Skip to main content

“Regain public trust, Pakatan…and election win will come naturally” (Part 2)

TOUCHING a little on the UK history, because of the “Winter of Discontent” between 1978–1979, when the UK had a series of massive strikes organised by trade unions, the UK Labour Party was deposed in 1979 by the Conservative Party led by Margaret Thatcher.  

Following the defeat, the Labour Party experienced internal upheaval, which damaged the party’s position among the public.  

However, Neil Kinnock, took over as party leader in 1983 and he immediately initiated the moderation process. Kinnock’s successors as party leaders, John Smith and Tony Blair, carried on with this process.  

In the 1997 general election, “armed” with the “New Labour” agenda, along with highly professionalised political marketing and a majority of youthful and female candidates, the Labour Party enjoyed a landslide victory.  

Tony Blair was then appointed prime minister at the age of 43, after the Labour Party being out of power for 18 years. 

Some of the reforms promised in their manifesto were implemented, such as assisting in the formation of an agreement between Republicans and Unionists in Northern Ireland, modernising the format of “Prime Minister’s Question Time,” during which the prime minister is required to answer questions from the opposition in person, holding referendums on the introduction of the euro currency and electoral reforms.  

As a result, Tony Blair was re-elected prime minister again in 2001.  

Because of their opposing ideals and political ideologies, the UK Labour Party will not join forces with the UK Conservative Party. Similarly, in the US, Democrats and Republicans will not get along due to opposing ideological beliefs. 

Hence, the “New Labour” experience and approach should serve as a model for Pakatan to move forward and reform itself. They must realise that they are up against a formidable opponent that continues to garner significant support from other stakeholders despite massive public distrust.  

And by signing the MOU with the Government, which UMNO is a part of, voters are confused and jaded. One cannot be faulted if they think Pakatan and UMNO are “twin brothers”. They feel duped because of the MoU.  

Young voters are the key  

Unfortunately, Pakatan leaders are still unable to see this. If they continue to remain oblivious to this, then be prepared for more electoral defeats.  

On that note, I wonder why senior Malaysian politicians have problems retiring gracefully. Some old leaders refuse to quit even after being told to their face!  

A competent leader will know when to step down and let the next generation to lead the party, like the UK Labour Party did.  

Younger leaders are becoming presidents or prime ministers all around the world. President Emmanuel Macron of France, Prime Minister Alexander De Croo of Belgium, Prime Minister Sanna Marin of Finland and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand are just a few examples. 

International politics is currently at this paradigm shift and Malaysia’s younger population is anticipating such a change. The question is whether the Pakatan can match the expectations of young people who want to be active in state governance. 

For the sake of the coalition’s survival in this country, its leaders must set aside their personal political interests but whether they are willing to look at the bigger picture is a million-dollar question.  

But I take comfort that senior politicians are slowly and surely losing their influence among younger voters. The youngsters hold no emotional attachment to these leaders and are prepared take up the leadership mantle.  

And this is where political parties like the Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (MUDA) can come in., provided they do not fall into the ways of politicians who should have retired 20 years ago but still hanging on. – April 19, 2022 

Source: https://focusmalaysia.my/regain-public-trust-pakatanand-election-win-will-come-naturally-part-2/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.