Skip to main content

“Malaysian Indians: How MIC divided an already fragmented community (Part 1)”

 BASED on indicators, the general election will be held soon. The results of the last four state elections, coupled with the sterling performance of Barisan Nasional (BN), is adding pressure to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob to dissolve the Parliament soon.

Some are calling the 15th General Election as the “mother of all elections”. The race between the Government and opposition parties is tight one. This is a make-or-break situation. However, it seems like the mood favours BN.

This election is not like the previous one, where the 14th election only pitted two coalitions against one other – BN and Pakatan Harapan (Pakatan).

This time, Pakatan is severely weakened following Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia’s (Bersatu) defection and the non-committal mood by Parti Warisan Sabah and Parti Pejuang Tanah Air towards the former.

Following its departure from Pakatan, Bersatu has formed a new coalition, Perikatan Nasional (Perikatan) which includes PAS and Gerakan.

As for the regions of Sarawak and Sabah, Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) and the Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) in Sabah hold massive sway among their voters. It will be fascinating to see with whom these coalitions will establish agreements with: BN, Pakatan or Perikatan.

Another element that will influence the outcome of this election is Undi18. It is to note that the four state elections were held with COVID-19 restriction in place, hence, with the borders reopened, the general election will be a very different ballgame altogether.

Now, what I want to address here is the Indian votes. Their votes are important in any election since they can affect the outcome in certain constituencies as seen in the past elections. As a result, Indians must be diligent in vetting the individuals who will represent their interests in this country.

In this article, we will look at the next general election from the eyes of Indians. Despite the fact that Indians constitute one of Malaysia’s three major races, their well-being is has been neglected for decades.

Indians and Malaysia

Indians in our country are feeling marginalised. In 2007, the rally organised by the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) shocked the nation and drew public attention to the community’s discontent.

While we can criticise the Government for the sorry state Indians are in today, the true perpetrators, in my opinion, were the Indian leaders themselves who were more concerned about enriching themselves and their cronies than with improving the welfare of their community.

It also boils down to the community’s failure to remove the corrupt and egotistical Indian leaders in the past. Unfortunately, this pattern still remains.

I have always believed that the present and past Governments’ policies were fair to the community. However, the Indian leaders from the ruling party and little Napoleons within the Government apparatus entrusted with implementing these policies have utterly failed.

The MIC is one of Malaysia’s oldest political parties. It has always claimed to be the defenders of Indian issues. They also successfully prevented other Indian political parties such as the Indian Progressive Front (IPF) from joining BN.

As a result of this attitude, a number of Indian-based political parties were formed, fragmenting the community even further which is already divided by sub-caste and sub-race associations. As a result, the community has become even more polarised.

And the same fate is being shared by many Indian members of multiracial parties like PKR and the DAP. With a population of less than 7%, their collective political voice is becoming less appealing.

MIC was nearly wiped out in the previous general election, winning only the Tapah parliamentary seat. This is owing to the community’s rejection of the party’s leadership style that has been passed down since the late 1970s, centred on themselves rather than the community as a whole.

Even though MIC did well in the recent Johor state election by winning three state seats, this is not really reflective of the voters’ sentiments, particularly Indians.  One of the reasons BN won is due to poor voter turnout as a result of the COVID-19 restrictions.

Therefore, it is better for MIC leaders not get over-confident in their ability to gain significant seats in the upcoming election since voters, particularly Indian voters, are still dissatisfied with the current and previous misdeeds committed by these leaders that have hampered their advancement. – April 10, 2022.

Source: https://focusmalaysia.my/malaysian-indians-how-mic-divided-an-already-fragmented-community-part-1/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.