Skip to main content

“UMNO digging a grave for Pakatan…with the latter providing shovels” (Part 1)

IN the last general election, Pakatan Harapan (Pakatan) received strong public support. The Sheraton Move, however, eroded public morale on the coalition after Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu) betrayed its coalition members and formed Perikatan Nasional with UMNO and PAS.  

Political instability followed and coupled with COVID-19, the public have seemingly lost faith in their elected leaders in the past two years. Making matters worse, Pakatan’s series of gaffes following their ouster from Putrajaya eroded public trust on them as well.  

Pakatan’s attempts to reclaim power were thwarted after UMNO employed several “correct” strategies. The memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed between the Government and Pakatan have indeed brought some level of political stability to the country but it had backfired tremendously on the Opposition’s credibility.  

BN vs Pakatan  

Last week, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri announced that he will accept UMNO supreme council’s decision not to prolong the MOU beyond July 31. Some UMNO leaders even deflected the blame on Pakatan for it! 

Unfortunately, several Pakatan leaders, despite being veterans, continue to fall for UMNO’s “mind games”.  They keep swallowing UMNO’s narrative and emphasised that the agreement is between Pakatan and the current Government, led by the Prime Minister.  

It is ridiculous that Pakatan missed the part where UMNO is part of the Government and it wields considerable influence in the prime minister’s decisions! By deflecting the blame on Pakatan, UMNO is actually testing their response before mooting strategies to defeat the Opposition in the 15th General Election.  

It is puzzling that even veteran Opposition leaders are acting so naïve. To its credit, UMNO is being very Machiavellian in its approach and it looks like they have taken time to study Sun Tzu’s strategies to defeat their opponents.  

Interestingly enough, former PKR vice president Nurul Izzah Anwar recently stated that the Pakatan will not be able to win the upcoming election and the coalition will not be able to win back Putrajaya for at least one decade.  

Unsurprisingly, several PKR leaders jumped out to disagree with her assessment but from my observation, I agree with Nurul Izzah’s prediction. Pakatan’s 22-months in power was nothing short of a catastrophe and UMNO is “playing them out” even now.  

So, what was Pakatan’s flaws in their 22-months hold on Putrajaya? To begin with, they got too busy countering UMNO’s attacks instead of instituting reforms and implementing the promises made.  

If you study Malaysian politics since the 1960s, you will realise that it has always been centred on the 3R (race, religion and royalty) strategy. UMNO has been using this narrative effectively for decades to undermine its opponents.  

And Pakatan, despite holding Putrajaya, still fell for UMNO’s 3R strategy! Pakatan leaders could have used the opportunity by instituting reforms in the Government such as strengthening the independence of the judiciary, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and the police.  

They could have also taken the time to at least, fulfil the pledges made in their own election manifesto which surely would have endeared them to the voters.  

We can all agree that Pakatan’s reign was short-lived but voters see things differently. The public saw how Pakatan was devoting too much attention to subjects that were inconsequential to them. The public wants real change, not cosmetic reforms that have no bearing on the country’s future.  

The question now for Pakatan is how to regain public’s trust. This should be the priority instead winning the next general election. Besides, Pakatan leaders should realise that once public trust is there, winning an election is a direct consequence of it.  

So, it is no-brainer that Pakatan should start endearing itself to the public again but how do it?  

Address issue affecting the people 

Firstly, they must explore why voters chose them in 2018. Why the people, who massively favoured them in 2018, are now shunning them?  

Subsequently, like or not, all those Pakatan leaders who tried to endear themselves to UMNO and BN after the Sheraton Move must go. Either they should take the back seats or retire gracefully.  

Thirdly, all those advisers and strategists who encouraged Pakatan leadership to cooperate with UMNO must also be dismissed. They should never be part of Pakatan’s future endeavours. 

Another thing that Pakatan should seriously pay attention to is the Undi18 voters. These massive group of youngsters will decide on Pakatan and BN’s political fortunes sooner than anyone thinks.  

They are distinct from older voters as these group of youths can see the difference between horse manure and what is real…especially when it is coming out from a politician’s mouth!  

Younger generation of voters want to hear real strategies and ideas especially when it comes to the country’s well being such as rising unemployment, economic malaise, attracting investments, crime-busting and others.  

They also want Malaysia to have a clear foreign policy that prioritises the country’s interest, instead of being servile to any superpowers. 

Just look at what is happening in Sri Lanka, which has declared bankruptcy. The youths are the ones who spearheaded the protests against their Government and calling for massive reforms to take place.   

The youngsters are unlikely to depend on the older generations to guide them to face the new challenges facing the world. These are the people who would rise in power later and influence the direction a country is taking.  

And this is the group Pakatan needs to endear itself to. They will decide on the coalition’s future and it would be wise for Pakatan’s leadership to provide them the platform to show their prowess, and groom them to become future leaders.  — April 19, 2022.  

Source:https://focusmalaysia.my/umno-digging-a-grave-for-pakatanwith-the-latter-providing-shovels-part-1/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.