Skip to main content

SECURITY MEASURES: Need to enhance our border security


SOVEREIGNTY of a country is the most important requirement for the existence of that country. A threat to the country's independence cannot be tolerated. The people must be united and support the measures taken by the authorities to quell the threat.

Sadly, some have failed to see the Lahad Datu incident as a national threat where the sovereignty of our country was being questioned by the armed intruders.

They tried to stake a claim on a state that was never theirs in the first place.
This is totally unacceptable. National security cannot be compromised for any reason. We have a duty to defend our country's borders.

The death of some members of the security forces in protecting our country's independence cannot be disparaged. They are the unsung heroes.

The use of Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma) and the creation of the Eastern Sabah Security Command (Esscom) are to prevent these intruders from further terrorising our people in Sabah.

Maritime security is the biggest security problem that we are facing now. This is because of our borders which extend from Perlis to Sabah.

This intrusion has highlighted to us the need for us to enhance our border security.

Before Esscom, we had Rajang Security Command (Rascom), which was set up by the National Security Council on March 25, 1972 (and dismantled on April 6, 1995) to combat the communist insurgency from the Northern Kalimantan People's Party (Paraku) in Sibu, Kapit, Sarikei, Mukah and central Sarawak.

Now, we have to create more security commands not only in Sabah and Sarawak, but in Peninsular Malaysia as well.

Prevention is always better than cure.

We need to take measures to enhance our intelligence to prevent further intrusion from foreign terrorists, insurgents or intruders so that our national security will not be jeopardized.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Two Tales, Two Leaders - PART 1

Man has dual nature; he is both his own person and a member of his country. On the one hand, the law must protect the individual from the injustices of the multitude.  History has shown how individuals fall prey to mass perversity, their crime being simply a refusal to conform to the beliefs and prejudices of the majority. Anwar Ibrahim, The Asian Renaissance, 1997., Page 63. The value system and ethical code therefore determine the success or failure of corrective measures. If the value system is wrong, corrective measures will not be productive or will be only slightly productive. When the value system motivates, very little corrective measures are needed. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, The Malay Dilemma, 1970., Pages 172-173. Introduction Malaysia is our motherland. We love our country. This country has so much of wealth. Even though, Malaysia has agonized considerably in past three decades because of the malpractices of the corrupted characters but she is never fail t...

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.