UK Court Case: Victims of Libya Torture and Rendition Sue Her Majesty’s Government, British Secret Service, Attorney General
As a High Court hearing on UK involvement in torture and
rendition enters its third day, documents released detail the ordeal
faced by the pregnant wife of a Gaddafi opponent during her 2004
‘rendition.’
Fatima Boudchar and her husband Abdul-Hakim Belhadj are bringing a
claim against the Government, MI6 and then-Foreign Secretary Jack Straw
over their role in the kidnap and forcible transfer of the couple to
Gaddafi’s prisons – in what has been described as the secret counterpart
to Tony Blair’s ‘Deal in the Desert’ with the Libyan dictator.
Court documents released today, prepared by the couple’s legal team
and human rights charity Reprieve, describe how Ms Boudchar – who was
heavily pregnant at the time – was blindfolded, taken to a cell and
“chained to the wall by one hand and one leg,” before being “taped to a
stretcher tightly making her fear for her baby” and forced on board a
CIA jet.
“Upon arrival in Tripoli,” they go on to say, “the First Claimant [Mr
Belhadj] was beaten again. The Second Claimant [Ms Boudchar] could no
longer feel her baby move in her womb and was concerned that he had
died. Both Claimants were taken to Tajoura prison, a detention facility
operated by the Libyan intelligence services.”
The documents detail MI6’s part in the operation, noting that “On 18
March 2004, the Second Defendant sent a letter to Moussa Koussa, the
head of the Libyan External Security Organisation, warmly congratulating
him on the successful capture, kidnap and abduction of the First
Claimant.”
MI6’s part in the operation is highlighted in a now-infamous fax from
Sir Mark Allen (who is also a defendant in the case along with Jack
Straw), which states that: “Amusingly, we got a request from the
Americans to channel requests for information from [the First Claimant]
through the Americans. I have no intention of doing any such thing. The
intelligence about [the First Claimant] was British. I know I did not
pay for the air cargo. But I feel I have the right to deal with you
direct on this and am very grateful to you for the help you are giving
us”
The court documents, which set out the argument being made in today’s
hearing by the couple’s lawyers, also point out that the Government’s
attempt to get the case thrown out is “incompatible with the rule of law
and has grave constitutional implications,” adding that, “If the
Defendants are correct, it will leave anyone who is a victim of torture
without any remedy if another state was involved in some way in the
conduct.”
They also point out that the Government’s case contradicts claims
ministers made when seeking to introduce new secret courts earlier this
year under the Justice and Security Act: “The Defendants’ position is
also incompatible with the Government’s recent programme of legislative
reform. The Justice and Security Act 2013 included provisions for closed
material procedures to deal with what was said to be the problem of
claims such as the instant one. This was predicated on the basis that
such claims would proceed. The Defendants now ask the Court to do what
they did not seek to do in Parliament.”
Commenting, Reprieve’s Strategic Director, Cori Crider said:
“Britain’s collusion in the kidnap and abuse of a pregnant woman shows
just how far we strayed from our principles in the so called ‘War on
Terror.’ It is now clear that the renditions of Abdul-Hakim Belhadj and
Fatima Boudchar were the dark underside to Tony Blair’s deal in the
desert, yet neither he, then-Foreign Secretary Jack Straw nor the
current Government are prepared to give our clients the apology they
deserve. Instead they are running a specious and immoral argument that
British Courts cannot judge British officials when they are said to have
conspired with foreign torturers. Moussa Koussa was MI6′s
co-conspirator, not a get out of jail free card.”
Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/uk-court-case-victims-of-libya-torture-and-rendition-sue-her-majestys-government-british-secret-service-attorney-general/5355271
Comments