Skip to main content

Malaysia’s Strategic Opportunity in the US-China Trade War

Introduction

In the contemporary global trade environment, the intensifying trade conflict between the United States and China has resulted in considerable economic upheaval.

However, amidst this volatility, countries such as Malaysia are discovering avenues to strategically reposition themselves.

The forthcoming visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping to Malaysia from April 15 to 17, 2025, coinciding with the ongoing economic pressures from US-imposed tariffs on China, represents a notable geopolitical development.

This article examines how Malaysia can leverage this opportunity to enhance its economic objectives, take advantage of exemptions within the US tariff framework, and reinforce its claims and sovereignty over its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the South China Sea.

Economic Realignment and Malaysia’s Advantage

The recent escalation of the US-China trade conflict, characterized by President Donald Trump’s implementation of tariffs reaching as high as 125% on Chinese imports, has led China to pursue enhanced relationships with alternative trading partners, especially in Southeast Asia.

Malaysia, recognized as the third-largest economy within ASEAN and set to assume the rotating chair of the regional organization in 2025, is positioned at the forefront of this geopolitical shift.

In contrast to China, Malaysia faces a significantly lower US tariff rate of 24%, which is relatively modest, along with temporary exemptions granted to other countries that further enhance its attractiveness as a trade partner.

With the US suspending reciprocal tariffs for nations outside of China, Malaysia has the potential to serve as a strategic channel for Chinese firms aiming to navigate American tariffs by redirecting their supply chains and production processes.

By positioning itself as a pivotal hub for investment, assembly, and export activities, Malaysia can draw considerable foreign direct investment (FDI), particularly in high-value industries such as electronics, automotive components, and green technology.

This strategic realignment is further supported by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s active diplomatic efforts.

By convening a special ASEAN meeting on April 10 to address regional strategies in response to US tariffs, Malaysia is demonstrating leadership at a critical moment.

As China looks to broaden its economic alliances, Malaysia’s diplomatic and economic receptiveness presents a favourable alternative for Beijing, while simultaneously enabling Kuala Lumpur to negotiate from a position of enhanced leverage.

Exploiting the China Exception in US Tariffs

President Trump's choice to exclude China from the temporary tariff suspension, while maintaining and even raising punitive tariffs to 125%, presents a distinctive opportunity for Malaysia.

This "China exception" prompts Chinese companies to seek alternatives, particularly in Southeast Asia, for trade and production avenues.

Malaysia stands to gain by establishing itself as a manufacturing and export hub for Chinese products destined for the United States and other international markets.

With its existing infrastructure, favourable business climate, and strategic trade agreements, Malaysia can offer Chinese enterprises a cost-efficient and politically stable alternative to their operations in China.

Collaborative ventures, licensing agreements, and transshipment strategies could serve as mechanisms to redirect goods through Malaysia, enabling Chinese firms to mitigate their tariff liabilities while simultaneously enhancing Malaysia's export capabilities and industrial strength.

Moreover, Malaysia's participation in significant trade agreements like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) provides additional regional advantages for both Chinese and Malaysian businesses.

By boosting trade volumes and fostering economic interdependence with China, Malaysia can fortify its role in regional value chains, which may lead to job creation, infrastructure advancements, and technology transfer.

Reasserting Sovereignty Over the South China Sea

In addition to economic considerations, Malaysia should seize the current opportunity to tackle enduring maritime disputes in the South China Sea.

China's extensive territorial claims and militarization efforts have often infringed upon Malaysia's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), especially in the resource-abundant waters near Sabah and Sarawak.

President Xi's visit presents a chance for Malaysia to diplomatically reaffirm its maritime sovereignty.

As China seeks to repair economic relations in the region, Malaysia can link the enhancement of trade ties to a commitment to uphold international maritime law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

Although Malaysia lacks the military capability to challenge China's naval dominance directly, it can utilize economic discussions and the solidarity of ASEAN to reinforce its territorial claims.

In its role as chair of ASEAN, Malaysia is well-positioned to advocate for a unified regional approach regarding the South China Sea.

By fostering coordinated diplomatic efforts, supported by economic collaboration, Southeast Asia can effectively counterbalance China's influence without resorting to direct conflict.

Furthermore, Malaysia can promote enhanced surveillance and collaborative naval patrols with ASEAN partners and external allies such as Japan and Australia, thereby strengthening its presence in contested regions.

Conclusion

Malaysia finds itself at a crucial crossroads in the context of a global trade conflict that has significantly altered traditional alliances and supply chains.

This situation presents a unique opportunity for Malaysia, particularly in light of Xi Jinping’s recent visit and the strategic implications of U.S. tariff policies.

By leveraging these developments, Malaysia has the potential to strengthen its economy, attract redirected investments from China, and enhance its maritime sovereignty in the South China Sea.

However, the primary challenge lies in striking a balance between economic engagement and the preservation of national interests.

To navigate this opportunity effectively, Malaysia must adopt a pragmatic approach to diplomacy, particularly by utilizing its position as the chair of ASEAN to foster regional unity and economic resilience.

As the geopolitical landscape continues to shift, Malaysia has a distinctive chance to redefine its role, not merely as a passive participant but as an active architect of its own future within the broader Indo-Pacific region.

10.4.2025

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

© Copyright is reserved.

Source: https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/739829

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives. The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals. Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors. Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare. The 9/11 attacks The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the m...