Skip to main content

The Doctrine of Sindoor: India’s Red Line Against Terror

On the evening of May 10, a hush fell over the battlefield. For the first time in almost a week, the borders between India and Pakistan experienced a semblance of tranquillity, following one of the most intense and devastating confrontations in recent memory.

Operation Sindoor, India's bold and precise military response targeting terrorist strongholds in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), signifies a pivotal moment in the evolving security strategy of the subcontinent.

Although hostilities have ceased, a new strategic framework for India has emerged, one that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has articulated with both clarity and decisiveness. It is imperative to formally recognize this new doctrine as The Doctrine of Sindoor.

A Red Line Reimagined

Codenamed Operation Sindoor, which symbolically invokes the sacred red mark representing dignity and honour for Indian women, was a direct military response to the terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22.

Within a fortnight, India executed a coordinated strike on May 7, targeting locations described by PM Modi as 'global universities of terrorism' in Bahawalpur and Muridke.

Reports indicated that over 100 terrorists were neutralized. This led to a near-war scenario, with both nations engaged in a perilous missile and drone confrontation.

The escalation was alarming; however, the subsequent request for a ceasefire from Pakistan just 100 hours later validated India's objective of establishing deterrence through decisive retaliation.

The Three Pillars of the Doctrine of Sindoor

Central to this doctrine is a transformative triad, as articulated by Prime Minister Modi and emphasized by the Indian Director General of Military Operations, which signifies a strategic evolution in India's approach to addressing terrorism and threats sponsored by states.

Decisive Retaliation at a Time and Place of India's Choosing

India will no longer adhere to a reactive or defensive posture. As PM Modi stated, terrorist attacks on Indian soil will invite direct action against their origins.

No longer will geography or political pressure dictate India's hand; retaliation will be swift, coordinated, and tailored on India’s terms.

Rejecting the Specter of Nuclear Blackmail

The second pillar dismantles a long-standing psychological barrier the fear of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. India’s leadership has made it clear that nuclear threats will not deter military action against terrorist infrastructure.

As Modi asserted, "Any terrorist safe haven operating under the assurance of nuclear blackmail will face precise and decisive strikes."

This is a bold and calculated declaration, signalling India’s readiness to call Pakistan’s bluff.

 

Equating Terrorist Groups with Their Patron States

The third tenet of the Doctrine of Sindoor erases the artificial distinction between terrorist actors and the governments that shelter them.

"Terror and state cannot be separated when states line up to bury terrorists with honours," Modi pointed out.

This perspective calls for a global re-evaluation of how Pakistan is dealt with diplomatically not as a victim of terrorism, but as its enabler.

Symbolism and Strategic Clarity

The designation of Operation Sindoor is imbued with intentional cultural and emotional significance.

Modi's statement, 'Terrorists erased our women's Sindoor, we dismantled their stronghold,' conveys not only a sense of retribution but also the restoration of national dignity.

It resonates with a shared historical trauma, recalling events from Pulwama to Uri, and recontextualizes India's counter-terrorism strategy in a manner that is both tactical and symbolic.

Furthermore, this operation highlighted the advancement of India's military-industrial sector.

PM Modi underscored the achievements of 'Made in India' defence technologies, illustrating the capabilities of domestic missiles and drones.

This initiative transcends mere military pride; it represents India's aspiration to reshape 21st-century warfare through self-sufficiency and innovation.

A Diplomatic Challenge for the World

In Modi's own words: “Terror and talk cannot go together, terror and trade cannot happen together, and water and blood also cannot flow together.”

These aren’t rhetorical flourishes they form the boundaries of India's future diplomatic engagement with Pakistan.

The message to the international community is unambiguous: India’s willingness to engage in dialogue is now strictly conditional on verifiable action against terrorism.

By declaring that any future talks will be solely about terrorism and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, India has narrowed the field of diplomacy with a surgical precision matching its military strikes.

The New Normal

The Doctrine of Sindoor transcends mere retribution; it seeks to reformulate deterrence theory within the subcontinent.

This approach advocates for a shift from a reactive to a proactive posture, transitioning from diplomatic appeals to military enforcement, and from mere symbolic outrage to tangible repercussions.

Detractors may contend that such assertiveness could exacerbate instability. However, this perspective presupposes that the existing conditions were stable from the outset.

Operation Sindoor has effectively introduced a level of unpredictability not regarding India's vulnerabilities, but concerning its responses.

For the first time in many years, the repercussions of supporting terrorism against India have escalated to a perilously high level for Pakistan.

From Balakot to Sindoor

Since the Balakot air strikes in 2019 and leading up to Operation Sindoor in 2025, India has shifted from a stance of strategic patience to one of proactive engagement.

The Doctrine of Sindoor transcends a mere military strategy; it embodies a national doctrine focused on deterrence, dignity, and decisiveness.

The effectiveness of this doctrine in preventing future attacks or instigating a fundamental change in Pakistan's approach to terrorism is yet to be determined.

However, it is evident that a clear boundary has been established, symbolized by the colour of Sindoor.

13.5.2025

Kuala Lumpur.

© All rights are reserved.

Published at https://focusmalaysia.my/the-doctrine-of-sindoor-indias-red-line-against-terror/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Smart Security, Free Society: Malaysia’s Data Dilemma

In today’s digitally driven world, national security is no longer confined to borders or traditional threats. Cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and asymmetric warfare have become the new frontiers of conflict. Malaysia, strategically located in Southeast Asia and increasingly exposed to regional tensions and internal vulnerabilities, must strengthen its security apparatus. However, doing so must not come at the cost of civil liberties. Malaysia can enhance its security strategy by leveraging insights from advanced data platforms like those pioneered by Palantir Technologies, while maintaining strong democratic oversight to safeguard the fundamental freedoms protected by the Federal Constitution. Palantir Technologies, a U.S.-based company, gained prominence in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Its core software, Gotham, was designed to integrate fragmented intelligence and provide real-time, actionable insights to military and intelligence agencies. Over the years,...

Syringe Attacks in Malaysia and France: Random Violence or Terrorism? - Part 3

The syringe attack on the 12-year-old son of Pandan MP and former Economy Minister, Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has shaken Malaysia. What initially appeared as a rare and bizarre incident now echoes a disturbing pattern witnessed abroad, notably in France. In June 2025, during the Fête de la Musique festival, over 145 people across France reported being pricked with syringes in crowded public areas. In both cases, the weapon of fear was not a gun or bomb but a syringe. When viewed together, the Rafizi incident and the mass needle attacks in France reveal an alarming global trend of unconventional, psychological violence that leaves behind not just physical uncertainty but emotional trauma. The question we must now ask is: are these acts simply random criminality, or should they be treated with the gravity of terrorist attacks? A Pattern Beyond Borders In France, the attacks spanned multiple cities, with 13 confirmed cases in Paris alone. Victims included women, men, and even min...

Constitution of Malaysia: An Introduction Part 5

7 (1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed. (2) A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which he was acquitted or convicted.