Skip to main content

Cyberterrorism: Latest Threat to National Computer Security? Threat Is Real, but Often Exaggerated

By Amy Zalman, Ph.D.

The immediate aftermath of 9/11 produced several interrelated fears about the role that the Internet and networked computers might play in a terrorist attack. First, the government and the private sector worried that information housed on computers might be vulnerable. Those who seek to threaten American national security could do so if they obtained weapons system information or substantial financial information from banks.

A second, related concern, was that the networks over which this information is transmitted could be compromised. Their compromise would of course give the criminally-minded among us access to information, as well as the opportunity to influence or manipulate its flow.

Defining cyberterrorism has been a challenge. Cyberterrorism is not necessarily designed to cause a terrifying visual spectacle that can be exploited for propaganda purposes, as conventional terrorism is. Defining cyberterrorism as broadly as possible serves those who want to expand control over cyberspace. Even though only a small amount of cybercrime could actually be designated terrorism, the term 'cyberterrorism' creates a subliminal linkage in listener's minds to groups such as Al Qaeda and other global jihadists. The government and private industry can in turn use fears about Al Qaeda to create support for tighter controls on electronic information.

Cyberterrorism, Is it a Threat?

A number of experts conclude that while the threat of cyberterrorism does exist, it is routinely exaggerated by various actors for political, or financial gain). As they note, the United States (and indeed, much of the rest of the world) is profoundly dependent on computer networks for its daily well functioning. It is important to safeguard critical infrastructure from vulnerability to attack.
At the same time, maintaining a state of anxiety over that vulnerability can be profitable. As Gabriel Weimann pointed out in Cyberterrorism: How Real is the Threat? " …an entire industry has emerged to grapple with the threat of cyberterrorism … private companies have hastily deployed security consultants and software designed to protect public and private targets … the federal government requested $4.5 billion for infrastructure security [following 9/11], and the FBI now boasts more than one thousand "cyber investigators."

U.S. National Computer Security Efforts


The Patriot Act Addresses cyberterrorism: The Bush Administration has offered to counter the threat of cyberterrorism by expanding the punishments for those committing cybercrimes, and pushing for Internet Service Providers to disclose information to the government for investigations. Both of these provisions appear in the US Patriot Act (the 2001 Act was updated in 2005). According to a White House press release, the act also usefully "allows Internet providers, without fear of being sued, to give information to law enforcement when it would help law enforcement prevent a threat of death or serious injury." However, a September, 2007 ruling by Manhattan federal judge Victor Marrero on the constitutionality of National Security Letters (NSLs) Challenges the Patriot Act provision.

The Patriot Act allowed the government to issue NSLs requesting customer information without legal approval to a company, and also put 'gag orders' on companies over their ability to disclose their receipt of these letters. Following an ACLU lawsuit brought on behalf of an Internet company (which remains anonymous), Judge Marrero ruled the gag order violates the first amendment right to free speech, and the lack of judicial oversight violates the fourth amendment prohibition of "unreasonable search and seizure."

New offices address cyberterrorism: The Department of Homeland Security houses a National Cyber Security Division which aims to build a national cyberspace response system, and to put into use a cyber-risk management program to protect critical infrastructure.

Additionally, the Air Force has established a provisional Cyber Command, which will coordinate with air and space operations to conduct wars in cyberspace.

Source:  http://terrorism.about.com/od/issuestrends/a/Cyberterrorism.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.