Skip to main content

Are they insurgents, actually they are not. [updated]



The landing of insurgents with arms from Philippines to Sabah two weeks ago further affirmed my fear that the interest of national security is compromised to accommodate political means. These insurgents need to treat as invaders. They need to be captured and punished in accordance with law of our land.

If this ‘invasion’ had happened elsewhere they surely will faced severe consequences from the army and security forces from that countries. Here we isolated them. We, also negotiating with them and finding a solution to allow them return to their country amicably. That’s really surprise to me.

National security cannot be compromised for any reasons. The sovereignty of a country will be valued on how the security and enforcement agencies safeguarding the border of that country. That’s our highest responsibility to defense the independence of our nation. This reminds me of the Bay of Pigs invasion where the Cuban government had taken a military action to crash the invaders who happened to be their own Cuban dissidents.

These insurgents need to be treated as the invaders and an affirmative action need to be taken to tell to the whole world that the Malaysians will never relinquish their self-determining. We also will not allow aliens to conquer our blissful nation.


[Updated from earlier edition.]

comments:
Yesterday two of our hero had died and three others injured to protect and preserve our nation. my utmost respect for our national warriors.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.