Skip to main content

People, Security and Terrorism

Last Sunday, Southern Thailand was terrorized by unknown separatist groups.

The involvement of The United Front for the Independence of Pattani, Pattani United Libertaion Organsiation (PULO), New PULO and Barisan Revolusi Nasional Melayu Pattani (BRN) until this moment is unknown. 

Two Indian peacekeepers were killed by terrorist in South Sudan. Two alleged terrorists who involved in brutal murder of an army man in Woolwich were also successfully convicted by British court a few days ago.

Recently in Sabah, a tourist was killed and his companion was kidnapped by a terrorist group. Later on, the female companion was recused by the Philippines enforcement agencies officers. 

Terrorism no longer yearly event. It's became a routine.

Like in Thailand, after the terrorist attack people especially the tourists are back and they said there is no problem.

This is VERY serious.

Why??

We cannot accept terrorism as a norm.

Terrorism involve death of so many people. 

Life is meaningless for terrorist as one had indicated as above.

State has the duty to protect it's people. Security of  a nation is paramount. So, the state must adhere with total commitments to upheld the peace and security of that nation.

Terrorist do not observed the rule of law all the times. Therefore use of law to punish them is irrelevant.

Then again, human rights will be a issue.

In my opinion, human rights is only acceptable for the people who had respected the rights of an ordinary person and not to someone who had rejected this notion outright.

Terrorist is always reject the notion of human rights.

Therefore the state has a duty to take the necessary measures to prevent, prosecute and punish the terrorist who endangers the life ordinary citizens in that state. 

Meanwhile the state has duty to identify and punish the 'real' terrorist not the terrorist who is threat to their power in the said state.   

Kuala Lumpur


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the FĂȘte de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.