Skip to main content

Malaysia’s Strategic Balance Between SCO and QUAD

In today’s increasingly polarized global landscape, small and middle powers face growing pressure to pick sides in the rivalries between major geopolitical blocs.

For Malaysia, a country strategically located in the heart of Southeast Asia, navigating this high-stakes environment requires a delicate balance between maintaining national sovereignty and leveraging the benefits of global partnerships.

This balancing act was brought into sharp focus during the 25th Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, hosted by China in Tianjin on June 25–26, 2025.

The summit, centred on counter-terrorism, regional stability, and economic integration, reflected the SCO’s broader agenda, one that aligns with Chinese and Russian interests and often positions itself as a counterweight to Western influence.

Meanwhile, the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) made up of the United States, Japan, India, and Australia continues to push its vision of a “free and open Indo-Pacific.”

The QUAD emphasizes democratic values, maritime security, and rules-based order, offering a starkly different approach to regional cooperation.

Caught between these competing narratives, many smaller nations are being nudged toward alignment. But Malaysia has chosen a different path.

Rather than siding outright with either bloc, it has embraced a policy of strategic hedging engaging with both sides while avoiding full commitment to either.

This approach allows Malaysia to preserve its autonomy, avoid dependence on any single power, and extract economic and security benefits from both relationships.

As global power dynamics grow more complex, Malaysia’s diplomatic flexibility may serve as a model for other middle powers seeking to stay afloat in turbulent geopolitical waters.

A History of Non-Alignment

Malaysia’s posture is rooted in its long-standing foreign policy doctrine of non-alignment and regional neutrality. Since the Cold War era, successive Malaysian governments have resisted the temptation of bloc politics.

Malaysia was a founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), and its current strategies echo the same principle: engage, but not entangle.

This stance has gained renewed relevance amid intensifying Sino-American rivalry, of which both the SCO and QUAD are byproducts.

While Malaysia is not a formal member of either, its interactions with both camps reveal a sophisticated diplomacy aimed at navigating complex power dynamics without compromising its national interests.

Engaging the SCO: Economic and Regional Stability

Malaysia has shown openness to the SCO, particularly in areas of counterterrorism cooperation, economic engagement, and connectivity.

Although not a member, Malaysia has engaged with the SCO through dialogue platforms, particularly via China, which remains Malaysia’s largest trading partner.

For Malaysia, engaging with the SCO provides several benefits. First, it aligns with Putrajaya’s desire to diversify its security partnerships beyond traditional Western ties.

Second, Malaysia views the SCO as a potential avenue for fostering regional stability in Central and South Asia regions that impact Southeast Asia through trade, migration, and extremism.

Moreover, Malaysia’s deepening ties with China under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) with investments in infrastructure projects like the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) indirectly link it to SCO-aligned interests.

While wary of overdependence on China, Malaysia uses the SCO platform to reinforce economic cooperation without fully committing to the group’s strategic posture.

Embracing the QUAD

Simultaneously, Malaysia maintains strong security and economic ties with the QUAD members. It regularly conducts joint military exercises with the United States, Australia, and Japan, and benefits from defence capacity-building initiatives.

These engagements are seen less as a provocation to China and more as part of Malaysia’s long-standing effort to modernize its armed forces and ensure maritime security, particularly in the South China Sea.

Malaysia supports the QUAD’s emphasis on rules-based order, particularly freedom of navigation and overflight principles critical to a trade-dependent nation like Malaysia.

Yet it does so without explicitly endorsing the group’s more confrontational posture toward China. Malaysia’s goal is not to antagonize Beijing but to uphold its own maritime claims and sovereignty in contested waters.

ASEAN Centrality as Strategic Shield

A key pillar of Malaysia’s strategy is its insistence on ASEAN centrality. Rather than align exclusively with either SCO or QUAD, Malaysia consistently emphasizes the importance of ASEAN-led mechanisms like the East Asia Summit and the ASEAN Regional Forum.

These platforms provide a multilateral buffer against great power rivalry and allow Malaysia to engage all major players on more equal footing.

Malaysia also champions initiatives like the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP), which, unlike the QUAD’s vision, stresses inclusivity and dialogue.

This allows Malaysia to subtly push back against both Western and Chinese pressures, while presenting itself as a constructive bridge-builder in a fragmented region.

Strategic Autonomy, Not Indecision

Critics may interpret Malaysia’s dual engagement as indecision or opportunism, but such a view underestimates the complexity of small-state diplomacy. Malaysia’s strategy reflects a calculated effort to maximize agency in a crowded geopolitical arena.

By keeping both SCO and QUAD at arm’s length, Malaysia retains the freedom to manoeuvre leveraging economic ties with China and strategic cooperation with the West without overcommitting to either.

In fact, this approach has helped Malaysia avoid the fate of becoming a proxy in great power competition. It continues to attract investment from both camps, maintains robust trade across ideological divides, and asserts its regional priorities on its own terms.

Malaysia’s balancing act between the SCO and QUAD illustrates the evolving art of middle-power diplomacy. In a time of heightened polarisation, it demonstrates that strategic autonomy remains a viable path for states unwilling to be drawn into zero-sum alignments.

Rather than picking sides, Malaysia is picking its battles which are focused on economic resilience, territorial integrity, and regional stability.

As great power rivalry intensifies, the Malaysian model of pragmatic neutrality could serve as a template for other nations caught in the geopolitical crossfire.

1.7.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© Copyright is reserved.

https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/748196

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.