Skip to main content

Operation Sindoor and the New Face of India’s Military Posture - Part 1

In the early hours of May 7, 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor, its most extensive cross-border military action since the 2019 Balakot airstrikes.

The operation targeted nine terror camps located in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoK), serving as a direct response to the horrific Pahalgam terrorist attack on April 22.

Carefully planned and precisely executed, the mission marked a major shift in India’s counter-terrorism strategy exposing critical weaknesses in Pakistan’s defence systems while showcasing the growing sophistication and restraint of India’s military approach.

A Strategy That Took Pakistan by Surprise

India's operational strategy for Operation Sindoor was founded on three key principles: precision, restraint, and psychological impact.

In contrast to earlier retaliatory actions, Operation Sindoor was deliberately designed to prevent escalation while effectively conveying a strong deterrent message.

Indian authorities highlighted that the operation was 'focused, measured, and non-escalatory', deliberately steering clear of Pakistani military targets.

However, this very restraint served as a potent psychological tool. The operation's pre-dawn execution exploited vulnerabilities in Pakistan's nighttime airspace surveillance and response capabilities, thereby catching its defences unprepared.

Despite being in a constant state of high alert due to its tense relationship with India, Pakistan's air defence systems were completely taken by surprise, failing to identify or counter the precision strikes.

This indicates a significant deficiency in radar surveillance capabilities, insufficient readiness for nighttime operations, or a successful Indian electronic warfare initiative that concealed the strike package.

If India's standoff missiles were indeed launched from within its own airspace, as asserted, this not only demonstrates operational audacity but also reflects a substantial level of confidence in India's long-range precision munitions, satellite intelligence, and airspace mapping technologies.

Pakistan’s Air Defence: A Systemic Failure

The fact that nine high-value terror-linked sites including notorious camps in Muridke, Kotli, Sialkot, and Muzaffarabad were hit without Pakistani retaliation or interception is telling.

This expose glaring inefficiencies in Pakistan’s integrated air defence system (IADS).

Despite years of investment in layered defences comprising Chinese-origin HQ-9 systems, Swedish surveillance radars, and a modernized F-16 fleet Pakistan failed to provide early warning or mount even a symbolic deterrent.

India, by contrast, appears to have exploited radar blind spots, and possibly used terrain-hugging missiles and stealth technology to evade detection.

This mirrors the weaknesses seen during the 2019 Balakot strikes, but on a more embarrassing scale for Islamabad.

The failure will undoubtedly trigger internal reviews, but the damage to Pakistan’s deterrent credibility particularly in the eyes of its own population and allies is already done.

Superiority of Indian Military Equipment and Doctrine

The operational success of Operation Sindoor underscores the growing edge India holds in stand-off precision strike capabilities.

While details remain classified, it is likely that India used a mix of indigenous and imported weaponry possibly the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile or indigenous smart glide bombs.

Equally notable is the doctrinal shift. India no longer appears content with symbolic retaliation.

Instead, its strategy now integrates as multi-domain planning (airspace, cyber, and space-based ISR), Tight political-military coordination, and most crucially, non-escalatory but effective deterrence.

This blend of military maturity and restraint has allowed India to conduct deep-precision strikes while avoiding overt war escalation a feat that many democracies struggle to balance.

International Optics and Regional Ramifications

Globally, Operation Sindoor has attracted calls for restraint but not outright condemnation marking a shift from earlier years when Indian actions often drew criticism.

This indicates a growing international recognition of India’s right to self-defence, especially when faced with state-abetted cross-border terrorism.

However, this operation also sharpens the stakes. Pakistan has vowed to respond "at a time and place of its choosing," and the presence of civilian casualties if confirmed, especially at a mosque in Punjab could trigger domestic outrage and pressure on the Pakistani military to retaliate.

This could create a volatile tit-for-tat spiral if not diplomatically managed.

A New Paradigm of Deterrence

Operation Sindoor is far more than a reactive military strike it marks a decisive shift in India’s counter-terrorism and defence doctrine.

By opting for precision-guided attacks on terror infrastructure, rather than broad-based aggression, India has showcased a doctrine centred on technological edge, strategic restraint, and operational discipline.

This evolution reflects New Delhi’s intent to deter future attacks through carefully calculated, high-impact responses that avoid escalation while still achieving their objectives.

For Pakistan, the operation serves as a clear wake-up call. Its long-standing dependence on non-state actors as proxies, combined with aging defence systems and reactive intelligence infrastructure, has left it vulnerable to modern, network-centric warfare.

The failure to anticipate or counter India’s strike has not only exposed gaps in its national security apparatus but also dented its deterrent credibility, both domestically and internationally.

India, meanwhile, must remain vigilant. While it has scored a tactical and psychological victory, it must prepare for asymmetric retaliation or covert responses.

Diplomatically, India must continue to engage global partners to maintain international support and prevent misinterpretations of its actions.

For now, however, Operation Sindoor sends a powerful message: India is capable of delivering justice through precision, while maintaining strategic balance and regional stability.


07.05.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© All rights are reserved.

Published - https://focusmalaysia.my/operation-sindoor-and-the-new-face-of-indias-military-posture/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Trump's role in the Israel-Hamas ceasefire

As the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, scheduled to commence on Jan 19, 2025, approaches, it is essential to examine the potential impact of president-elect Donald Trump on this event and Middle East security. Considering Trump’s past foreign policy actions, especially those concerning Israel, alongside the wider geopolitical environment, his prospective role in shaping the ceasefire and future peace initiatives is intricate and layered. Historical influence Trump’s initial term as president was characterised by a robust endorsement of Israel, a position that resonated with his domestic political supporters and simultaneously altered US foreign policy, thereby impacting the wider dynamics of the Middle East. Key actions during this period included the formal acknowledgement of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the transfer of the US embassy to that city, and the withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement. These measures solidified his rapport with Israeli leadership and exemplified his ...