Skip to main content

Operation Sindoor and the New Face of India’s Military Posture - Part 1

In the early hours of May 7, 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor, its most extensive cross-border military action since the 2019 Balakot airstrikes.

The operation targeted nine terror camps located in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoK), serving as a direct response to the horrific Pahalgam terrorist attack on April 22.

Carefully planned and precisely executed, the mission marked a major shift in India’s counter-terrorism strategy exposing critical weaknesses in Pakistan’s defence systems while showcasing the growing sophistication and restraint of India’s military approach.

A Strategy That Took Pakistan by Surprise

India's operational strategy for Operation Sindoor was founded on three key principles: precision, restraint, and psychological impact.

In contrast to earlier retaliatory actions, Operation Sindoor was deliberately designed to prevent escalation while effectively conveying a strong deterrent message.

Indian authorities highlighted that the operation was 'focused, measured, and non-escalatory', deliberately steering clear of Pakistani military targets.

However, this very restraint served as a potent psychological tool. The operation's pre-dawn execution exploited vulnerabilities in Pakistan's nighttime airspace surveillance and response capabilities, thereby catching its defences unprepared.

Despite being in a constant state of high alert due to its tense relationship with India, Pakistan's air defence systems were completely taken by surprise, failing to identify or counter the precision strikes.

This indicates a significant deficiency in radar surveillance capabilities, insufficient readiness for nighttime operations, or a successful Indian electronic warfare initiative that concealed the strike package.

If India's standoff missiles were indeed launched from within its own airspace, as asserted, this not only demonstrates operational audacity but also reflects a substantial level of confidence in India's long-range precision munitions, satellite intelligence, and airspace mapping technologies.

Pakistan’s Air Defence: A Systemic Failure

The fact that nine high-value terror-linked sites including notorious camps in Muridke, Kotli, Sialkot, and Muzaffarabad were hit without Pakistani retaliation or interception is telling.

This expose glaring inefficiencies in Pakistan’s integrated air defence system (IADS).

Despite years of investment in layered defences comprising Chinese-origin HQ-9 systems, Swedish surveillance radars, and a modernized F-16 fleet Pakistan failed to provide early warning or mount even a symbolic deterrent.

India, by contrast, appears to have exploited radar blind spots, and possibly used terrain-hugging missiles and stealth technology to evade detection.

This mirrors the weaknesses seen during the 2019 Balakot strikes, but on a more embarrassing scale for Islamabad.

The failure will undoubtedly trigger internal reviews, but the damage to Pakistan’s deterrent credibility particularly in the eyes of its own population and allies is already done.

Superiority of Indian Military Equipment and Doctrine

The operational success of Operation Sindoor underscores the growing edge India holds in stand-off precision strike capabilities.

While details remain classified, it is likely that India used a mix of indigenous and imported weaponry possibly the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile or indigenous smart glide bombs.

Equally notable is the doctrinal shift. India no longer appears content with symbolic retaliation.

Instead, its strategy now integrates as multi-domain planning (airspace, cyber, and space-based ISR), Tight political-military coordination, and most crucially, non-escalatory but effective deterrence.

This blend of military maturity and restraint has allowed India to conduct deep-precision strikes while avoiding overt war escalation a feat that many democracies struggle to balance.

International Optics and Regional Ramifications

Globally, Operation Sindoor has attracted calls for restraint but not outright condemnation marking a shift from earlier years when Indian actions often drew criticism.

This indicates a growing international recognition of India’s right to self-defence, especially when faced with state-abetted cross-border terrorism.

However, this operation also sharpens the stakes. Pakistan has vowed to respond "at a time and place of its choosing," and the presence of civilian casualties if confirmed, especially at a mosque in Punjab could trigger domestic outrage and pressure on the Pakistani military to retaliate.

This could create a volatile tit-for-tat spiral if not diplomatically managed.

A New Paradigm of Deterrence

Operation Sindoor is far more than a reactive military strike it marks a decisive shift in India’s counter-terrorism and defence doctrine.

By opting for precision-guided attacks on terror infrastructure, rather than broad-based aggression, India has showcased a doctrine centred on technological edge, strategic restraint, and operational discipline.

This evolution reflects New Delhi’s intent to deter future attacks through carefully calculated, high-impact responses that avoid escalation while still achieving their objectives.

For Pakistan, the operation serves as a clear wake-up call. Its long-standing dependence on non-state actors as proxies, combined with aging defence systems and reactive intelligence infrastructure, has left it vulnerable to modern, network-centric warfare.

The failure to anticipate or counter India’s strike has not only exposed gaps in its national security apparatus but also dented its deterrent credibility, both domestically and internationally.

India, meanwhile, must remain vigilant. While it has scored a tactical and psychological victory, it must prepare for asymmetric retaliation or covert responses.

Diplomatically, India must continue to engage global partners to maintain international support and prevent misinterpretations of its actions.

For now, however, Operation Sindoor sends a powerful message: India is capable of delivering justice through precision, while maintaining strategic balance and regional stability.


07.05.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© All rights are reserved.

Published - https://focusmalaysia.my/operation-sindoor-and-the-new-face-of-indias-military-posture/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.