Skip to main content

As America pulls out of Yemen, ISIS and AQAP move in

By Alexis Knutsen

The United States began withdrawing its remaining personnel from Yemen Saturday, citing deteriorating security conditions. About 100 American troops, including the special operations forces assisting the Yemeni military in the fight against al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), were evacuated. The move diminishes America’s intelligence footprint in Yemen and abandons the country to AQAP, the Iranian-backed al Houthis, and, now, the Islamic State in Iraq and al Sham (ISIS). What does the Obama administration intend to do about the threat from Yemen? So far, not much.

Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Yemen, AQAP, is nowhere close to being defeated, and is, in fact, benefiting from Yemen’s chaos. Yemen has slowly collapsed into two rival governments – one in northern Yemen controlled by the Zaydi Shia rebel group known as the al Houthis, and the other in southern Yemen under former President Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi, whom the US still recognizes as Yemen’s president. As both the Hadi and al Houthi governments are drawn further into armed conflict, both sides will likely be less able to commit forces to fighting AQAP.  AQAP, furthermore, has also been able to embed its fighters within local populations opposed to the al Houthis, giving AQAP more operating room throughout the country.

ISIS is also opening a new Yemen front and is trying to stoke sectarian conflict. On March 20, ISIS supporters bombed two mosques in Sana’a frequented by al Houthis and attempted to bomb a mosque in the al Houthi stronghold of Sa’ada in north Yemen. The attack killed upwards of 140 and has already elicited a strong reaction from the al Houthis, who were the primary target. ISIS used a similar strategy of targeting Shia in 2006 to bring Iraq to full-scale sectarian conflict. While sectarianism is not traditionally strong in Yemen, Yemen is not immune to it either. Even a few attacks like this can fuel a sectarian conflict, potentially benefiting both ISIS and even AQAP.

So what’s the US to do? The withdrawal of our counter-terrorism forces severely limits what were already limited options. To start, the US and its Gulf partners should continue to make any efforts they can to get Hadi and the al Houthis to a negotiating table. We also need to answer what the state of the intelligence on Yemen is now and who we think our counter-terrorism partners should be.

A few things are certain – the Yemen conflict is going to get worse, AQAP and ISIS are going to benefit, and the US is going to be less safe because of it. Doing nothing is not an option.

Source: https://www.aei.org/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...
Post a Comment
Read more

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i...
Post a Comment
Read more

The by-election in Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) and the Indian electorate

  I was born in Malaysia, belonging to the Indian ethnic group, which constitutes approximately 7% of the country's total population. My durable credence is that I am Malaysian first and foremost, and only then do I identify myself as Indian. Regrettably, it saddens me to witness and hear about the actions of certain politicians who question my loyalty to Malaysia. What is even more disheartening is that some Malaysians have been influenced by the manipulative rhetoric of these self-serving politicians. Recently, I have observed numerous discussions on both mainstream and online news platforms regarding the recognition and inclusion of Indians by ruling parties. Surprisingly, even the opposition has displayed a significant interest in the welfare of Indians. Upon contemplating the reasons behind this sudden surge in attention towards Indians, it becomes evident that it is primarily driven by the upcoming Kuala Kubu Baharu (KKB) by-election. It is noteworthy that such ...
Post a Comment
Read more