National Security and Terrorism By Mike Doyle

-
One of the most pressing foreign policy issues facing the United States today is the threat posed by Islamist terrorists like al Qaeda – especially if they manage to get their hands on weapons of mass destruction.
While the number of terrorists we face is relatively small – probably no more than a few thousand – the challenge of finding and stopping them is great. For starters, we need to avoid turning our Muslim friends and allies into enemies by violating their civil rights here in the United States and by invading Muslim countries abroad with little or no justification.
I believe the Bush Administration badly bungled the War on Terror. We should never have invaded Iraq. Instead, we should have focused our efforts and our scarce resources – like our military special forces units and Arabic translators – on tracking down al Qaeda and its supporters.
Moreover, we should have done a better job of putting together a coalition of nations to track down and neutralize al Qaeda. There was a tremendous amount of sympathy and support around the world for the United States in the wake of 9/11, and I believe the Bush administration squandered that resource by pursuing its misguided unilateral approach to fighting terrorism.
I believe that the Bush Administration made another serious misstep when it authorized inhumane and unusual interrogation tactics for terrorist suspects and sent some suspects to countries where a number of them have almost certainly been tortured. Not only has this Administration run roughshod over our treasured Constitutional rights, but it has destroyed our country’s reputation as a paragon of individual liberty and the rule of law and alienated important and potential allies around the world. It’s a harsh irony that most intelligence experts believe that torture and other questionable interrogation tactics usually produce inaccurate information.
I have also voted against reauthorization of several expiring provisions of the so-called Patriot Act, which reduce the privacy rights of Americans who may have done nothing illegal.
The death of Osama bin Laden was welcome news for the United States, but the threat of terrorism remains real, and the US Government must continue to work to prevent terrorist attacks and prepare our first responders to deal with any likely threats.  I believe we can successfully do that without suspending or abridging the civil liberties we have historically enjoyed, and I am committed to doing so.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

US Offensive Strategy in 2026: Hegemony, Force & Interests

-
The United States’ offensive strategy in 2026, as it is taking shape under President Donald Trump’s second term, reflects a profound shift in how American power is conceived and deployed. The 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) abandons the post–Cold War emphasis on liberal internationalism and instead embraces a hard-edged, transactional vision of national interest. “America First” is no longer merely a slogan; it has become a governing doctrine that fuses military force, economic leverage, and political coercion into a single strategic framework. The recent U.S. military action against Venezuela, culminating in the capture of Nicolás Maduro, offers a revealing case study of this new offensive posture and signals what the rest of the world should expect from Washington in 2026. At the heart of the current NSS is a redefinition of threats and priorities. The document frames the international system as a zero-sum arena in which American decline can only be arrested through decisiv...
Read more

Violence Reaches Everywhere, Even the Familiar

-
The shootings at Bondi Beach and Brown University are not isolated aberrations; they are part of a wider and troubling pattern in which violence increasingly intrudes into spaces once considered safe, ordinary, and socially cohesive. Beaches, campuses, shopping areas, religious gatherings, and cultural events have all, at different times and in different countries, become stages for lethal attacks. What distinguishes Bondi and Brown is not novelty, but how clearly, they illustrate the evolving nature of public violence: its targets, its logic, and its consequences. Bondi Beach represents one category of violence that has appeared repeatedly over the past two decades: attacks on open, symbolic public spaces. Similar incidents have occurred at promenades, concert venues, markets, and holiday destinations across the world. The logic is brutally simple. Such spaces offer dense crowds, minimal security, and maximum visibility. When an attack coincides with a cultural or religious gath...
Read more

Malaysia’s Democratic Crossroads and the Politics of Repetition - Part 2

-
Image
  If Tamil Nadu represents the arrival of a new political model, Malaysia represents the danger of political déjà vu. The conditions that enabled Vijay’s rise - economic frustration, distrust in political elites, voter fatigue, and digital political transformation are increasingly visible within Malaysia’s own political landscape. The difference is that Malaysia has already experienced regime change. What it now faces is something arguably more dangerous: democratic disappointment. The Pakatan Harapan - Barisan Nasional coalition governs under an unusual paradox. It is a government born from reformist aspirations but increasingly perceived as resembling the political system it once promised to dismantle. This perception is not a minor communications problem as it is a structural political risk. Governments are judged not only on outcomes but on symbolic differentiation. When Pakatan Harapan first emerged as a credible governing force in 2018, it embodied rupture. It promised instit...
Read more