Australia: Listing of terrorist organisations

-
For an effective counter-terrorism regime, it is vital that our laws target not only terrorist acts, but also the organisations that plan, finance and carry out such acts. In 2002, a range of new terrorist organisation offences were enacted enabling the Government to deal with organisations involved in terrorism.
  • Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002
These offences apply in relation to ‘terrorist organisations’. Under the law, there are two ways for an organisation to be identified as a 'terrorist organisation'. Either an organisation may be found to be such an organisation by a court as part of the prosecution for a terrorist offence, or it may be specified in Regulations, known as ‘listing’. For a listing to be effective, the processes set out in the legislation must be followed.

The Government has prepared a listing protocol outlining the process and requirements that apply to the listing of terrorist organisations.

There are 18 organisations now officially listed. They are:
  • Abu Sayyaf Group
  • Al-Qa'ida (AQ)
  • Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)
  • Al-Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI) (formerly listed as Al-Zarqawi and TQJBR)
  • Al-Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)
  • Al-Shabaab
  • Ansar al-Islam (formerly known as Ansar al-Sunna)
  • Hamas’s Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades
  • Hizballah External Security Organisation
  • Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU)
  • Jabhat al-Nusra
  • Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM)
  • Jamiat ul-Ansar (JuA) formerly known as Harakat Ul-Mujahideen
  • Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) -
  • Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK)
  • Lashkar-e Jhangvi (LeJ)
  • Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT)
  • Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ)
Source:
http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/agd/www/nationalsecurity.nsf/AllDocs/95FB057CA3DECF30CA256FAB001F7FBD

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

-
In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...
Read more

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

-
The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...
Read more

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

-
7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.
Read more