Skip to main content

Lessons from Operation Sindoor - Part 2

In the pre-dawn darkness of May 7, 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor, a highly calculated and precision-targeted military response against nine terror camps located in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoK).

The strikes came just two weeks after the Pahalgam massacre, where 26 civilians including foreign nationals were gunned down in an attack India attributes to Pakistan-backed terror outfits.

While the operation was intense in execution, it was also marked by its restraint and clarity. India deliberately avoided full-blown war, directing its firepower solely at terrorist infrastructure, not Pakistani military installations or civilian areas.

For a country like Malaysia, which maintains a posture of strategic neutrality and internal stability in a complex region, Operation Sindoor offers significant lessons in deterrence, precision warfare, and national defence preparedness.

Precision Over Provocation

India's reaction was not a hasty act of vengeance; rather, it represented a measured exhibition of technological prowess and strategic sophistication.

Conducted between 1:05 AM and 1:30 AM, the operations reportedly employed long-range precision-guided munitions, likely including advanced cruise missiles such as BrahMos and smart glide bombs, launched from within Indian airspace.

Intelligence was acquired through satellite monitoring, drone surveillance, and advanced ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) systems, facilitating precise targeting of terrorist camps while reducing collateral damage.

This marks a notable doctrinal evolution for India.

Previously, the subcontinent was a potential site for rapid escalation; however, India has now adopted a model of 'deterrence by precision' that punishes wrongdoers without provoking open conflict.

This strategic retaliation framework is one that Malaysia should examine closely, particularly in the context of regional threats posed by piracy, extremist networks, and cross-border militant activities in Southeast Asia.

Why India Struck: Pakistan’s Complicity and Inaction

The primary impetus for Operation Sindoor stems from a persistent challenge: Pakistan's inability to dismantle terrorist organizations operating within its territory.

Groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad, which have been linked to incidents like the 2008 Mumbai attacks and numerous killings related to Kashmir, continue to find refuge in Pakistan.

Training camps located in areas such as Muridke, Sialkot, and Kotli are well-documented yet seldom disrupted by Pakistani authorities. India has consistently issued diplomatic warnings and provided intelligence.

However, following Pakistan's inaction after the widely condemned Pahalgam attack, which resulted in the deaths of civilians, including a naval officer, a child, and foreign tourists, India determined that military deterrence was the only feasible course of action.

For Malaysia, the implications are significant: a country that neglects to address internal threats or permits transnational terrorist organizations to utilize its territory jeopardizes its international credibility and invites strategic retaliation. Inaction may be perceived as complicity, undermining a nation's standing on the global stage.

Pakistan’s Intelligence and Defence Failure

A particularly notable feature of Operation Sindoor is Pakistan's inability to detect or foresee the strike, despite maintaining military readiness along the Line of Control for years and a history of Indian retaliatory measures following terrorist incidents.

This failure can be attributed to several factors, including an excessive dependence on conventional radar and surveillance systems that inadequately identify terrain-hugging or stealth-capable munitions, intelligence shortcomings in monitoring Indian military movements or intercepting critical communications, and strategic miscalculations that led to the assumption that India would opt for political denunciation rather than military action.

The failure of early-warning systems is a matter of concern for any nation with a vulnerable defence perimeter.

Malaysia, situated near vital maritime routes and regions experiencing sporadic insurgency, must prioritize the integration, modernization, and real-time threat detection capabilities of its defense systems, particularly in maritime and aerial contexts.

India’s Communication Strategy

India’s strategic communication following the strikes was another lesson in modern conflict management. Military briefings led by Wing Commander Vyomika Singh and Colonel Sophiya Qureshi laid out the objectives, targets, and rationale for the strike with maps, footage, and technical detail.

India emphasized that no civilian or military Pakistani targets were struck, reinforcing the image of a restrained yet powerful actor on the global stage.

Malaysia should note that crisis communication is as crucial as the operation itself. In moments of conflict or terror response, clarity of intent, transparency of action, and consistent messaging can prevent misinformation, maintain domestic unity, and ensure international understanding.

Diplomacy in the Aftermath

Despite the surgical intensity of the operation, India has shown no desire to escalate further. It stated clearly that the strikes were over, had achieved their objective, and were meant as a direct response to terrorism not a declaration of war.

This positioning allowed India to withstand international scrutiny while also forcing Pakistan into a diplomatically defensive posture.

In the context of Malaysia, the key insight is that military intervention does not necessarily preclude diplomatic efforts, as long as such actions are grounded in international law and considerations of national security.

A strategic approach that harmonizes deterrence with restraint not only enhances national defence but also upholds regional credibility.

Operation Sindoor marks a new chapter in India’s military doctrine: one that fuses precision, political clarity, and strategic timing.

For Malaysia, which aspires to remain both peaceful and prepared in a region of growing complexity, India’s approach offers a crucial case study.

The future of warfare may no longer be about prolonged conflict it may instead be about speed, accuracy, and moral legitimacy.

Malaysia must ensure that its military, intelligence, and policy frameworks evolve accordingly, lest it be caught off guard by threats it didn’t see coming, or worse, failed to prepare for.


07.05.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© All rights are reserved.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.

Brexit: A lesson for Malaysians

Yesterday, Britons through a referendum made a decision to leave European Union. The ruling Conservative Party divided on this referendum and David Cameron in favour of ‘Remain’ was defeated outright. Even though he is disagreed with the decision of Britons, he announced that he is resigning from his premiership in respect of people’s decision. We can expect in a mature democracy country like United Kingdom this is vastly anticipated to be transpired.   A few days ago, the current Chief Commissioner of Malaysian Anti-Corruption of Commission made a statement that he is stepping down from his position and there are some rumours indicating that a few prominent officers from the said Commission will either resign or retire. It’s very eccentric news for Malaysians as it will have a profound impact on bribery and corruption issues in Malaysia as a whole. Recently, the results of two by elections were won by Barisan Nasional, the ruling party of Malaysia. Many promises had been...

Trump's role in the Israel-Hamas ceasefire

As the Israel-Hamas ceasefire, scheduled to commence on Jan 19, 2025, approaches, it is essential to examine the potential impact of president-elect Donald Trump on this event and Middle East security. Considering Trump’s past foreign policy actions, especially those concerning Israel, alongside the wider geopolitical environment, his prospective role in shaping the ceasefire and future peace initiatives is intricate and layered. Historical influence Trump’s initial term as president was characterised by a robust endorsement of Israel, a position that resonated with his domestic political supporters and simultaneously altered US foreign policy, thereby impacting the wider dynamics of the Middle East. Key actions during this period included the formal acknowledgement of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the transfer of the US embassy to that city, and the withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement. These measures solidified his rapport with Israeli leadership and exemplified his ...