Skip to main content

Are Racism and Discrimination the Roots of Terrorism?

Terrorism is not born in a vacuum. Behind every act of ideological violence lies a history of grievance, social injustice, and identity politics.

While the world often focuses on religion or geopolitical strife as the root causes of terrorism, a more insidious and deeply embedded trigger is often overlooked: racism and discrimination.

These factors, when left unaddressed, do not just isolate communities they push individuals to the edge, where violence becomes a form of expression. This is especially dangerous when such sentiments are stoked deliberately by those in power.

In Malaysia, the issue of "2R" i.e. race and religion has become increasingly volatile. Some politicians and hate preachers have, at times, exploited these identities to rally support, marginalise minorities, and sow distrust.

In a multiracial country where national unity is always a work in progress, such tactics can have disastrous long-term consequences.

When race and religion are weaponised for political gain, they do more than divide they radicalise.

The 2R Politics and Social Polarisation

In recent years, several Malaysian politicians have openly engaged in racially charged rhetoric, often portraying the majority group as under threat, or blaming minorities for economic and cultural decline.

Simultaneously, certain preachers have disseminated sermons portraying other religions and races as inferior, untrustworthy, or even enemies of the faith.

This rhetoric does more than just poison the national discourse it normalises racism and religious supremacy, especially among youth who are searching for identity and belonging.

This is particularly dangerous in online spaces, where echo chambers amplify hate speech and conspiracy theories.

When combined with frustrations over unemployment, disenfranchisement, or lack of direction, young people can become radicalised not necessarily into international terrorist networks like ISIS or al-Qaeda, but into violent ethnonationalist or supremacist ideologies.

Racism as Radicalisation: Lessons from Abroad

The Christchurch Mosque shooting in New Zealand (2019), where a white supremacist murdered 51 Muslims during prayer, was driven by a theory of racial replacement a belief that immigrants were eroding white identity. Similar motives drove the Buffalo supermarket shooting (2022) and the Norwegian mass killings by Anders Breivik.

In these cases, terrorism was not imported from foreign ideologies it was homegrown, fuelled by racism, fear, and false narratives of victimhood.

Malaysia is not immune. The temple riots in Subang Jaya, the racial clashes of past decades, and hate-filled ‘ceramahs’ by religious figures all demonstrate that we, too, have a volatile undercurrent of racial tension.

While Malaysia has not experienced large-scale domestic terrorism linked to 2R rhetoric, the conditions that foster such extremism are not foreign to us.

When Discrimination Breeds Desperation

Globally, marginalised groups often face daily humiliation and structural exclusion, which can turn simmering resentment into rage.

In France, the Muslim communities of North African descent living in suburban banlieues are frequently subjected to aggressive policing and social exclusion.

Many of the Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan attackers were second-generation citizens who grew up feeling alienated from French society. Radicalisation, in these cases, was born out of racism and rejection.

Likewise, in Myanmar, decades of ethnic discrimination and state-sponsored racism against the Rohingya Muslims culminated in the rise of militant groups like the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA).

Though these groups never reached the scale of global jihadist movements, their emergence shows how persistent racial oppression can transform victims into armed actors.

Even Sri Lanka’s Tamil Tigers (LTTE) were not born of ideology alone but of prolonged marginalisation by a Sinhalese-majority state. Racism and exclusion, when institutionalised, become breeding grounds for extremism.

Malaysia’s 2R Dilemma: A Preventable Crisis

The Malaysian government has rightly taken steps to curb religious and racial extremism, such as prosecuting those who incite hatred under laws like the Sedition Act and Section 298A of the Penal Code.

However, legal deterrents alone are not enough. What is urgently needed is a political and social commitment to dismantle the structures that enable racism and discrimination to flourish including among political elites.

When some national leaders engage in dog-whistle politics, suggesting that certain communities are “pendatang” (outsiders) or that others are undermining Islam, they plant seeds of distrust.

When some preachers claim superiority of one race or religion over another, they create an atmosphere where violence seems justifiable to those on the fringes.

Left unchecked, such rhetoric becomes normalised in schools, workplaces, and even state institutions.

Youth who grow up in this environment may begin to see other Malaysians not as equals, but as threats.

This is how radicalisation begins not with a bomb or a gun, but with a word, a sermon, a campaign speech.

Countering Racism to Prevent Extremism

In order to combat terrorism effectively, it is essential to address the underlying conditions that facilitate its proliferation.

This necessitates a comprehensive approach that includes educational reforms aimed at fostering critical thinking, civic responsibility, and mutual respect among diverse racial and religious groups.

Furthermore, there must be a commitment to media accountability to prevent the amplification or legitimization of hate speech.

Political leaders should be held accountable for their actions, particularly those who exploit racial and religious divisions for personal gain.

Additionally, community engagement initiatives that encourage intercultural dialogue are vital in preventing radicalization at the grassroots level. Malaysia's diverse population should be viewed as a source of strength rather than a vulnerability to be manipulated for power.

Failing to address the impact of racism and discrimination on the rise of extremism could lead to a generation of Malaysians who are increasingly divided, filled with animosity, and susceptible to violence.

Racism and discrimination are not merely social ills they are national security threats.

When embedded in the rhetoric of politicians and preachers, they do more than offend they radicalise.

Malaysia must take a long, hard look at how the “2R” issues are being weaponised, especially in our political landscape.

Because the true danger is not just in the loud extremists, but in the quiet normalisation of hate that makes terrorism seem, to some, like justice.

01.05.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© All rights are reserved.

Published at: https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/743140

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives. The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals. Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors. Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare. The 9/11 attacks The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the m...