricate and layered. Historical influence Trump’s initial term as president was characterised by a robust endorsement of Israel, a position that resonated with his domestic political supporters and simultaneously altered US foreign policy, thereby impacting the wider dynamics of the Middle East. Key actions during this period included the formal acknowledgement of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the transfer of the US embassy to that city, and the withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement. These measures solidified his rapport with Israeli leadership and exemplified his ...