Skip to main content

Data on Mexican drug war violence

compiled by Wm. Robert Johnston

Beginning in December 2006, new Mexican President Felipe Calderon launched renewed federal efforts to combat drug-related crime in Mexico. Despite the campaign's significant successes, drug-related violence in Mexico has intensified since then. According to Mexican government statistics, fatalities from fighting between drug cartels, combat between cartels and Mexican authorities, and other drug-related violence has risen from 2,826 in 2007 to 15,273 in 2010. A total of 37,632 drug violence-related deaths are reported in Mexico from 2006 to mid-February 2011.

These profound levels of violence are not best described as a civil war or as terrorism, since on the broad scale they are neither--despite the fact that many attacks target Mexican authorities, that President Calderon has indicated that the cartels seek to subvert the government, and that a limited number of the attacks do meet accepted definitions of terrorism. The violence in general represents a serious degree of lawlessness in Mexico: most of the killings are of drug cartel criminals by drug cartel criminals.

The increased violence does represent a serious foreign policy concern for the United States. At least 259 U.S. citizens were murdered in Mexico from December 2006 to February 2011, including several targeted U.S. government employees. While this is still a minority of deaths of U.S. citizens in Mexico over this period (most deaths are due to motor vehicle and other accidents), the fraction of U.S. citizen deaths in Mexico that are due to violence (cartel-related or not) has risen from 23.7% in 2003-2005 to 32.6% in 2008-June 2010 (based on U.S. State Department figures, which may be incomplete). Valid concerns have been raised along the U.S. border that the violence could spill into the U.S. Of the 34,612 fatalities reported by the Mexican government from December 2006 to December 2010, 47.7% were in states bordering the U.S., and 28.1% were in municipalities within 50 km of the U.S. border.

The following statistics include data derived from a Mexican federal database on drug violence deaths from December 2006 to December 2011, reported by month and by state and municipality, and data derived from a U.S. State Department database on deaths of U.S. citizens abroad from October 2002 to June 2010. Additional figures and reports on particular incidents are compiled from news media reports. Some of the tables below have some focus on casualties to U.S. citizens, for the purpose of clarifying some of the issues for U.S. foreign policy. This should not be construed to diminish the fact that it is primarily the people of Mexico that are being victimized, including innocent Mexican civilians and the Mexican police and troops combating the cartels.

Source: [Upon request]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Terrorism in Africa

According to state.gov, ISIS was defeated a few years ago. However, the organization's presence and existence remain conspicuous in Africa. Ongoing conflicts in Somalia, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso demonstrate that ISIS has shifted its focus away from Iraq and Syria. Although ISIS lacks a clear hierarchy like Al-Qaeda, its followers and supporters wholeheartedly believe in its strong ideology. In 2014, the United States led the formation of a broad international coalition known as 'The Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS' to combat the organization during the height of the Syrian and Iraqi conflict. The primary objectives of this 83-member coalition are to degrade and defeat ISIS, which poses a threat to international peace and security. ISIS has brought thousands of foreign fighters from around the world to combat zones like Syria and Iraq, and it has used technology to promote its violent extremist ideology and instigate terrorist attacks. For example, t

Sedition Act 1948 should have been repealed a long time ago. But why?

THE Sedition Act 1948 is a legislative measure that was enacted in Malaysia during the colonial era, designed to curb any form of speech or expression that was deemed to be seditious in nature with the aim of maintaining public order and security. The Sedition Act has been subject to much debate and criticism, with some arguing that it is a violation of freedom of speech and expression. Despite this, the Act remains in force in Malaysia to this day, albeit with some amendments made over the years. Although I concur with the abolition of this Act, it is imperative that a comparable new legislation be enacted to address the escalating prevalence of racially and religiously bigoted remarks that have been unsettling our distinctive multicultural and multi-religious society as of late. An instance that exemplifies the prudent decision-making of the governing body is the substitution of the Internal Security Act of 1960 with the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA). This rep

THE HISTORY OF TERRORISM: MORE THAN 200 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT

The history of terrorism dates back at least 1500 years when Jewish resistance groups (66 - 72 A.D.) known as Zealots killed Roman soldiers and destroyed Roman property. The term assassin comes from a Shi'ite Muslim sect (Nizari Isma'ilis - also known as hashashins "hashish-eaters") fighting Sunni Muslims (1090 - 1275) and during Medieval Christendom resisting occupation during the Crusades (1095-1291). The hashashins were known to spread terror in the form of murder, including women and children. The brotherhood of Assassins committed terror so as to gain paradise and seventy-two virgins if killed and to receive unlimited hashish while on earth. The modern development of terrorism began during the French Revolution's Reign of Terror (1793 - 1794). During this period the term terrorism was first coined. Through the past two hundred years, terrorism has been used to achieve political ends and has developed as a tool for liberation, oppression, and i