Skip to main content

The Doctrine of Sindoor: India’s Red Line Against Terror

On the evening of May 10, a hush fell over the battlefield. For the first time in almost a week, the borders between India and Pakistan experienced a semblance of tranquillity, following one of the most intense and devastating confrontations in recent memory.

Operation Sindoor, India's bold and precise military response targeting terrorist strongholds in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), signifies a pivotal moment in the evolving security strategy of the subcontinent.

Although hostilities have ceased, a new strategic framework for India has emerged, one that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has articulated with both clarity and decisiveness. It is imperative to formally recognize this new doctrine as The Doctrine of Sindoor.

A Red Line Reimagined

Codenamed Operation Sindoor, which symbolically invokes the sacred red mark representing dignity and honour for Indian women, was a direct military response to the terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22.

Within a fortnight, India executed a coordinated strike on May 7, targeting locations described by PM Modi as 'global universities of terrorism' in Bahawalpur and Muridke.

Reports indicated that over 100 terrorists were neutralized. This led to a near-war scenario, with both nations engaged in a perilous missile and drone confrontation.

The escalation was alarming; however, the subsequent request for a ceasefire from Pakistan just 100 hours later validated India's objective of establishing deterrence through decisive retaliation.

The Three Pillars of the Doctrine of Sindoor

Central to this doctrine is a transformative triad, as articulated by Prime Minister Modi and emphasized by the Indian Director General of Military Operations, which signifies a strategic evolution in India's approach to addressing terrorism and threats sponsored by states.

Decisive Retaliation at a Time and Place of India's Choosing

India will no longer adhere to a reactive or defensive posture. As PM Modi stated, terrorist attacks on Indian soil will invite direct action against their origins.

No longer will geography or political pressure dictate India's hand; retaliation will be swift, coordinated, and tailored on India’s terms.

Rejecting the Specter of Nuclear Blackmail

The second pillar dismantles a long-standing psychological barrier the fear of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. India’s leadership has made it clear that nuclear threats will not deter military action against terrorist infrastructure.

As Modi asserted, "Any terrorist safe haven operating under the assurance of nuclear blackmail will face precise and decisive strikes."

This is a bold and calculated declaration, signalling India’s readiness to call Pakistan’s bluff.

 

Equating Terrorist Groups with Their Patron States

The third tenet of the Doctrine of Sindoor erases the artificial distinction between terrorist actors and the governments that shelter them.

"Terror and state cannot be separated when states line up to bury terrorists with honours," Modi pointed out.

This perspective calls for a global re-evaluation of how Pakistan is dealt with diplomatically not as a victim of terrorism, but as its enabler.

Symbolism and Strategic Clarity

The designation of Operation Sindoor is imbued with intentional cultural and emotional significance.

Modi's statement, 'Terrorists erased our women's Sindoor, we dismantled their stronghold,' conveys not only a sense of retribution but also the restoration of national dignity.

It resonates with a shared historical trauma, recalling events from Pulwama to Uri, and recontextualizes India's counter-terrorism strategy in a manner that is both tactical and symbolic.

Furthermore, this operation highlighted the advancement of India's military-industrial sector.

PM Modi underscored the achievements of 'Made in India' defence technologies, illustrating the capabilities of domestic missiles and drones.

This initiative transcends mere military pride; it represents India's aspiration to reshape 21st-century warfare through self-sufficiency and innovation.

A Diplomatic Challenge for the World

In Modi's own words: “Terror and talk cannot go together, terror and trade cannot happen together, and water and blood also cannot flow together.”

These aren’t rhetorical flourishes they form the boundaries of India's future diplomatic engagement with Pakistan.

The message to the international community is unambiguous: India’s willingness to engage in dialogue is now strictly conditional on verifiable action against terrorism.

By declaring that any future talks will be solely about terrorism and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, India has narrowed the field of diplomacy with a surgical precision matching its military strikes.

The New Normal

The Doctrine of Sindoor transcends mere retribution; it seeks to reformulate deterrence theory within the subcontinent.

This approach advocates for a shift from a reactive to a proactive posture, transitioning from diplomatic appeals to military enforcement, and from mere symbolic outrage to tangible repercussions.

Detractors may contend that such assertiveness could exacerbate instability. However, this perspective presupposes that the existing conditions were stable from the outset.

Operation Sindoor has effectively introduced a level of unpredictability not regarding India's vulnerabilities, but concerning its responses.

For the first time in many years, the repercussions of supporting terrorism against India have escalated to a perilously high level for Pakistan.

From Balakot to Sindoor

Since the Balakot air strikes in 2019 and leading up to Operation Sindoor in 2025, India has shifted from a stance of strategic patience to one of proactive engagement.

The Doctrine of Sindoor transcends a mere military strategy; it embodies a national doctrine focused on deterrence, dignity, and decisiveness.

The effectiveness of this doctrine in preventing future attacks or instigating a fundamental change in Pakistan's approach to terrorism is yet to be determined.

However, it is evident that a clear boundary has been established, symbolized by the colour of Sindoor.

13.5.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© All rights are reserved.

Published at https://focusmalaysia.my/the-doctrine-of-sindoor-indias-red-line-against-terror/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India-Malaysia ties and the future

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is on his first official visit to India. The main aim of this visit is to seek support for Malaysia’s application to join Brics and to fortify bilateral ties, as the country is keen to improve its connections with one of the rapidly expanding economies in Asia. In light of the increasing crumbling of the global order, particularly stemming from trade disputes between the United States and China, as well as the proxy conflict involving the United States and Russia, Malaysia is encouraged to reassess its foreign policy to uphold its neutral stance. Given India’s status as the largest democracy and the fifth-largest economy globally, along with its notable advancements in indigenous space and defence technologies, it is proposed that India emerge as Malaysia’s key partner in the years ahead. Why India is important for Malaysia The historical ties between India and Malaysia extend back several centuries, with significant Indian cultural, religious, and administ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ties that bind religion, state: Beneficial or detrimental?

Malaysia is characterised as a secular state, a principle reflecting its founding fathers’ vision. However, over the years, certain politicians from various factions have exploited religion as a potent tool to garner public support and to suppress or eliminate their political adversaries. The slogan “untuk agama, bangsa dan negara,” which translates to “for religion, race, and nation,” suggests a troubling prioritisation of religious matters over state affairs. This shift in focus by the past and present governments, which places religious issues above national interests, poses significant risks to the future stability and unity of the nation. Furthermore, the investigation into Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings, which is accused of child sexual abuse and forced labour, highlights the potential dangers of intertwining religious motivations with operational practices. Also, an examination of the present state of our government reveals a trajectory similar to that of Pakistan,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding terrorism and attacks in Lebanon

Terrorism is characterised as the illegal application of force and intimidation, particularly targeting civilians, to attain political objectives. The overarching definition of terrorism encompasses the strategic deployment of violence to instil widespread fear within a population, thus facilitating the realisation of political goals. Furthermore, the FBI differentiates between international terrorism, which involves violent actions perpetrated by individuals or groups motivated by foreign terrorist entities, and domestic terrorism, which refers to violent acts carried out by individuals or groups aiming to promote ideological objectives rooted in domestic factors. Additionally, it entails the employment of violence against non-combatants to fulfil political or ideological aspirations, frequently occurring during periods of peace or amid warfare. The 9/11 attacks The recent commemoration of the 9/11 attacks in the United States marked the anniversary of what is widely regarded as the m...
Post a Comment
Read more