Skip to main content

Malaysia: SOSMA terrorist suspects are released by the court

Today a man named in 9/11 Commission Report who is detained with another two suspects are released by a Malaysian court today.

Yazid Sufaat previously detained by the Malaysian authority under Internal Security Act now defunct legislation and later was released by them when they convinced that he was fully rehabilitated. 

Unfortunately, he and two other were detained in February this year on the suspicious that he may involved with terrorist related activities.  

They are detained under SOSMA, the newly enacted legislation which oversees terrorism in Malaysia to the surprise of many people.

Now they are released by the court.

With current turmoil on electoral fraud claims by the opposition through the demonstrations, the timing of release of these detainees has created some cause of anxieties among security analysts.

National security is paramount. No one is above the law. Law need to be respected and followed. 

Then, again, a terrorist is a terrorist always. A hardcore terrorist in my opinion can not be rehabilitated. There is no way to guarantee that they will not go to the terrorist path again.

We have many living examples for the above mentioned statement.

Therefore the intelligence and enforcement agencies in Malaysia must be vigilant and take serious measures to contain any threats from these people.

Again, national security can be compromised for any one. National sovereignty with peace and security are the important pillars as an independent nation. We as the people have huge responsibilities to hold on these pillars.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the FĂȘte de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.