Skip to main content

“Regain public trust, Pakatan…and election win will come naturally” (Part 2)

TOUCHING a little on the UK history, because of the “Winter of Discontent” between 1978–1979, when the UK had a series of massive strikes organised by trade unions, the UK Labour Party was deposed in 1979 by the Conservative Party led by Margaret Thatcher.  

Following the defeat, the Labour Party experienced internal upheaval, which damaged the party’s position among the public.  

However, Neil Kinnock, took over as party leader in 1983 and he immediately initiated the moderation process. Kinnock’s successors as party leaders, John Smith and Tony Blair, carried on with this process.  

In the 1997 general election, “armed” with the “New Labour” agenda, along with highly professionalised political marketing and a majority of youthful and female candidates, the Labour Party enjoyed a landslide victory.  

Tony Blair was then appointed prime minister at the age of 43, after the Labour Party being out of power for 18 years. 

Some of the reforms promised in their manifesto were implemented, such as assisting in the formation of an agreement between Republicans and Unionists in Northern Ireland, modernising the format of “Prime Minister’s Question Time,” during which the prime minister is required to answer questions from the opposition in person, holding referendums on the introduction of the euro currency and electoral reforms.  

As a result, Tony Blair was re-elected prime minister again in 2001.  

Because of their opposing ideals and political ideologies, the UK Labour Party will not join forces with the UK Conservative Party. Similarly, in the US, Democrats and Republicans will not get along due to opposing ideological beliefs. 

Hence, the “New Labour” experience and approach should serve as a model for Pakatan to move forward and reform itself. They must realise that they are up against a formidable opponent that continues to garner significant support from other stakeholders despite massive public distrust.  

And by signing the MOU with the Government, which UMNO is a part of, voters are confused and jaded. One cannot be faulted if they think Pakatan and UMNO are “twin brothers”. They feel duped because of the MoU.  

Young voters are the key  

Unfortunately, Pakatan leaders are still unable to see this. If they continue to remain oblivious to this, then be prepared for more electoral defeats.  

On that note, I wonder why senior Malaysian politicians have problems retiring gracefully. Some old leaders refuse to quit even after being told to their face!  

A competent leader will know when to step down and let the next generation to lead the party, like the UK Labour Party did.  

Younger leaders are becoming presidents or prime ministers all around the world. President Emmanuel Macron of France, Prime Minister Alexander De Croo of Belgium, Prime Minister Sanna Marin of Finland and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand are just a few examples. 

International politics is currently at this paradigm shift and Malaysia’s younger population is anticipating such a change. The question is whether the Pakatan can match the expectations of young people who want to be active in state governance. 

For the sake of the coalition’s survival in this country, its leaders must set aside their personal political interests but whether they are willing to look at the bigger picture is a million-dollar question.  

But I take comfort that senior politicians are slowly and surely losing their influence among younger voters. The youngsters hold no emotional attachment to these leaders and are prepared take up the leadership mantle.  

And this is where political parties like the Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA) can come in., provided they do not fall into the ways of politicians who should have retired 20 years ago but still hanging on. – April 19, 2022 

Source: https://focusmalaysia.my/regain-public-trust-pakatanand-election-win-will-come-naturally-part-2/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Terrorism in Africa

According to state.gov, ISIS was defeated a few years ago. However, the organization's presence and existence remain conspicuous in Africa. Ongoing conflicts in Somalia, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso demonstrate that ISIS has shifted its focus away from Iraq and Syria. Although ISIS lacks a clear hierarchy like Al-Qaeda, its followers and supporters wholeheartedly believe in its strong ideology. In 2014, the United States led the formation of a broad international coalition known as 'The Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS' to combat the organization during the height of the Syrian and Iraqi conflict. The primary objectives of this 83-member coalition are to degrade and defeat ISIS, which poses a threat to international peace and security. ISIS has brought thousands of foreign fighters from around the world to combat zones like Syria and Iraq, and it has used technology to promote its violent extremist ideology and instigate terrorist attacks. For example, t

Sedition Act 1948 should have been repealed a long time ago. But why?

THE Sedition Act 1948 is a legislative measure that was enacted in Malaysia during the colonial era, designed to curb any form of speech or expression that was deemed to be seditious in nature with the aim of maintaining public order and security. The Sedition Act has been subject to much debate and criticism, with some arguing that it is a violation of freedom of speech and expression. Despite this, the Act remains in force in Malaysia to this day, albeit with some amendments made over the years. Although I concur with the abolition of this Act, it is imperative that a comparable new legislation be enacted to address the escalating prevalence of racially and religiously bigoted remarks that have been unsettling our distinctive multicultural and multi-religious society as of late. An instance that exemplifies the prudent decision-making of the governing body is the substitution of the Internal Security Act of 1960 with the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA). This rep

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i